Advertisement

Proactive Functions of a Pedagogical Agent – Steps for Implementing a Social Catalyst Function

  • Madlen Wuttke
  • Michael Heidt
  • Paul Rosenthal
  • Peter Ohler
  • Nicholas H. Müller
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9753)

Abstract

The development of pedagogical agents has been focused on the empirical relevance of outward appearance and the voiced conveyance of information. Rather than following these steps of analysing agents’ looks, the following paper is focused on having pedagogical agents function proactively in regard to the environment the learner is situated in. This means agents are able to listen and react to noise disturbances or obvious attention diversion by the learner. Furthermore, the agent is enhanced by a social catalyst routine, enabling the system to facilitate cooperative learning through the use of narrative techniques for the retention of information.

Keywords

Pedagogical Agent Proactive Narrative Learning Social catalyst 

References

  1. 1.
    Agada, R., Yan, J.: Research to improve communication by animated pedagogical agents. J. Nextp Gener. Inf. Technol. 3(1), 58–69 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baylor, A.L., Rosenberg-Kima, R.B., Plant, E.A.: Interface agents as social models: the impact of appearance on females’ attitude toward engineering. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2006), Montreal (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baylor, A.L., Kim, S.: Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: when less is more. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 450–457 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baylor, A.L., Ryu, J.: The effects of image and animation in enhancing pedagogical agent persona. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 28(4), 373–395 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becker, L.: Apple erhält Patent auf Eye-Tracking-Technik. (2015). http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Apple-erhaelt-Patent-auf-Eye-Tracking-Technik-2523025.html
  6. 6.
    Benjamin, W.: Erzählen - Schriften zur Theorie der Narration und zur literarischen Prosa. Suhrkamp Verlag, Sinzheim (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bischof, A., Obländer, V., Heidt, M., Kanellopoulos, K., Küszter, V., Liebold, B., Martin, K.-U., Pietschmann, D., Storz, M., Tallig, A., Teichmann, M., Wuttke, M.: Interdisziplinäre Impulse für den Begriff “Interaktion”. In: Hobohm, H.-C. (ed.) Informationswissenschaft Zwischen Virtueller Infrastruktur Und Materiellen Lebenswelten. Tagungsband Des 13. Internationalen Symposiums Für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013), pp. 448–453. Hülsbusch, Glücksstadt (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruner, J.: Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campbell, J.: The Hero with a Thousand Faces, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, New York (1968). (Third Printing 1973 Ausg.)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Cobley, P.: Narrative. Routledge, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Craig, S.D., Gholson, B., Driscoll, D.M.: Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. J. Educ. Psychol. 94(2), 428–434 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crittenden, C.: Fictional characters and logical completeness. Poetics 11, 331–344 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., Hager, J.C.: Facial Action Coding System - The Manual. Research Nexus division of Network Information Research Corporation, Salt Lake City (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freytag, G.: Die Technik des Dramas. Verlag von S. Hirzel, Leipzig (1863)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerrig, R.J.: Experiencing Narrative Worlds. On the Psychological Activities of Reading. Westview Press, London (1993)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heidig, S., Clarebout, G.: Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning? Educ. Res. Rev. 6, 27–54 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heidt, Michael: Examining interdisciplinary prototyping in the context of cultural communication. In: Marcus, Aaron (ed.) DUXU 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8013, pp. 54–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heidt, M.: Reconstructing coding practice - towards a methodology for source-code. In: Boll, S., Maaß, S., Malaka, R. (eds.) Mensch & Computer 2013 - Workshopband, pp. 271–275. Oldenbourg Verlag, München (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heidt, M., Kanellopoulos, K., Pfeiffer, L., Rosenthal, P.: Diverse ecologies – interdisciplinary development for cultural education. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 8120, pp. 539–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heidt, M., Pfeiffer, L., Berger, A., Rosenthal, P.: PRMD. In: Mensch & Computer 2014 - Workshopband. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, pp. 45–48 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hendricks, W.O.: The structural study of narration. Poetics 1(3), 100–123 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huang, H.