Advertisement

Do RCMs Accurately Simulate the Etesians Climatology?

  • S. Dafka
  • A. Toreti
  • J. Luterbacher
  • P. Zanis
  • E. Tyrlis
  • E. Xoplaki
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Atmospheric Sciences book series (SPRINGERATMO)

Abstract

An evaluation of the high spatial resolution, EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Models (RCMs) is presented here. The study documents the performance of the individual models in simulating the Etesian wind system over the Aegean Sea and the associated large scale atmospheric circulation during the extended summer season May to September from 1989 to 2004. The model outputs are validated against reanalysis datasets (20CRv2c and ERA20C) and daily observational measurements from the mainland Greece and Aegean Sea. The analysis highlights the ability of the RCMs to capture the basic characteristics of the Etesians, indicating small biases (differences) when compared with station series (reanalyses). For instance, ALADIN and ARPEGE generally underestimate the mean wind speed at most stations, while WRF provides better skills in this respect compared to other models. All models provide a good depiction of the atmospheric circulation associated with intense Etesians both at the surface and at 500 hPa.

Keywords

Wind Speed Large Scale Atmospheric Circulation Good Skill Surface Wind Field Good Depiction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the National Centre for Meteorological Research of France, the Danish Meteorological Institute, the Institute Pierre Simon Laplace and the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute for providing the RCMs data. The research leading to these results has received funding from the Greek State Scholarships Foundation. We are indebted to the Hellenic National Meteorological Service for the observational dataset.

References

  1. Ardhuin F, Bertotti L, Bidlot JR, Cavaleri L, Filipetto V, Lefevre JM, Wittmann P (2007) Comparison of wind and wave measurements and models in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Ocean Eng 34(3–4):526–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloom A, Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K (2008) Climate change impact of wind energy availability in the Eastern Mediterranean using the regional climate model PRECIS. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:1249–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brossier C, Béranger K, Deltel C, Drobinski P (2011) The Mediterranean response to different space-time resolution atmospheric forcings using perpetual mode sensitivity simulations. Ocean Model 36:1–25. doi: 10.16/j.ocemod.2010.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Compo GP et al (2011) The twentieth century reanalysis project. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dafka S, Xoplaki E, Toreti A, Zanis P, Tyrlis E, Zerefos C, Luterbacher J (2015) The Etesians: from observations to reanalysis. Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-015-2920-7 Google Scholar
  6. Dee DP et al (2011) The ERA-Interim re-analysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feser F, Rockel B, von Storch H, Winterfeldt J, Zahn M (2011) Regional climate models add value to global model data–a review and selected examples. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 92:1181–1192. doi: 10.1175/2011BAMS3061.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. García-Bustamante E, González-Rouco JF, Jiménez PA, Navarro J, Montávez JP (2009) A comparison of methodologies for monthly wind energy estimation. Wind Energy 12:640–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giorgi F, Jones C, Asrar GR (2006) Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework. Bull World Meteorol Organ 58:175–183Google Scholar
  10. Herrmann M, Somot S, Calmanti S, Dubois C, Sevault F (2011) Representation of spatial and temporal variability of daily wind speed and of intense wind events over the Mediterranean Sea using dynamical downscaling: impact of the regional climate model configuration. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1983–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kunz M, Mohr S, Rauthe M, Lux R, Kottmeier C (2010) Assessment of extreme wind speeds from regional climate models-part 1: estimation of return values and their evaluation Nat. Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:907–922. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-907-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Poli P et al (2013) The data assimilation system and initial performance evaluation of the ECMWF pilot reanalysis of the 20th-century assimilating surface observations only (ERA-20C). ERA Report Series no. 14, ECMWF, 59pGoogle Scholar
  13. Rockel B, Woth K (2007) Extremes of near-surface wind speed over Europe and their future changes as estimated from an ensemble of RCM simulations. Clim Change 81:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sikiric DM, Janekovic I, Tomazic I, Kuzmic M, Roland A (2015) A comparison of ALADIN and IFS model wind speeds over the Adriatic. Acta Adriatica (0001-5113) 56:67–82Google Scholar
  15. Zerefos C (1978) Surface wind energy density over eastern Greece. Arch Meteorol Geophys Bioklimatol Ser B 26:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Dafka
    • 1
  • A. Toreti
    • 2
  • J. Luterbacher
    • 1
  • P. Zanis
    • 3
  • E. Tyrlis
    • 4
  • E. Xoplaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Climatology, Climate Dynamics and Climate Change, Department of GeographyJustus-Liebig-University of GiessenGiessenGermany
  2. 2.European Commission, Joint Research CentreIspraItaly
  3. 3.Department of Meteorology and Climatology, School of GeologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  4. 4.Energy, Environment and Water Research CenterThe Cyprus InstituteAglantziaCyprus

Personalised recommendations