Advertisement

Distracted Driving: Scientific Basis for Risk Assessments of Driver’s Workplaces

  • Benno GrossEmail author
  • Sylwia Birska
  • Michael Bretschneider-Hagemes
  • Endri Kerluku
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9752)

Abstract

At professional driver’s workplaces, mobile devices are used as telematics applications for information exchange between dispatchers and drivers. In addition to the wide-ranging benefits, it nevertheless emerges potential for new risks, such as distracting drivers. The present study is based on conditions encountered in an existing company in the passenger transport sector and is part of a consultation of the Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Germany to support the implementation of a risk assessment regarding the applied telematics software. In order to analyze the impact on driving performance and visual processing of the used telematics application, the study employed two driving simulation sessions (LCT, rFactor 1) and one eye-tracking session. Results indicated that the examined application may be considered tolerable in terms of the AAM criteria for In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems.

Keywords

Distraction Risk assessment Professional drivers In-vehicle information systems 

References

  1. 1.
    Schömig, N., Schoch, S., Neukum, N., Schumacher, Wandtner, B: Simulatorstudien zur Ablenkungswirkung fahrfremder Tätigkeiten (Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Reihe Mensch und Sicherheit, Heft M253). Bremen (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions of approval and reciprocal recognition of approval for motor vehicle equipment and parts. Addendum 20, revision 2 (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Straßenverkehrs-Zulassungs-Ordnung in der Fassung der “Verordnung zur Änderung der Fahrpersonalverordnung, der Straßenverkehrs-Zulassungs-Ordnung und der Verordnung über den grenzüberschreitenden Güterkraftverkehr und den Kabotageverkehr” vom 9. März 2015, ausgegeben zu Bonn am 10. März 2015 (BGBl. Teil I Nr. 9, Seite 243), in Kraft am Tag nach der VerkündungGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Statement of Principles on the Design of Human Machine Interaction (ESoP) (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group: Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems–including 2006 updated sections. Washington, DC (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graf, S.: Interaktions- und Suchverfahren zur Integration mobiler Endgeräte in Fahrerinformationssysteme. München (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO 26022: Road vehicles - Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems - Simulated lane change test to assess in-vehicle secondary task demand (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mattes, S.: The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. In: Strasser, H., Kluth, K., Rausch, H., Bubb, H. (Eds.), Quality of Work and Products in Enterprises of the Future, pp. 57–60, Stuttgart (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benno Gross
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sylwia Birska
    • 1
  • Michael Bretschneider-Hagemes
    • 1
  • Endri Kerluku
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthSankt AugustinGermany

Personalised recommendations