Advertisement

Userbility: A Technique for the Evaluation of User Experience and Usability on Mobile Applications

  • Ingrid NascimentoEmail author
  • Williamson Silva
  • Bruno Gadelha
  • Tayana Conte
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9731)

Abstract

User eXperience (UX) covers the relationship between usability, context of use, and user emotions regarding an application. Improving the UX and usability of an application, especially mobile applications, can influence their acceptance by end users. Although UX and usability evaluations focus on improving the quality of these applications, the software industry performs these evaluations separately. Based on this, we proposed Userbility, a technique for evaluating UX and usability in mobile applications. This technique is based on two methods: the Heuristic Evaluation and 3E method. In order to evaluate the Userbility technique, we conducted a study through the evaluation of five mobile applications. The results of this study show that it is possible to identify improvements in applications through a UX and usability inspection conducted with Userbility and a new version Userbility.

Keywords

User eXperience (UX) Usability Mobile application Evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the financial support granted by CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) and FAPEAM (Foundation for Research Support of the Amazonas State). And the financial support granted by CAPES through process number 175956/2013 and FAPEAM through processes numbers: 062.00600/2014; 062.00578/2014. And all the students volunteers who participated in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, K., Greenberg, S., Gutwin, C.: Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 96–105. ACM (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harrison, R., Flood, D., Duce, D.: Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. J. Interact. Sci. (JoIS) 1(1), 1–16 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience-a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hassenzah, M.: User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine, pp. 11–15. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kronbauer, A.H.; Santos, C.A., Vieira, V.: An experimental study of user experience evaluation of mobile application from the automatic capturing of contextual data and interaction (in Portuguese). In: Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 305–314. Brazilian Computer Society (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krone, C.: Validation the usability heuristic for touchscreen mobile (in Portuguese). Technical report. Grupo de Qualidade de Software/INCoD/UFSC. Florianópolis, SC (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muller, M.: Curiosity, creativity, and surprise as analytic tools: grounded theory method. In: Olson, J.S., Kellogg, W.A. (eds.) Ways of Knowing in HCI, pp. 25–48. Springer, New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 413–414. ACM (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R.B., Padd, H.K.: Usability measurement and metrics: a consolidated model. Softw. Qual. J. 14(2), 159–178 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tähti, M., Niemelä, M.: 3e–expressing emotions and experiences. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Approaches for Evaluating Affective Systems (WP9), HUMAINE, pp. 15–19 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Von Wangenheim, C.G., Witt, T.A., Borgatto, A.F., Nunes, J.V., Lacerda, T.C., Krone, C., de Oliveira Souza, L.: A usability score for mobile phone applications based on heuristics. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. (IJMHCI) 8(1), 23–58 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wasserman, A.I.: Software engineering issues for mobile application development. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Future of Software Engineering Research (FSE/SDP), pp. 397–400. ACM (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid Nascimento
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Williamson Silva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bruno Gadelha
    • 2
  • Tayana Conte
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.USES Research Group – Institute of Computing (IComp)Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM)ManausBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of Computing (IComp)Federal University of Amazonas (UFAM)ManausBrazil

Personalised recommendations