Business Process Feature Model: An Approach to Deal with Variability of Business Processes

  • Riccardo CogniniEmail author
  • Flavio Corradini
  • Andrea Polini
  • Barbara Re


In order to help organizations in providing similar services without the need to structure each of them separately, this chapter presents a modeling notation that supports variability for Business Process modeling. Variability is particularly relevant for Public Administration institutions where different offices organize the provisioning of services to citizens following similar rules, and adapting them to the characteristics of the different offices. The notation and the approach are inspired to feature modeling techniques, whereas in this case features are used to represent activities of a process family that can be differently implemented and connected. The proposed approach facilitates the development of a partially specified process model in terms of a set of fragments that in a subsequent step can be connected in order to fully specify the desired control flow. The notation and the approach were implemented on the the ADOxx platform.


Feature model Variability Business processes Modeling environment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Awad, A., Decker, G., Lohmann, N.: Diagnosing and repairing data anomalies in process models. In: BP Management Workshops, pp. 5–16. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Döhring, M., Zimmermann, B.: vBPMN: event-aware workflow variants by weaving BPMN2 and business rules. In: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, pp. 332–341. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fill, H.-G., Karagiannis, D.: On the conceptualisation of modelling methods using the ADOxx meta modelling platform. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Architect. 8(1), 4–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Jansen-Vullers, M.H.: Configurable process models a foundational approach. In: Reference Modeling, pp. 59–77. Springer (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gottschalk, F., Van Der Aalst, W.M.P., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., La Rosa, M.: Configurable workflow models. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 17(02), 177–221 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gottschalk, F., Wagemakers, T.A.C., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., van der Aalst, W.M.P., La Rosa, M.: Configurable process models: experiences from a municipality case study. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 486–500. Springer (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Capturing variability in business process models: the provop approach. J. Softw. Maintenance Evolution: Res. Pract. 22(6–7), 519–546 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J., Gottschalk, F.: Beyond control-flow: extending business process configuration to roles and objects. In: Conceptual Modeling-ER 2008, pp. 199–215. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lönn, C.-M., Uppström, E., Wohed, P., Juell-Skielse, G.: Configurable process models for the swedish public sector. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 190–205. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    OMG. Case Management Model and Notation, Version 1.0, May 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Declare: full support for loosely-structured processes. In: 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2007, EDOC 2007, p. 287. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.J.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations. Principles and Techniques. Springer-Verlag, New York Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Van Der Aalst, W., Jansen-Vullers, M., Dreiling, A.: Configurable reference modeling languages. Ref. Model. Bus. Syst. Anal. 22–46 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems: Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A configurable reference modelling language. Inf. Syst. 32(1), 1–23 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schnieders, A., Puhlmann, F.: Variability mechanisms in e-business process families. BIS 85, 583–601 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riccardo Cognini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Flavio Corradini
    • 1
  • Andrea Polini
    • 1
  • Barbara Re
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of CamerinoCamerinoItaly

Personalised recommendations