Advertisement

MADE Ratio: Affective Multimodal Software for Mathematical Concepts

  • Reza GhasemAghaeiEmail author
  • Ali Arya
  • Robert Biddle
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9753)

Abstract

This paper addresses the use of multiple sensory modalities and affective strategies in learning mathematics. A case study is presented where these domains are used to design a mathematical ratio system. We adopted a multimodal approach used by other researchers, and applied our proposed design methods to create the MADE Ratio system. We then recruited participants to test the usability of the system. Our findings were that the design methods were effective, but we also gained insight about how they could be improved.

Keywords

Multimodality Affect Educational software 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the participants in this study, and lab colleagues for comments. We acknowledge a Discovery Grant through the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and funding from the Industry Canada GRAND Network of Centres of Excellence.

References

  1. 1.
    Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of education goals. In: Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Longman (1956)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dourish, P.: Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fogg, B.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    GhasemAghaei, R., Arya, A., Biddle, R.: Design practices for multimodal affective mathematical learning. In: 20th International Symposium of Computer Science and Software Engineering, IEEE CSSE (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    GhasemAghaei, R., Arya, A., Biddle, R.: The MADE framework: multimodal software for affective education. In: EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, vol. 2015, pp. 1864–1874 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howison, M., Trninic, D., Reinholz, D., Abrahamson, D.: The mathematical imagery trainer: from embodied interaction to conceptual learning. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1989–1998. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kort, B., Reilly, R., Picard, R.W.: An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. In: ICALT, p. 0043. IEEE (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oviatt, S.: Multimodal interfaces. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human-computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 286–304. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA (2003). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=772072.772093 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Preece, J., Sharp, H., Rogers, Y.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations