Women in Free/Libre/Open Source Software: The Situation in the 2010s

  • Gregorio RoblesEmail author
  • Laura Arjona Reina
  • Jesús M. González-Barahona
  • Santiago Dueñas Domínguez
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 472)


Women are underrepresented in the IT sector. But the situation in FLOSS (free, libre, open source software) development is really extreme in this respect: past publications and studies show a female participation of around 2 % to 5 % and have shed some light into this problem. In this paper, we give an update the state of knowledge to the current situation of gender in FLOSS, by analyzing the results of surveying more than 2,000 contributors to FLOSS projects in 2013, of which more than 200 were women. Our findings confirm that women enter the FLOSS community later than men, do primarily other tasks than coding, participate less if they have children, and have slightly different reasons to enter (and to stay in) the development communities they join. However, we also find evidence that women are joining FLOSS projects in higher numbers in recent years, and that the share of women devoting few hours per week to FLOSS and full-time dedication is higher than for men. All in all, comparing our results with the ones from the 2000s, the context of participation of women in FLOSS has not changed much.


Gender FLOSS Free software Open source Survey 


  1. 1.
    Adam, A.E.: Hacking into hacking: gender and the hacker phenomenon. ACM SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 33(4), 3 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bimber, B.: Measuring the gender gap on the internet. Soc. Sci. Q. 81(3), 868–876 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boivie, I.: Women, men and programming: knowledge, metaphors and masculinity. In: Gender Issues in Learning and Working with Information Technology: Social Constructs and Cultural Contexts, pp. 1–24 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blickenstaff, J.C.: Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gend. Educ. 17(4), 369–386 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    David, P.A., Shapiro, J.S.: Community-based production of open-source software: what do we know about the developers who participate? Inf. Econ. Policy 20(4), 364–398 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzgerald, B.: The transformation of open source software. Mis Q. 30, 587–598 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghosh, R.A., Glott, R., Krieger, B., Robles, G.: Free, libre, open source software: survey and study (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hill, C., Corbett, C., Rose, A.S.: Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. ERIC (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuechler, V., Gilbertson, C., Jensen, C.: Gender differences in early free and open source software joining process. In: Hammouda, I., Lundell, B., Mikkonen, T., Scacchi, W. (eds.) Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability. IFIP AICT, vol. 378, pp. 78–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Margolis, J., Fisher, A.: Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miliszewska, I., Barker, G., Henderson, F., Sztendur, E.: The issue of gender equity in computer science-what students say. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 5(1), 107–120 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nafus, D., Leach, J., Krieger, B.: Gender: Integrated report of findings. FLOSSPOLS, Deliverable D 16 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qiu, Y., Stewart, K.J., Bartol, K.M.: Joining and socialization in open source women’s groups: an exploratory study of KDE-Women. In: Ågerfalk, P., Boldyreff, C., González-Barahona, J.M., Madey, G.R., Noll, J. (eds.) OSS 2010. IFIP AICT, vol. 319, pp. 239–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robles, G., Reina, L.A., Serebrenik, A., Vasilescu, B., González-Barahona, J.M.: Floss 2013: a survey dataset about free software contributors: challenges for curating, sharing, and combining. In: MSR, pp. 396–399 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trauth, E.M., Quesenberry, J.L., Morgan, A.J.: Understanding the under representation of women in it: toward a theory of individual differences. In: Proceedings of 2004 SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research: Careers, Culture, and Ethics in a Networked Environment, pp. 114–119. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vasilescu, B., Capiluppi, A., Serebrenik, A.: Gender, representation and online participation: a quantitative study of stackoverflow. In: 2012 International Conference on Social Informatics (SocialInformatics), pp. 332–338. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregorio Robles
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laura Arjona Reina
    • 2
  • Jesús M. González-Barahona
    • 1
  • Santiago Dueñas Domínguez
    • 3
  1. 1.GSyC/LibreSoftUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain
  2. 2.Universidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.BitergiaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations