Advertisement

Internet and Loss of Control in an Era of Big Data and Mass Surveillance

  • Hielke Hijmans
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 31)

Abstract

This chapter describes certain developments in the internet economy and in communications on the internet that affect the safeguarding of privacy and data protection of individuals and identifies challenges for privacy and data protection on the internet. It depicts the internet as a single unfragmented space with a loose government structure. Freedom on the internet is a great good, yet it is under threat in a reality where big companies and governments exercise wide powers.

Keywords

Personal Data Data Protection Information Society Network Society United Nations High Commissioner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, Janna, and Lee Rainee. 2014. Net threats, experts say liberty online is challenged by nation-state crackdowns, surveillance, and pressures of commercialization of the Internet, Pew Research Center. Available on: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/07/03/net-threats/.
  2. Belli, Luca, and Primavera De Filippi (eds). 2013. The value of network neutrality for the internet of tomorrow. Report of the Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality. Available on: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01026096
  3. Benkler, Yochai. 2011. Networks of power, degrees of freedom. International Journal of Communication 5: 721–755.Google Scholar
  4. Bernal, P. 2014. Internet privacy rights, rights to protect autonomy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bygrave, Lee A. 2014. Data privacy law, an international perspective. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castells, Manuel. 2009. The rise of the network society, volume I: The information age: Economy, society and culture. 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, Manuel. 2011. A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication 5: 773–787.Google Scholar
  8. Center for Democracy and Technology. 2011. Regardless of frontiers: The international right to freedom of expression in the digital age. Discussion Draft Version 0.5, April 2011.Google Scholar
  9. Chander, Anupam, and Uyên P. Lê. 2014. Data nationalism. Emory Law Journal 2014(3): 678–739.Google Scholar
  10. Dijck, José van. 2014. Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society 12(2): 197–208.Google Scholar
  11. Economist. A special report on cyber security, defending the digital frontier. Issue 12 July 2014.Google Scholar
  12. Eeten, Michel J.G., and Milton Mueller. 2013. Where is the governance in internet governance? New Media & Society 15(5): 720–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eggers, Dave. 2013. The Circle. Random House LLC.Google Scholar
  14. Einav, Liran, and Jonathan D. Levin. 2013. The data revolution and economic analysis. NBER working paper, No. 19035.Google Scholar
  15. Foreign Fighters under International Law. 2014. Academia briefing no 7, Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, October 2014.Google Scholar
  16. Galetta, Antonella, and Paul De Hert. 2014. Complementing the surveillance law principles of the ECtHR with its environmental law principles: An integrated technology approach to a human rights framework for surveillance. Utrecht Law Review 10(Issue 1): 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geradin, Damien, and Monika Kuschewsky. 2013. Competition law and personal data: Preliminary thoughts on a complex issue. Discussion Papers Tilburg Law and Economics Center, DP 2013-010.Google Scholar
  18. Greenwald, Glenn. 2014. No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA and the surveillance state. Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, Jeremy, and Philip Rosson. 2006. The impact of technological turbulence on entrepreneurial behavior, social norms and ethics: Three internet-based cases. Journal of Business Ethics 64: 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hijmans, Hielke. 2014. Right to have links removed: Evidence of effective data protection. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2014(3), 555–563.Google Scholar
  21. Hijmans, Hielke, and Herke Kranenborg (eds). 2014. Data protection Anno 2014: How to restore trust? Contributions in honour of Peter Hustinx, European Data Protection Supervisor (2004–2014), Intersentia.Google Scholar
  22. Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review 97(2): 233–243.Google Scholar
  23. Internet Governance Forum. 2014. The global multistakeholder forum for dialogue on internet governance issues. Available on: http://intgovforum.org/cms/2014/IGFBrochure.pdf.
  24. Irion, K., and P. Valcke. 2014. Cultural diversity in the digital age: EU competences, policies and regulations for diverse audiovisual and online content. In Cultural governance and the European Union, ed. E. Psychogiopoulou. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2006. Suing for Europe, adversarial legalism and european governance. Comparative Political Studies 39(1): 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuner, Christopher. 2007. European data protection law, corporate compliance and regulation, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kuner, Christopher, Fred H. Cate, Christopher Millard, Dan Jerker B. Svantesson, and Orla Lynskey. 2015. Internet Balkanization gathers pace: is privacy the real driver?, International Data Privacy Law 5(1): 1–2.Google Scholar
  28. Kurbalija, Jovan. 2014. Introduction to internet governance, 6th ed. DiploFoundation.Google Scholar
  29. Lenaerts, Koen, Ignace Maselis, and Kathleen Gutman. 2014. EU procedural law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Special issue: “The Constitutional Adulthood of Multi-Level Governance”, 2014, Vol. 21, No. 2Google Scholar
  31. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor, and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  32. Mazower, Mark. 2012. Governing the world: The history of an idea. Penguin Putnam Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Milanovic, Marko. 2015. Human rights treaties and foreign surveillance: Privacy in the digital age. Harvard International Law Journal 56: 81–146.Google Scholar
  34. Murphy, Erin. 2013. The politics of privacy in the criminal justice system: Information disclosure, the fourth amendment, and statutory law enforcement exemptions. Michigan Law Review 111(4): 485–546.Google Scholar
  35. Nissenbaum, Helen. 2010. Privacy in context. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Peers, Steve, Tamara Hervey, Jeff Kenner, and Angela Ward (eds). 2014. The EU charter of fundamental rights, a commentary. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Read, Darren. 2012. Net neutrality and the EU electronic communications regulatory framework. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 20(1): 48–72.Google Scholar
  38. Reidenberg, Joel. 1996. Governing networks and cyberspace rule-making. Emory Law Journal 45: 911.Google Scholar
  39. Reidenberg, Joel. 2013. The data surveillance state in the United States and Europe. Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2349269. Princeton University – Center for Information Technology Policy/Fordham University School of Law, Wake Forest Law Review, November 2013.Google Scholar
  40. Reidenberg, Joel R. a.o. 2013. Internet jurisdiction, survey of legal scholarship. Published in English and United States Case Law, Fordham Center on Law and Information Policy.Google Scholar
  41. Rubinstein, Ira, and Joris Van Hoboken. 2014. Privacy and security in the cloud: Some realism about technical solutions to transnational surveillance in the post-Snowden Era. Maine Law Review 66: 488–533.Google Scholar
  42. Rule, James, Douglas McAdam, Linda Stearns, and David Uglow. 1980. The politics of privacy, planning for personal data systems as powerful technologies. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  43. Ryngaert, Cedric. 2007. Jurisdiction in international law, United States and European perspectives. Dissertation KU Leuven.Google Scholar
  44. Schmidt, Eric, and Jared Cohen. 2015. The new digital age. Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  45. Schneier, Bruce. 2015. Data and Goliath. W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  46. Sponselee, Annika. 2015. Privacy with a view – part II. Privacy & Practice 01-02/2015, 71–78.Google Scholar
  47. Surveillance Studies Network. 2006. A report on the surveillance society. Report for the Information Commissioner. Available on:https://ico.org.uk/media/about-the-ico/documents/1042390/surveillance-society-full-report-2006.pdf.
  48. Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. 2013. Extraterritoriality in data privacy law. Ex Tuto Publishing.Google Scholar
  49. Westin, Alan F. 1967. Privacy and freedom. Atheneum.Google Scholar
  50. Wu, Tim. 2003. Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law 2: 141–179.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hielke Hijmans
    • 1
  1. 1.BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations