Advertisement

Warmth and Affection: Exploring Thermal Sensation in the Design of Parent-Child Distant Interaction

  • Sunmin LeeEmail author
  • Thecla Schiphorst
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9733)

Abstract

Within HCI there is a history of investigating how wearable technologies provide the promise of creating intimate experiences in distant interactions. Through an iterative design process, we developed a wearable prototype for parent-child remote communication that explored warmth as a metaphor for affection. In our field study, we discovered that children interpreted thermal messages in several ways, constructing their own meanings of messages which support thoughtful interaction with design artifacts. Our findings suggest multiple uses of thermal interaction can arise by engaging the parents in reconsidering the roles of meaning-making in their everyday environment. We discuss how these findings exemplify an emerging design space akin to non-finito products underlying user values and creativity. Furthermore, our findings show how parents and children in different families practicing with the same prototype co-created a set of distinct and unique meaning based on their own creative application of their values surrounding warmth and affection.

Keywords

Somaesthetics Parent-child distant communication Thermal sensation Affection Ambiguity Non-finito products 

References

  1. 1.
    Adcock, M., Boch, M., Harden, V., Harry, D., Poblano, R.V.: Tug n’ talk: a belt buckle for tangible tugging communication. In: CHI 2007. San Jose, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennett, T.: Dr. Bennett’s Developmental Psychology Crash Course (Ages 7–11 Years) (2014). http://getkidsinternetsafe.com/blog/crash-course-for-7-to-11/
  3. 3.
    Choi, Y., Tewell, J., Morisawa, Y., Pradana, G., Cheok, A.: Ring*U: a wearable system for intimate communication using tactile lighting expressions. In: ACE 2014 Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Article No. 63 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Field, T.: Infants’ need for touch. Hum. Dev. 45, 100–103 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gooch, D., Watts, L.: YourGloves, HotHands and HotMits: devices to hold hands at a distance. In: Proceedings of UIST 2012, pp. 157–166. ACM Press (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grunwald, M.: Human Haptic Perception. Basics and Applications. Birkhäuser, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harlow, H.F., Harlow, M.K., Hansen, E.W.: The maternal affectional system of Rhesus monkeys. In: Rhinegold, H.L. (ed.) Maternal Behaviors in Mammals, pp. 254–281. Wiley, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hesse-Biber, N.S., Leavy, P.: The Practice of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, W. Lim, Y.: Thermo-message: exploring the potential of heat as a modality of peripheral expression. In: CHI EA 2010, pp. 4231–4236. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schiphorst, T., Seo, J., Jaffe, N.: Exploring touch and breath in networked wearable installation design. In: MM2010 Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1399–1400. ACM Press, Firenze, Italy, 25–29 October 2010Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schiphorst, T.: Tendrils: exploring the poetics of collective touch in wearable art. In: Proceedings of TEI 2011, pp. 397–398. ACM Press (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seok, J., Woo, J., Lim, Y.: Non-finito products: a new design space of user creativity for personal user experience. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 26 April–01 May 2014Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sengers, P., Gaver, B.: Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the DIS 2006. ACM Press (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suhonen, K., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Mäkelä, K.: User experiences and expectations of vibrotactile, thermal and squeeze feedback in interpersonal communication. In: Proceedings of the BCS-HCI 2012, British Computer Society, pp. 205–214 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Teh, J.K.S., Cheok, A.D., Peiris, R.L., Choi, Y., Thuong, V., Lai, S.: Huggy pajama: a mobile parent and child hugging communication system. In: International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 250–257. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vrontou, S., Wong, A.M., Rau, K.K., Koerber, H.R., Anderson, D.J.: Genetic identification of C fibers that detect massage-like stroking of hairy skin in vivo. Nature 493, 669–673 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wakkary, R., Desjardins, A., Hauser, S.: Unselfconscious interaction in the home: a construct. Interacting with Computers (2015, Submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, R., Quek, F.: Touch and Talk: contextualizing remote touch for affective interaction. In: Proceedings of TEI 2010, pp. 13–20. ACM Press (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiss, W.J., Wilson, P.W., Morrison, D.: Maternal tactile stimulation and the neuro development of low birth weight infants. Infancy 5, 85–107 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Interactive Arts and TechnologySimon Fraser UniversitySurreyCanada

Personalised recommendations