Advertisement

Psychological and Neuroscientific Perspectives on Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness

  • David H. CropleyEmail author
  • Martin Westwell
  • Florence Gabriel
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Mathematics Education book series (AME)

Abstract

Creativity and giftedness have long been linked together in the literature, particularly where giftedness is conceived, not in the analytically focused sense of schoolhouse giftedness (e.g. Renzulli 1978), but in the sense of creative-productive giftedness that emphasizes the generation and production of ideas. Creativity has a well-established foundation in the psychological literature, and a growing body of work derived from neuroscientific approaches. How do these contrasting psychological and neuroscientific approaches inform our understanding of creativity as a component of giftedness in general? How is giftedness manifest in mathematics in the creative-productive sense? What do psychology and neuroscience tell us about the process of fostering mathematical giftedness specifically?

In this chapter, we examine first general aspects of creativity and giftedness, noting that Treffinger’s (2004) five themes provide a framework for understanding the connection between creativity and giftedness. Having established that creativity and giftedness are connected through these five themes, we then turn attention first to a psychological view of factors that are important for understanding mathematical creativity and giftedness, followed by a neuroscientific examination of the same.

The chapter concludes with the notion that mathematical creativity and giftedness can be thought of as a special case of the intersection of creativity and giftedness more generally, and that creativity and giftedness – mathematical or otherwise – can be characterized by a series of dualities. Elements of the person, the cognitive processes employed, the outcome and the environment associated with mathematical creativity and giftedness are unique to this domain, and the blending of psychological and neuroscientific approaches offers the best means for understanding and fostering this ability.

Keywords

Creativity Giftedness Mathematics Psychology Neuroscience 

References

  1. Arden, R., Chavez, R. S., Grazioplene, R., & Jung, R. E. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: A psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research, 214(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, J. M. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, J. M. (2010). Is creativity domain specific? In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 321–341). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer, J. M. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baer, J. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barron, F. X. (1955). The disposition toward originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 6(4), 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Wilkins, R. W., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Silvia, P. J., … Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest. Neuropsychologia, 64, 92–98.Google Scholar
  9. Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88, 125–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, N. R., Croft, R. J., Dominey, S. J., Burgess, A. P., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2003). Paradox lost? Exploring the role of alpha oscillations during externally vs. internally directed attention and the implications for idling and inhibition hypotheses. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 47(1), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, N. R., Burgess, A. P., Croft, R. J., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2006). Investigating evoked and induced electroencephalogram activity in task-related alpha power increases during an internally directed attention task. Neuroreport, 17(2), 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cropley, A. J. (1994). Creative intelligence: A concept of ‘true’ giftedness. European Journal for High Ability, 5(1), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cropley, D. H. (2015). Creativity in engineering: Novel solutions to complex problems. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: Non-expert raters and the creative solution diagnosis scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(2), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cropley, A. J., & Urban, K. K. (2000). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In F. J. M. K. A. Heller, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 481–484). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  17. Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2011). Measuring creativity for innovation management. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delcourt, M. A. (1993). Creative productivity among secondary school students: Combining energy, interest, and imagination. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1011–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2006). EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: Differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(1), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fink, A., & Benedek, M. (2014). EEG alpha power and creative ideation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Hutterer, L., Steiner, E., Benedek, M., Weber, B., … Weiss, E. M. (2014). Gray matter density in relation to different facets of verbal creativity. Brain Structure and Function, 219(4), 1263–1269.Google Scholar
  24. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gonen-Yaacovi, G., de Souza, L. C., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013). Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta-analysis of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 465–486.Google Scholar
  26. Gross, M. U. M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14(8), 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howard-Jones, P. A., Blakemore, S.-J., Samuel, E. A., Summers, I. R., & Claxton, G. (2005). Semantic divergence and creative story generation: An fMRI investigation. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 240–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85(2), 665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  33. Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Russell, C. M. (2012). Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ludwig, A. M. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy, M. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2009). A culture of genius: How an organization’s lay theory shapes people’s cognition, affect, and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Naglieri, J. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2001). Understanding intelligence, giftedness and creativity using the PASS theory. Roeper Review, 23(3), 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Neubauer, A. C., & Fink, A. (2009). Intelligence and neural efficiency. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(7), 1004–1023. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive‐social‐motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 248–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180–184.Google Scholar
  44. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Renzulli, J. S. (2011). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition: Giftedness needs to be redefined to include three elements: Above-average intelligence, high levels of task commitment, and high levels of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(8), 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.Google Scholar
  47. Runco, M. A. (1993). Divergent thinking, creativity, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sawyer, K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004a). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004b). Types of creativity training: Approaches and their effectiveness. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(3), 149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sriraman, B. (Ed.). (2008). Creativity, giftedness, and talent development in mathematics. Charlotte: IAP.Google Scholar
  52. Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Creativity as a habit. In A.-G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp. 3–25). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1993). Creative giftedness: A multivariate investment approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Treffinger, D. J. (2004). Introduction to creativity and giftedness: Three decades of inquiry and development. In D. J. Treffinger (Ed.), Creativity and giftedness. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press and the National Association for Gifted Children.Google Scholar
  56. Treffinger, D. J., & Reis, S. M. (2004). Creativity and giftedness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  57. Treffinger, D. J., Sortore, M. R., & Cross, J. A. (1993). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook for research on giftedness and talent (pp. 555–567). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  58. Wallach, M. A. (1985). Creativity testing and giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 99–123). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yoruk, S., & Runco, M. (2014). The neuroscience of divergent thinking. ANS: The Journal for Neurocognitive Research, 56(1–2), 1–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • David H. Cropley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Westwell
    • 2
  • Florence Gabriel
    • 2
  1. 1.University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Flinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations