Advertisement

Looking to the Future of Hospital-Based HTA: The Next Frontier

  • Janet MartinEmail author
  • Laura Sampietro-Colom
Chapter

Abstract

This book represents the first attempt to provide a collated description of the global experience in hospital-based HTA across 18 countries and 6 continents. It is clear that there is an emerging global movement afoot to increase HTA activity at the local level in order to ensure that hospitals’ decision-making needs are addressed within required timelines and that relevant institutional considerations and other contextual issues are adequately addressed. Despite the growth of government-related and other external HTA agencies in recent decades, the persistent gap between production of arms-length HTA reports and relevance and timeliness for decision-makers in the real-world hospital setting has become increasingly clear. HB-HTA has been proposed as a solution to bridge this disconnection since local HTA can specifically address issues of relevance, context, and institutional decision-maker timelines. Furthermore, HB-HTA can serve as an ally for national/regional agencies in transferring nationally produced HTA information and guidance to the real-world setting, through proper adaptation to local context characteristics. For this reason, we have entitled the book The Next Frontier for HTA, insofar as HB-HTA represents the natural progression from arms-length HTA, to a locally integrated relevant HTA, which spans decision-makers and the knowledge translation context to improve HTA reach and overall impact.

Keywords

Knowledge Translation Early Assessment Evidence Synthesis Contextual Issue Local Evidence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Beer M (2001) Why management research findings are unimplementable: an action science perspective. Reflections 2(3):58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blomqvist A, Busby C, Husereau D (2013) Capturing value from health technologies in lean times. C.D. Howe Institute, Commentary N. 396. Available from: https://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/Commentary_396.pdf
  7. 7.
    Cicchetti A, Marchetti M, Iacopino V, D’Amico G, Sampietro-Colom L (2015) Organizational models of hospital based HTA: empirical evidence from Adhophta European Project. Value Health 18(7):A560–A561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Facey K, Henshall C, Sampietro-Colom L, Thomas S (2015) Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of evidence production for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 31(4):201–206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gagnon MP (2014) Hospital-based health technology assessment: developments to date. Pharmacoeconomics 32(9):819–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Poder T, Witteman W (2014) Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review. Syst Rev 3:129, Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4218945 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Walker AE, Thomas RE (2002) Changing physicians’ behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof 22(4):237–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kidholm K, Ølholm AM, Birk-Olsen M, Cicchetti A, Fure B, Halmesmäki E, Kahveci R, Kiivet RA, Wasserfallen JB, Wild C, Sampietro-Colom L (2015) Hospital managers’ need for information in decision-making – an interview study in nine European countries. Health Policy 119(11):1424–1432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lavis J, Ross S, McLeod C, Gildiner A (2003) Measuring the impact of health research. J Health Serv Res Policy 8:165–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martin J, Cheng D (2015) The real cost of care: focus on value for money, rather than price-tags. Can J Anaesth 62(10):1034–1037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin J, Polisena J, Dendukuri N, Rhainds M, Sampietro-Colom L (2016) Hospital and regional health technology assessment in Canada: current state and next steps. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1–6 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McGregor M (2006) What decision-makers want and what they have been getting. Value Health 9(3):181–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sampietro-Colom L, Lach K, Pasternack I, Wasserfallen JB, Cicchetti A, Marchetti M, Kidholm K, Arentz-Hansen H, Rosenmöller M, Wild C, Kahveci R, Ulst M (2015) Guiding principles for good practices in hospital-based health technology assessment units. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 31(6):457–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwartz S, Carpenter KM (1999) The right answer for the wrong question: consequences of type III error for public health research. Am J Public Health 89(8):1175–1180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I (2009) Defining knowledge translation. Can Med Assoc J 181(3–4):165–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG et al (2009) A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol 62(5):464–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Willging CE, Aarons GA, Trott EM, Green AE, Finn N, Ehrhart MG, Hecht DB (2016) Contracting and procurement for evidence-based interventions in public-sector human services: a case study. Adm Policy Ment Health. 43(5):675–692.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MEDICI Centre, Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative MedicineSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.Assessment of Innovations and New TechnologiesHospital Clinic BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations