Advertisement

Evaluating Usability of M-Learning Application in the Context of Higher Education Institute

  • Aijaz Ahmed Arain
  • Zahid HussainEmail author
  • Wajid H. Rizvi
  • Muhammad Saleem Vighio
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9753)

Abstract

In a system development process, usability evaluation is a crucial part of the process. The purpose of this paper is to test the usability of new developed application called “DARSGAH” for getting optimum outcomes from m-learning (Mobile Learning) technology. This application provides learning opportunities to University students. Initially, pilot test was conducted with 10 participants. After slight word refinement and minor changes in the application full scale usability test was conducted with other 100 participants who were selected randomly from the University by generating random numbers (student IDs) using SPSS. The data was collected using System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire immediately after the test, to obtain students’ overall perception about the application. The findings revealed that the application is user friendly, effective, and efficient and the users were satisfied as the overall average score of SUS is 84. The total task completion rate was 100 % which means that the application was very effective.

Keywords

M-learning Usability testing System Usability Scale (SUS) Usefulness DARSGAH Mobile application 

References

  1. 1.
    Ko, E.H., Chiu, D.K., Lo, P., Ho, K.K.: Comparative study on m-learning usage among LIS students from Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan. J. Acad. Librariansh. 41(5), 567–577 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Althunibat, A.: Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 65–71 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gong Chao.: (2009) Human-computer interaction: the usability test methods and design principles in the human-computer interface design. In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, ICCSIT 2009, pp. 283–285, 8–11 August 2009Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bandi, A., Heeler, P.: Usability testing: a software engineering perspective. In: 2013 International Conference on Human Computer Interactions (ICHCI), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng, J., Zhu, Y., Zhang, T., Zhu, C., Zhou, W.: Mobile compatibility testing using multi-objective genetic algorithm. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE), pp. 302–307. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, T., Gao, J., Cheng, J., Uehara, T.: Compatibility testing service for mobile applications. In: IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering, pp. 179–186 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tullis, T., Stetson, J.: A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In: Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Association (UPA) 2004 Conference, pp. 7–11 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fetaji, B., Ebibi, M., Fetaji, M.: Assessing effectiveness in mobile learning by devising MLUAT (Mobile Learning Usability Attribute Testing) methodology. Int. J. Comput. Commun. 5(3), 178–187 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alelaiwi, A., Hossain, M.S.: Evaluating and testing user interfaces for e-learning system: blackboard usability testing. J. Inf. Eng. Appl. 5(1), 23–30 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Summers, S., Watt, A.: Quick and dirty usability testing in the technical communication classroom. In: Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2015 IEEE International, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, K.B., Salman, R.: The design and development of mobile collaborative learning application using android. J. Inf. Technol. Appl. Educ. 1(1), 1–8 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raptis, D., Tselios, N., Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.B.: Does size matter?: investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users’ perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 127–136. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baillie, L., Morton, L.: Designing quick & dirty applications for mobiles: making the case for the utility of HCI principles. In: Proceedings of the ITI 2009 31st International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, ITI2009, pp. 293–298. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aijaz Ahmed Arain
    • 1
  • Zahid Hussain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wajid H. Rizvi
    • 2
  • Muhammad Saleem Vighio
    • 1
  1. 1.Science and TechnologyQuaid-E-Awam University of Engineering, Science and TechnologyNawabshahPakistan
  2. 2.Institute of Business AdministrationKarachiPakistan

Personalised recommendations