Mixed Method Assessment for BIM Implementation in the AEC Curriculum

  • Jose FerrandizEmail author
  • David Fonseca
  • Abdulaziz Banawi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9753)


This paper aims to design a mixed-method evaluation study. The target of this study is to analyze the implementation of the Building Information Modeling/Management technology in the Architectural Engineering Curriculum. We will use the mixed-method evaluation process based on quantitative and qualitative approaches to measure the level of motivation, satisfaction and performance of the students with Building Information Modeling/Management (BIM) technology and obtaining the proper feedback to optimize the implementation of BIM in the Architectural, Engineering and Construction Management (AEC) curriculum.


BIM AEC Curriculum Higher education Mixed methods Enhanced learning User centered evaluation Motivation Satisfaction User profile 


  1. 1.
    Sabongi, F.J.: The integration of BIM in the undergraduate curriculum: an analysis of undergraduate courses. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ASC International Conference (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McFarlane, B.: How a major design firm adapted to a paradigm shift. Healthc. Des. 8, 12 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thompson, D., Miner, R.G.: Building information modeling-BIM: contractual risks are changing with technology (2006).
  4. 4.
    Rabee Reffat, K.F.U.P.M.: Revitalizing architectural design studio teaching using ICT: reflections on practical implementations. Int. J. Educ. Dev. using ICT, 3(1) (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitchell, W.J.: Computer-Aided Architectural Design, 573 p. Ill. Mason Charter Publishers, Inc., New York (1977)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ullman, D.G., Wood, S., Craig, D.: The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Comput. Graph. 14(2), 263–274 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanguinetti, P., Abdelmohsen, S., Lee, J., Lee, J., Sheward, H., Eastman, C.: General system architecture for BIM: an integrated approach for design and analysis. Adv. Eng. Inform. 26(2), 317–333 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fassi, F.: 3D modeling of complex architecture integrating different techniques – a critical overview. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. Zurich XXXVI-5/W47, 11 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., Sánchez, A.: Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 434–445 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor, M.J., Liu, J., Hein, M.F.: Integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) into an ACCE Accredit Construction Management Curriculum (2007).
  12. 12.
    Camps, H. L.: BIM: education and the global economy. JBIM 2, 33–37. (2008). Spring, Washington,
  13. 13.
    Bronet, F., Cheng, R., Eastman, J., Hagen, S., Hemsath, S., Khan, S., Regan, T., Ryan, R., Scheer, D.: Draft: the future of architectural education. In: AIA TAP 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Techel, F., Nassar, K.: A sustainability design perspective. In: Proceedings of ASCAAD 2007, Alexandria, Egypt (2007).
  15. 15.
    Hietanen, J., Drogemuller, R.: Approaches to university level BIM education. In: IABSE Conference, Helsinki, Finland (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kymmell, W.: Building Information Modeling: Planning and Managing Construction Projects with 4D CAD and Simulations. McGraw Hill, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barison, M.B., Santos, E.T.: BIM teaching strategies: an overview of the current approaches. In: Proceedings of ICCCBE 2010 International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Villagrasa, S.: Mixed-methods research: a new approach to evaluating the motivation and satisfaction of university students using advanced visual technologies. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(3), 311–322 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fonseca, D., Valls, F., Redondo, E., Villagrasa, S.: Informal interactions in 3D education: citizenship participation and assessment of virtual urban proposals. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 504–518 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pifarré, M., Tomico, O.: Bipolar laddering (BLA): a participatory subjective exploration method on user experience. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing for User eXperiences (DUX 2007), p. 12. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007). Article 2Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(2), 112–133 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martín Gutiérrez, J.: Estudio y evaluación de contenidos didácticos en el desarrollo de las habilidades espaciales en el ámbito de la ingeniería (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Redondo, E., Fonseca, D., Sánchez, A., Navarro, I.: Augmented reality in architecture degree. New approaches in scene illumination and user evaluation. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Appl. Educ. (JITAE) 1(1), 19–27 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fonseca, D., Villagrasa, S., Valls, F., Redondo, E., Climent, A., Vicent, L.: Engineering teaching methods using hybrid technologies based on the motivation and assessment of student’s profiles. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2014 IEEE, pp. 1–8 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fonseca, D., Villagrasa, S., Valls, F., Redondo, E., Climent, A., Vicent, L.: Motivation assessment in engineering students using hybrid technologies for 3D visualization. In: 2014 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), pp. 111–116 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jose Ferrandiz
    • 1
    Email author
  • David Fonseca
    • 2
  • Abdulaziz Banawi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringUnited Arab Emirates UniversityAl AinUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.GRETEL - Grup de Recerca en Technology Enhanced LearningLa Salle Universitat Ramon LlullBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Architectural EngineeringKing abdulaziz universityRabigSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations