Advertisement

Evaluation of a Coupled Mesoscale Meteorology and Chemistry Model Over the Mediterranean

  • D. G. Amanatidis
  • S. Myriokefalitakis
  • N. Daskalakis
  • M. KanakidouEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Atmospheric Sciences book series (SPRINGERATMO)

Abstract

The performance of the coupled mesoscale meteorology and chemistry model WRF/CHEM to simulate the atmospheric composition over the Mediterranean is here evaluated. The model configuration applied for this study uses the gas phase chemical mechanism Mozart and a spatial resolution of 36 × 36 km, which nests in lower resolutions (12 × 12 km and 7.2 × 7.2 km). Anthropogenic surface emissions developed in the frame of the ECLIPSE EU FP7 project and biomass burning emissions from the FINN database are used. Mineral dust aerosol emissions are derived from the GOCART dust model and biogenic emissions are calculated online by the MEGAN model. The global 3-dimensional chemistry-transport model TM4-ECPL is providing the initial and boundaries chemical conditions for the coarse resolution mesoscale model. The results show that the mesoscale model overestimates O3 surface levels at most stations by up to about 70 % and underestimates CO surface levels by up to about 25 %. Strong correlations between simulations and observations are computed for 60 % of the studied O3 stations and 20 % of the studied CO stations. No significant change in the model performance as a function of the studied model resolutions was found.

Keywords

Tropospheric Ozone Representative Concentration Pathway Biogenic Emission Biomass Burning Emission Mineral Dust Aerosol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amann M et al (2011) Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: modeling and policy applications. EMS 26(12):1489–1501. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.012 Google Scholar
  2. Chin M et al (2002) Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the gocart model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements. J Atmos Sci 59:461–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Emmons LK et al (2010) Description and evaluation of the model for ozone and related chemical tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4). Geosci Model Dev 3:43–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grell GA et al (2005) Fully coupled online chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos Environ 39:6957–6975. doi: 10.5194/acp-14-10119-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guenther A et al (2006) Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmos Chem Phys 6:3181–3210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hjellbrekke A, Solberg S, Fjæraa AM (2012) Ozone measurements 2010 EMEP/CCC-Report 2/2012 available at: http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/reports/cccr2-2012.pdf
  7. Hodnebrog M et al (2012) Impact of forest fires, biogenic emissions and high temperatures on the elevated Eastern Mediterranean ozone levels during the hot summer of 2007. Atmos Chem Phys 12:8727–8750. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-8727-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Im U et al (2011) The impact of temperature changes on summer time ozone and its precursors in the Eastern Mediterranean. Atmos Chem Phys 11:3847–3864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kanakidou M et al (2011) Megacities as hot spots of air pollution in the East Mediterranean Atmospheric Environment. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.048 Google Scholar
  10. Kouvarakis G et al (2000) Temporal variations of surface regional background ozone over Crete Island in the southeast Mediterranean. J Geophys Res 105:4399–4407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Myriokefalitakis S et al (2011) In-cloud oxalate formation in the global troposphere: a 3-D modeling study Atmos. Chem Phys 11:5761–5782Google Scholar
  12. van Vuuren DP et al. (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change 109:5–31.  10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z
  13. von Glasow R et al (2013) Megacities and large urban agglomerations in the coastal zone: interactions between atmosphere, land, and marine ecosystems. Ambio 42(1):13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wiedinmyer C et al (2011) The Fire Inventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning. Geosci. Model Dev 4:625–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. Amanatidis
    • 1
  • S. Myriokefalitakis
    • 1
  • N. Daskalakis
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Kanakidou
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Environmental Chemical Processes Laboratory, Department of ChemistryUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece
  2. 2.LATMOS, CNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations