A Learning Tool for the ISO/IEC 29110 Standard: Understanding the Project Management of Basic Profile

  • Mary-Luz Sánchez-Gordón
  • Rory V. O’Connor
  • Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
  • Sandra Sanchez-Gordon
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 609)

Abstract

The “best practices” of international software standards are considered important in improving the software process. The ISO/IEC 29110 standard defines lifecycle profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) and VSEs have also been recognized important in the software industry. Since this standard is novel, practitioners need to be actively engaged in their own learning. Serious games offer the potential not only to entertain and educate, but can also operate as a strategy for promoting the standard itself. The findings of this explorative study make possible an initial judgment about its potential as a fun standard learning tool as well as to analyze its pertinence, engagement, strengths, and weaknesses as guidance for further evolution.

Keywords

VSE ISO/IEC 29110 ISO Standards Process improvement Project management Serious game Learning tool 

References

  1. 1.
    Eurostat: annual enterprise statistics by size class for special aggregates of activities (NACE Rev. 2), http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/structural-business-statistics/data/database
  2. 2.
    ISO: software engineering – lifecycle profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) part 5-1-1: management and engineering guide: generic profile group: basic profile, Geneva (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanchez-Gordon, M.-L., O’Connor, R.V., Colomo-Palacios, R.: Evaluating VSEs viewpoint and sentiment towards the ISO/IEC 29110 standard: a two country grounded theory study. In: Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2015. CCIS, vol. 526, pp. 114–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: Business success in software SMEs: recommendations for future SPI studies. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2012. CCIS, vol. 301, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The influence of SPI on business success in software SMEs: an empirical study. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 2356–2367 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Connor, R.V., Basri, S.: Understanding the role of knowledge management in software development: a case study in very small companies. Int. J. Syst. Serv.-Oriented Eng. 4, 39–52 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Software project management in very small entities with ISO/IEC 29110. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2012. CCIS, vol. 301, pp. 330–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pino, F.J., García, F., Piattini, M.: Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: a systematic review. Softw. Qual. Control J. 16, 237–261 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Deploying lifecycle profiles for very small entities: an early stage industry view. In: O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., McCaffery, F., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2011. CCIS, vol. 155, pp. 227–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aydan, U., Yilmaz, M., O’Connor, R.V.: Towards a serious game to teach ISO/IEC 12207 software lifecycle process: an interactive learning approach. In: Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2015. CCIS, vol. 526, pp. 217–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zapata Jaramillo, C.M.: Teaching software development by means of a classroom game: the software development game. Dev. Bus. Simul. Exp. Learn. 36, 156–164 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kosa, M., Yilmaz, M.: Designing games for improving the software development process. In: O’Connor, R.V., et al. (eds.) EuroSPI 2015. CCIS, vol. 543, pp. 303–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Susi, T., Johannesson, M., Backlund, P.: Serious Games - An Overview. University of Skövde, Sweden (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., Berta, R.: Assessment in and of serious games: an overview. Adv. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2013, 1–11 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Deploying lifecycle profiles for very small entities: an early stage industry view. In: O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., McCaffery, F., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2011. CCIS, vol. 155, pp. 227–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Connor, R., Laporte, C.Y.: Using ISO/IEC 29110 to harness process improvement in very small entities. In: O‘Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds.) 18th European Software Process Improvement Conference on Workshop on SPI in SMEs, pp. 225–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Towards the provision of assistance for very small entities in deploying software lifecycle standards. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Product Focused Software (PROFES 2010), pp. 4–7. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coleman, G., O’Connor, R.: Investigating software process in practice: a grounded theory perspective. J. Syst. Softw. 81, 772–784 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Connor, R., Coleman, G.: Ignoring “Best Practice”: why irish software SMEs are rejecting CMMI and ISO 9000. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 16, 7–30 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sánchez-Gordón, M.-L., O’Connor, R.V.: Understanding the gap between software process practices and actual practice in very small companies. Softw. Qual. J. 1–22 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moreno-Campos, E., Sanchez-Gordón, M.-L., Colomo-Palacios, R., de Amescua Seco, A.: Towards measuring the impact of the ISO/IEC 29110 standard: a systematic review. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2014. CCIS, vol. 425, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: An innovative approach to the development of an international software process lifecycle standard for very small entities. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Syst. Approach 7, 1–22 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laporte, C.Y., O’Connor, R., Fanmuy, G.: International systems and software engineering standards for very small entities. CrossTalk – J. Defense Softw. Eng. 26, 28–33 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO): software engineering — lifecycle profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) — Part 5-1-1: management and engineering guide: generic profile group: entry profile, Geneva (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laporte, C.Y.: Contributions to software engineering and the development and deployment of international software engineering standards for very small entities (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Monsalve, E.S., do Prado Leite, J.C.S., Werneck, V.M.B.: Transparently teaching in the context of game-based learning: the case of simulES-W. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 343–352. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zapata-Jaramillo, C.M., Lopez, M.D.R., Sanchez, R.E.A., Pinzon, L.D.J.: SEMAT GAME: applying a project management practice. Dev. Bus. Simul. Exp. Learn. 42, 133–143 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jacobson, I., Ng, P.-W., McMahon, P.E., Spence, I., Lidman, S.: The Essence of Software Engineering: Applying the SEMAT Kernel. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adams, E.: Fundamentals of Game Design, 2nd edn. New Riders, Berkeley (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abuhamdeh, S., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated. Goal-Directed Activities Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38, 317–330 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ross, S.M.: Peirce’s criterion for the elimination of suspect experimental data. J. Eng. Technol. 20, 38–41 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary-Luz Sánchez-Gordón
    • 1
  • Rory V. O’Connor
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ricardo Colomo-Palacios
    • 4
  • Sandra Sanchez-Gordon
    • 5
  1. 1.Universidad Carlos III de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Lero, The Irish Software Research CentreLimerickIreland
  3. 3.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland
  4. 4.Ostfold University CollegeHaldenNorway
  5. 5.Escuela Politecnica NacionalQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations