Advertisement

Knowledge Sharing-Based Value Co-creation Between E-Commerce Enterprises and Logistics Service Providers

  • Yumeng MiaoEmail author
  • Rong Du
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9751)

Abstract

Under the new economic forms of China’s “Internet +” strategy, the Internet technologies spill over into different areas in a variety of traditional industries. As a result, electronic commerce develops rapidly. With the sustainable increase of consumers shopping online, the logistics problems have become the biggest obstacle of the development of electronic commerce. We argue that one can solve the current problems in logistics and improve consumers’ satisfaction by establishing a long-term relationship of value co-creation between electronic commerce enterprises and logistics service providers. In this paper, we build a game model of electronic commerce enterprises and logistics service providers based on knowledge-sharing. We analyze the cases of one-shot game and repeated game. According to model analysis, we propose strategies for electronic commerce enterprises and logistics service providers to co-create value on the basis of knowledge-sharing from two different angles, i.e., the whole supply chain’s and its members’ perspective. These strategies may have implications to practice.

Keywords

Knowledge sharing Value co-creation E-commerce enterprises Logistics service providers Game theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China through grant 71271164, and Humanities and Social Science Talent Plan in Shaanxi through grant ER42015060002, and partially supported by the Soft Science Research Program in Xi’an through grant BD33015060002.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernstein, F., Kök, A.G., et al.: Cooperation in assembly systems: the role of knowledge sharing networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240, 160–171 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Jing, X., Xie, J.: Group buying: a new mechanism for selling through social interactions. Manag. Sci. 57, 1354–1372 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Doorn, J., Lemon, K.N., et al.: Customer engagement behavior: theoretical foundations and research directions. J. Serv. Res. 13, 253–266 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ebrahim Khanjari, N., Hopp, W., et al.: Trust and information sharing in supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21, 444–464 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu, D., Ray, G., Whinston, A.B.: The interaction between knowledge codification and knowledge-sharing networks. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 892–906 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ben Letaifa, S., Reynoso, J.: Toward a service ecosystem perspective at the base of the pyramid. J. Serv. Manag. 26, 684–705 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Mezghania, E., Ernesto, E., et al.: A collaborative methodology for tacit knowledge management: application to scientific research. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 54, 450–455 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Özer, Ö., Zheng, Y., et al.: Trust in forecast information sharing. Manag. Sci. 57, 1111–1137 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pierce, L.: Organizational structure and the limits of knowledge sharing: incentive conflict and agency in car leasing. Manag. Sci. 58, 1106–1121 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Mark. 3, 5–14 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rahman, M.S., Osmangani, A.M., et al.: Trust and work place spirituality on knowledge sharing behaviour. Learn. Organ. 22, 317–332 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ren, Z.J., Cohen, M.A., et al.: Information sharing in a long-term supply chain relationship-the role of customer review strategy. Oper. Res. 58, 81–93 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    da Silva, A.S., Farina, M.C., et al.: A model of antecedents for the co-creation of value in health care an application of structural equation modeling. Braz. Bus. Rev. (Engl. Ed.) 12, 121–149 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    di Tollo, G., Tanev, S., et al.: Using online textual data, principal component analysis and artificial neural networks to study business and innovation practices in technology-driven firms. Comput. Ind. 74, 16–28 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vargo, S.L., et al.: On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 26, 145–152 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang, J., Yu, G., et al.: Improving LearningAlliance performance for manufacturers: does knowledge sharing matter? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 171, 301–308 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang, T.M., Wu, Y.J.: Exploring the determinants of cross-bboundary information sharing in the public sector: an e-government case study in Taiwan. J. Inf. Sci. 40, 649–668 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yuan, X., Olfman, L., et al.: How do institution-based trust and interpersonal trust affect interdepartmental knowledge sharing? Inf. Resour. Manag. J. 29, 15–38 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementXidian UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations