AGILUS: A Method for Integrating Usability Evaluations on Agile Software Development
This paper presents a method for integrating usability evaluations on agile software development aiming to improve software quality and user satisfaction. The proposed method uses three different usability evaluations and user-centered design techniques, during the agile development process with the Scrum framework. The main results are presented in analyses and discussions about the use of the method on the development of two case studies: a Socio-pedagogical Monitoring System and an Event Management System.
KeywordsIntegration of HCI and agile methods Usability evaluation Agile development Scrum framework
The authors of this paper thank to the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Sao Paulo and to the Brazilian Aeronautics Institute of Technology, for accepting their challenges of innovation and for supporting the two case studies.
- 1.Standish Group International. The chaos manifesto (2013)Google Scholar
- 3.Silva da Silva, T., et al.: User-centered design and agile methods: a systematic review. In: Agile Conference, Salt Lake City, Proceedings, pp. 77–86. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2011)Google Scholar
- 4.Crispin, L., Gregory, J.: Agile testing: a practical guide for testers and agile teams. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
- 5.Nielsen, L.L.: Usability requirements in agile development processes. Dissertation (Master in Science) – Technical University of Denmark, DTU Informatics and Mathematical Modeling, Lyngby (2011)Google Scholar
- 6.Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J.: Scrum Guide (2014)Google Scholar
- 7.Agile Manifesto. Manifesto for agile software development (2001)Google Scholar
- 8.Jeffries, R., et al.: User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Proceedings, pp. 119–124. ACM, New York (1991)Google Scholar
- 9.Sauro, J.: A Practical Guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks & Best Practices. Create Space, Denver (2011)Google Scholar