-H., Cerekovic, A., Pandzic, I.S., Nakano, Y., Nishida, T.: Toward a multi-culture adaptive virtual tour guide agent with a modular approach. Artif. Intell. Soc. 24, 225–235 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kapoor, A., Qi, Y., Picard, R. W.: Fully automatic upper facial action recognition. In: IEEE International Workshop Analysis and Modeling of Faces and Gestures AMFG 2003, pp. 195–202 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L., Shen, E.: Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 23, 220–234 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim, Y., Wei, Q.: The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment. Comput. Educ. 56, 505–514 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lebowitz, M.: Creating characters in a story-telling universe. Poetics 13, 171–194 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lester, J.C., Converse, S.A., Kahler, S.E., Barlow, S.T., Stone, B.A., Bhogal, R.S.: The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In: Pemberton, S. (ed.) Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 1997 Conference Proceedings, pp. 359–366. ACM Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lusk, M.M., Atkinson, R.K.: Animated pedagogical agents: does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 21, 747–764 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Majaranta, P.: Communication and text entry by Gaze. In: Majaranta, P., Aoki, H., Donegan, M., Hansen, D.W., Hansen, J.P., Hyrskykary, A., Räihä, K.-J. (eds.) Gaze Interaction and Applications of Eye Tracking. IGI Global, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mar, R.A.: The neuropsychology of narrative: story comprehension, story production and their interrelation. Neuropsychologia 42, 1414–1434 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mattila, Anna S.: The role of narratives in the advertising of experiential services. J. Serv. Res. 3(1), 35–45 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mielke, C.: Zyklisch-serielle Narration: erzähltes Erzählen von 1001 Nacht bis zur TV-Serie. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, Berlin (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moreno, R., Flowerday, T.: Student’s choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: a test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 31, 186–207 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Parker, P.: Die Kreative Matrix. UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, Konstanz (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Televisions, and New Media like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Scovsgaard, H., Räihä, K.-J., Tall, M.: Computer Control by Gaze. In: Majaranta, P., Aoki, H., Donegan, M., Hansen, D.W., Hansen, J.P., Hyrskykary, A., Räihä, K.-J. (eds.) Gaze Interaction and Applications of Eye Tracking. IGI Global, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sugiyama, M.S.: On the origins of narrative. Hum. Nat. 7(4), 403–425 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vanderbilt, T.C.A.T.G.: Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educ. Researcher 19(6), 2–10 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    TheEyeTribe: The World’s first $99 eye tracker with full SDK (2015). https://www.theeyetribe.com/
  41. 41.
    Veletsianos, G.: The impact and implications of virtual character expressiveness on learning and agent–learner interactions. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 25, 345–357 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Veletsianos, G.: How do learners respond to pedagogical agents that deliver social-oriented non-task messages? impact on student learning, perceptions, and experiences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28, 275–283 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Mayer, R.E., Risso, P., Shaw, E., Collins, H.: The politeness effect: pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66, 98–112 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wood, S.: Writer’s Digest - Write Better Get Published. Abgerufen am 18. März 2010 von 9 Tricks to Writing Suspense Fiction (2008). http://www.writersdigest.com/article/nine-tricks-to-writing-suspense-fiction
  45. 45.
    Wuttke, M.: Pro-active pedagogical agents. In: Fakultät für Informatik (ed.). Proceedings of International Summer Workshop Computer Science, pp. 59–62 (2013)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wuttke, M., Heidt, M.: Beyond presentation - employing proactive intelligent agents as social catalysts. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8511, pp. 182–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wuttke, M., Martin, K.-U.: Natural forms of communication and adaptive behaviour in human-computer-interaction. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8511, pp. 641–647. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wuttke, M., Belentschikow, V., Müller, N.H.: Storytelling as a means to transfer knowledge via narration–a scenario for a narrating pedagogical agent. i-com 14(2), 155–160 (2015). doi: 10.1515/icom-2015-0034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madlen Wuttke
    • 1
  • Michael Heidt
    • 2
  • Paul Rosenthal
    • 3
  • Peter Ohler
    • 4
  • Nicholas H. Müller
    • 4
  1. 1.Media-Psychology, Faculty of HumanitiesChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany
  2. 2.Visual Computing Laboratory, Faculty of InformaticsChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany
  3. 3.Visual Computing Laboratory, Faculty of InformaticsChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany
  4. 4.Media-Psychology, Faculty of HumanitiesChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations