Tomorrow’s On-Board Learning System (TOOLS)

  • Manuel OliveiraEmail author
  • Joao Costa
  • Hans Torvatn
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9753)


Efficient maritime training is important to build a competent workforce of seafarers, able to operate safe, following rules and regulations. The most widely used methods of onboard training is the so called Computer Based Training (CBT), which simply is a set of electronic lectures and multiple choice tests afterwards. While widely used this method has been criticized for being individualistic, difficult to apply in a practical setting, boring and demotivating for learning. Alternative methods have not been developed, partly because of the dominance of the CBT method, but also because bandwidth and connectivity issues for ships have restricted both use of more interactive and internet based tools. The Tomorrow’s onboard learning system (TOOLS) was a project to research and develop an innovative game-based learning platform for on-board training, along with a course on energy efficiency. The chosen topic was of keen interest to the ship owners that took part of the project, aiming to achieve fuel savings whilst reducing the impact on the environment. The paper describes the TOOLS platform, the course developed and the evaluation results from two vessels, one from each participating shipping company.


Maritime training Serious games Onboard training 



The authors would like to thank the funding of the TOOLS project from the national Norwegian research council.


  1. 1.
    Aldrich, C.: The Complete Guide to Simulations and Serious Games: How the Most Valuable Content Will be Created in the Age Beyond Gutenberg to Google. Jossey Bas, San Francisco (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lamvik, G.M., Wahl, A.M., Buvik, M.P.: Professional culture, work practice and reliable operations in shipping. In: Briš, R., Martorell, S. (eds.) Reliability. Risk and Safety. Taylor & Frances Group, London (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 94–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahanta, D., Ahmed, M.: e-Learning objectives, methodologies, tools and its limitation. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. (IJITEE) 2(1), 2278–3075 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noesgaard, S., Ørngreen, R.: The effectiveness of e-Learning: an explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-Learning effectiveness. Electron. J. e-Learn. 13(4), 278–290 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oltedal, H.A., Tvedt, S.D.: Filipino cadets’ attitudes and expectations to-wards safety in work at sea. In: Scandinavian Maritime Conference, 28–29 November 2012 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sintef, Technology and SocietyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.HighSkillzLondonUK

Personalised recommendations