Commentary on Interdisciplinary Perspectives to Creativity and Giftedness

  • Bharath SriramanEmail author
  • Roza Leikin
Part of the Advances in Mathematics Education book series (AME)


In this commentary, we analyze the 14 chapters of the book for interdisciplinary themes that unravel and are applicable to mathematics education. In particular, attention is given to interdisciplinary perspectives on the constructs of creativity and giftedness. Dominant themes from clusters of chapters are highlighted.


Mathematical giftedness Creativity Psychology of creativity Creativity in mathematics education Mathematical creativity Research advances 


  1. Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Feldhusen, J. F., & Westby, E. L. (2003). Creative and affective behavior: Cognition, personality and motivation. In J. Houtz (Ed.), The educational psychology of creativity (pp. 95–105). Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  3. Haavold, P. (2016). An empirical investigation of a theoretical model for mathematical creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior. Wiley Online. URL: Retrieved on 25 March, 2016.
  4. Kattou, M., Kontoyianni, K., Pitta-Pantazi, & Christou, C. (2013). Connecting mathematical creativity to mathematical ability. ZDM, 45(2), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Creativity. Change, 39(4), 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference? ZDM, 45(2), 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (Eds.). (2009). Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
  9. National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London: DfEE.Google Scholar
  10. Pitta-Pantazi, D., Sophocleous, P., & Christou, C. (2013). Spatial visualizers, object visualizers and verbalizers: Their mathematical creative abilities. ZDM, 45(2), 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1996). The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In A. I. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 49–82). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Sriraman, B. (2005). Are mathematical giftedness and mathematical creativity synonyms? A theoretical analysis of constructs. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20–36.Google Scholar
  13. Sriraman, B., & Haavold, P. (in press). Creativity and giftedness in mathematics education: A pragmatic view. In J. Cai (Ed.), First compendium for research in mathematics education. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  14. Sriraman, B., & Lande, D. (in press). “Integrating” creativity and technology through interpolation. In V. Freiman & J. Tassell (Eds.), Creativity and technology in mathematics education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Education, RANGE CenterUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations