Advertisement

Defective Still Deflective – How Correctness of Decision Support Systems Influences User’s Performance in Production Environments

  • Philipp Brauner
  • André Calero Valdez
  • Ralf Philipsen
  • Martina Ziefle
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9752)

Abstract

The increasing dynamic and complexity of todays global supply chains and the growing amount and complexity of information challenge decision makers in manufacturing companies. Decision Support Systems (DSS) can be a viable solution to address these challenges and increase the overall decision efficiency and effectivity. However, a thought-through design and implementation of these systems is crucial for their efficacy.

This article presents the current state-of-the-art of Decisions Support Systems and highlights their benefits and pitfalls. Also, we present an empirical study in which we compared different levels of decision support and decision automation in a simulated supply chain game environment.

We identify and quantify how human factors influence the decision quality and decision performance in this supply chain scenario. We show that an adequately designed system raises the overall performance. However, insufficiently designed systems have the reverse effect and lead operators to miss severe situations, which can have fatal consequences for manufacturing companies.

Keywords

Decision support systems Automation Enterprise resource planning Supply chain management Business simulation game Human factors Industrial Internet Industry 4.0 Integrative Production Technology Usability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants of this strenuous experiment and Frederic Speicher and Anaïs Habermann for their support. The German Research Foundation (DFG) founded this project within the Cluster of Excellence “Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries” (EXC 128).

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.A.: A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 3, 18–23 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shim, J.P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J.F., Power, D.J., Sharda, R., Carlsson, C.: Past, present, and future of decision support technology (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gorry, G.A., Morton, M.S.S.: A framework for management information systems. Sloan Manage. Rev. 13, 50–70 (1971)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimball, R., Ross, M.: The Data Warehouse Toolkit: The Complete Guide to Dimensional Modelling. Wiley, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Codd, E., Codd, S., Salley, C.: Providing OLAP to user-analysts: an IT mandate (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bra, A., Lungu, I.: Improving decision support systems with data mining techniques. In: Advances in Data Mining Knowledge Discovery and Applications. InTech (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Phillips-Wren, G.: Ai tools in decision making support systems: a review. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 21, 1–13 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tomaszewski, W.: Computer-based medical decision support system based on guidelines, clinical pathways and decision nodes. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 14(1), 107–116 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wen, W., Wang, W.K., Wang, C.H.: A knowledge-based intelligent decision support system for national defense budget planning. Expert Syst. Appl. 28, 55–66 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shibl, R., Lawley, M., Debuse, J.: Factors influencing decision support system acceptance. Decis. Support Syst. 54, 953–961 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, C.-W., Koufaris, M.: The impact of decision support system features on user overconfidence and risky behavior. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24, 607–623 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Djamasbi, S., Loiacono, E.T.: Do men and women use feedback provided by their decision support systems (DSS) differently? Decis. Support Syst. 44, 854–869 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Althuizen, N., Reichel, A., Wierenga, B.: Help that is not recognized: harmful neglect of decision support systems. Decis. Support Syst. 54, 719–728 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ben-Zvi, T.: Measuring the perceived effectiveness of decision support systems and their impact on performance. Decis. Support Syst. 54, 248–256 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ziefle, M., Brauner, P., Speicher, F.: Effects of data presentation and perceptual speed on speed and accuracy in table reading for inventory control. Occup. Ergon. 12, 119–129 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mittelstädt, V., Brauner, P., Blum, M., Ziefle, M.: On the visual design of ERP systems – the role of information complexity, presentation and human factors. In: 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015, pp. 270–277 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sterman, J.D.: Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Manage. Sci. 35, 321–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stiller, S., Falk, B., Philipsen, R., Brauner, P., Schmitt, R., Ziefle, M.: A game-based approach to understand human factors in supply chains and quality management. Procedia CIRP 20, 67–73 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H., Dermen, D.: Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton (1976)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A.: Handbook of Human Factors and the Older Adult. Academic Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Forrester, J.W.: Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1961)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Philipsen, R., Brauner, P., Stiller, S., Ziefle, M., Schmitt, R.: Understanding and supporting decision makers in quality management of production networks. In: Advances in the Ergonomics in Manufacturing. Managing the Enterprise of the Future 2014: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, AHFE 2014, pp. 94–105. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Philipp, B., Ralf, P., Martina, Z.: Projecting efficacy and use of business simulation games in the production domain using technology acceptance models. In: Proceedings of the Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference, AHFE 2016 (2016, in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philipp Brauner
    • 1
  • André Calero Valdez
    • 1
  • Ralf Philipsen
    • 1
  • Martina Ziefle
    • 1
  1. 1.Human-Computer Interaction Center (HCIC) Chair of Communication ScienceRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations