How Do Consumers Behave in Social Commerce? An Investigation Through Clickstream Data
The social commerce has received considerable attentions in both academia and practitioners in last decade. However, most of current studies investigated such topic from consumers’ psychological impetus, but lack of the objective evidence. In this work, we employed the clickstream data analysis to depict online consumers’ cross-site browsing behaviors in the context of social commerce. Four prominent clusters depicting distinctive consumers’ online browsing behaviors are found. Additionally, the consumers’ online behaviors characterized by the browsing patterns are also unveiled and discussed.
KeywordsSocial commerce Clickstream data Cluster analysis Chinese consumers
This work was partially supported by Program for Young Excellent Talents in Tongji University (2014KJ002), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2850219028), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 71532015).
- 5.Rubel, S.: Trends to watch part II: social commerce. Micro Persuasion Vom 2006, 23 (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Shen, J., Eder, L.B.: An examination of factors associated with user acceptance of social shopping websites. In: Mesquita, A. (ed.) User Perception and Influencing Factors of Technology in Everyday Life 28–45. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2012)Google Scholar
- 8.Grange, C., Benbasat, I.: Online social shopping: the functions and symbols of design artifacts. In: 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
- 14.CNNIC. Statistical Report on Internet Development in China (2015)Google Scholar
- 16.Elbaum, S., Karre, S., Rothermel, G.: Improving web application testing with user session data. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 49–59. IEEE Computer Society (2003)Google Scholar
- 17.Ghosh, S., Dubey, S.K.: Comparative analysis of k-means and fuzzy c-means algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 4(4), 34–39 (2013)Google Scholar