Advertisement

Using the Horus Method for Succeeding in Business Process Engineering Projects

  • Andreas Schoknecht
  • Arthur Vetter
  • Hans-Georg Fill
  • Andreas Oberweis
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the Horus Method for business process engineering, which is divided into four phases. These four phases consist of (1) an initial project preparation phase; (2) a strategy and architecture phase for the definition of strategic aspects as well as enterprise and system architecture; (3) a business process analysis phase; and (4) an application phase for the actual usage of models, thereby covering essential aspects of business process engineering. A formal conceptualization of the Horus Method is provided using the FDMM formalism, which is used for tool specification for the ADOxx platform. Thereby, the focus is on the formalization of XML nets, a special variant of high-level Petri Nets, for the modeling of interorganizational business processes in the field of e-commerce. Finally, a real-life case study is described which highlights the capabilities of the Horus Method for successful business process engineering projects.

Keywords

Business process management Business process engineering Horus method FDMM formalism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrews, K.R.: The Concept of Corporate Strategy, 2nd edn. R.D. Irwin (1980)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antón, A., McCracken, W., Potts, C.: Goal decomposition and scenario analysis in business process reengineering. In: Wijers, G., Brinkkemper, S., Wasserman, T. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol. 811, pp. 94–104. Springer, Berlin (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of business process modeling. In: van der Aalst, W., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management—Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol. 1806, pp. 30–49. Springer, berlin (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fill, H., Hickl, S., Karagiannis, D., Oberweis, A., Schoknecht, A.: A formal specification of the horus modeling language using FDMM. In: 11th Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI), pp. 1165–1180. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Leipzig, Germany (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fill, H., Redmond, T., Karagiannis, D.: FDMM: a formalism for describing ADOxx meta models and models. In: Maciaszek, L.A., Cuzzocrea, A., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), vol. 3, pp. 133–144. SciTePress, Wroclaw, Poland (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fill, H.G., Karagiannis, D.: On the conceptualisation of modelling methods using the ADOxx meta modelling platform. Enter. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. 8(1), 4–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guha, S., Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.T.: Business process reengineering. Inf. Syst. Manag. 10(3), 13–22 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herfurth, M., Karle, T., Schönthaler, F.: Reference Model for Service-oriented Business Software Based on Web Service Nets. In: Hesse, W., Oberweis, A. (eds.) 3rd AIS SIGSAND European Symposium on Analysis, Design, Use and Societal Impact of Information. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), vol. 129, pp. 55–70. Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI), Marburg, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karle, T., Teichenthaler, K.: Kollaborative Geschäftsprozess-Umsetzung bei Unternehmensfusionen und ERP-Rollouts. DOAG Bus. News 2, 5–10 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lenz, K., Oberweis, A.: Modeling interorganizational workflows with XML nets. In: 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-34). IEEE Computer Society, Maui, Hawaii, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mayer, R.J., DeWitte, P.S.: Delivering results: evolving BPR from art to engineering. In: Elzinga, D., Gulledge, T., Lee, C.Y. (eds.) Business Process Engineering—Advancing the State of the Art, pp. 83–129. Springer, US (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scheer, A.W., Abolhassan, F., Jost, W., Kirchmer, M. (eds.): Business Process Excellence—ARIS in Practice. Springer, Berlin (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schönthaler, F., Vossen, G., Oberweis, A., Karle, T.: Business Processes for Business Communities—Modeling Languages, Methods, Tools, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weske, M.: Business Process Management—Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Schoknecht
    • 1
  • Arthur Vetter
    • 2
  • Hans-Georg Fill
    • 3
  • Andreas Oberweis
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.PROMATIS Software GmbHEttlingenGermany
  3. 3.Faculty of Computer ScienceUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations