Advertisement

Gamification Aspects in the Context of Electronic Government and Education: A Case Study

  • Fernando Timoteo FernandesEmail author
  • Plinio Thomaz Aquino Junior
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9752)

Abstract

The user experience, product quality and confidence in the institution are critical success factors in the use of services in e-government. The usability evaluation and analysis of user interaction in e-government, usually occurs in a timely manner and limited to few users. One way to provide the user immediate feedback and get usage statistics of a continuously service is using the technique known as gamification. The objective of this study is to propose a method to select and apply electronic game elements as motivational factors in access to information produced by the government and then test the impact of these elements. Thus, this research focuses on scenarios where e-government services have an emphasis on providing information to citizens and enabling a two-way interaction. It is intended to identify gamification mechanisms such as points, badges, levels, rankings and others and apply them to the application’s tasks and user’s different motivations when they are immersed on a virtual environment. The purpose of this work is to develop an experiment gamification technique in the stages known as improved information services and transactional services of e-government which allow two-way interaction with citizens. This article presents ways to motivate the user and improve citizens feedback. The results demonstrate the successful use of gamification technique in e-government scenarios that provide educational services to citizens.

Keywords

Gamification User motivation e-government 

References

  1. 1.
    Campos, R., Marques, C.G.: The evolution and the future of the e-government. In: Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, S., Tan, X., Trimi, S.: Current practices of leading e-government countries. Commun. ACM 48, 6 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brasil. TIC Domicílios e Empresas. São Paulo: Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil, p. 662 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Korn, O.: Industrial playgrounds: how gamification helps to enrich work for elderly or impaired persons in production, p. 4. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erenli, K. The impact of gamification: a recommendation of scenarios for education. In: 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), p. 8 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubois, D.J., Tamburrelli, G.: Understanding gamification mechanisms for software development. In: 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering - ESEC/FSE 2013. ACM Press, Saint Petersburg, Russia (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodrigues, L.F., Costa, C.J., Oliveira, A.: The adoption of gamification in e-banking. In: International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication - ISDOC 2013, p. 47 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bista, S.K. et al.: Using gamification in an online community In: 8th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, Pittsburgh (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    UN. e-government Survey, p. 160. United Nations, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Filgueiras, L., Aquino Jr., P., Sakai, R., Filho, A.G., Torres, C., Barbarian, I.: Personas como modelo de usuários de serviços de governo eletrônico. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction, p. 319–324, Cuernavaca, Mexico, 23–26 October 2005. doi: 10.1145/1111360.1111395
  11. 11.
    Filgueiras, L., Aquino Jr., P., Tokairim, V., Torres, C., Barbarian, I.: Usability evaluation as quality assurance of e-government services: the e-poupatempo case. In: IFIP: Building the e-Service Society: e-Commerce, e-Business, and e-Government, pp. 77–87. Kluwer, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tokkonen, H.: How user experience is understood. In: Science and Information Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassenzahl, M.: User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality, p. 11–15 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fadel, L.M., et al.: Gamificação na educação, pp. 1–302. Pimenta Cultural, São Paulo (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zichermann, G., Cunningham, C.: Gamification by Design. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deterding, S. et al.: From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness : Defining “Gamification”, p. 7. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alves, F.P., Maciel, C., Anacleto, J.C.: Investigando a percepção dos usuários sobre os mecanismos de gamificação da rede social Foursquare. In: IHC 2012 Companion (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hamari, J., Sarsa, H.: Does gamification work ? — a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Borges, S. et al.: A systematic mapping on gamification applied to education, p. 7. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schell, J.: The Art of Game Design a Book of Lenses. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, p. 489 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferro, L.S., Walz, S.P., Greuter, S.: Towards personalised, gamified systems: an investigation into game design, personality and player typologies, p. 6. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bartle, R.: Hearts, Clubs, Diamonds, Spades: Players Who Suit MUDs. http://mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm
  23. 23.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, New York (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Layne, K., Lee, J.: Developing fully functional e-government: a four stage model. Gov. Inf. Q. 18(2), 14 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lau, T.Y., et al.: Adoption of e-government in three Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Telecommun. Policy 32(2), 88–100 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aquino Jr., P.T.: PICaP: padrões e personas para expressão da diversidade de usuários no projeto de interação. In: Tese (Doutorado) - Escola Politécnica da Universidade de S. Paulo, p. 224. São Paulo (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Timoteo Fernandes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Plinio Thomaz Aquino Junior
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.IPT - Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas do Estado de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Centro Universitário da FEISão Bernardo do CampoBrazil

Personalised recommendations