Latino Group Identity: Measuring a Moving Target

  • Angel Saavedra Cisneros
Chapter

Abstract

This is the first chapter in the third section of the book, which explores Latino panethnic identity and its relationship to partisanship. In this chapter, the author theoretically and statistically develops a measure of Latino panethnic identity using the LNS 2006 and LNS New England. Using covariance structure analysis, the author proposes a measure of Latino panethnic identity that is composed of both home country and Latino superordinate identity. This solidifies the view that Latinos generally possess a complex social identity. The analyses show that linked fate is not the only important component for Latino politics. The scale developed shows good properties and allows for the testing of the identity-to-partisanship link. The chapter also presents religion as an important identity for Latino politics.

Keywords

Social Identity Ethnic Identity Group Identity English Proficiency Religious Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Abrajano, Marisa A., and Michael Alvarez. 2010. New Faces, New Voices. The Hispanic Electorate in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Richard L., Michael C. Dawson, and Ronald E. Brown. 1989. A Schema-Based Approach to Modeling an African-American Racial Belief System. The American Political Science Review 83(2): 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barreto, Matt A. 2010. Ethnic Cues, the Role of Shared Ethnicity in Latino Poitical Participation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beltrán, Cristina. 2010. The Trouble with Unity: Latino Politics and the Creation of Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bowler, Shaun, P. Nicholson, P. Stephen, and Gary M. Segura. 2006. Earthquakes and Aftershocks: Race, Direct Democracy, and Partisan Change. American Journal of Political Science 50: 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branton, Regina. 2007. Latino Attitudes Toward Various Areas of Public Policy: The Importance of Acculturation. Political Research Quarterly 60: 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer, Marilynn B. 1999. Multiple Identities and Identity Transition: Implications for Hong Kong. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 23(2): 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer, Marilynn B. 2003. Optimal Distinctiveness, Social Identity, and the Self. In Handbook of Self and Identity, eds. M. Leary and J. Tangney, 480–491. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. ——— 2007. The Importance of Being “We”: Human Nature and Intergroup Relations. American Psychologist 62(8): 728–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carey, Tony E. Jr., Regina P. Branton, and Valerie Martínez-Ebers. 2014. The Influence of Social Protests on Issue Salience among Latinos. Political Research Quarterly 67: 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandra, Kanchan. 2006. What is Ethnic Identity and Does it Matter? Annual Review of Political Science 9(1): 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2012. Constructivist Theories of Ethnic Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chong, Dennis, and Dukhong Kim. 2006. The Experiences and Effects of Economic Status among Racial and Ethnic Minorities. The American Political Science Review 100(3): 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conover, Pamela J. 1984. The Influence of Group Identifications on Political Perception and Evaluation. The Journal of Politics 46(3): 760–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson, Michael C. 1994. Behind the Mule Race and Class in African American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. de la Garza, R.O., and J. Cortina. 2007. Are Latinos Republicans But Just Don’t Know It?: The Latino Vote in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections. American Politics Research 35(2): 202–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellemers, Naomi, Russell Spears, and Bertjan Doosje. 2002. Self and Social Identity. Annual Review of Psychology 53(1): 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emeka, Amon, and Jody Agius Vallejo. 2011. Non-Hispanics with Latin American Ancestry: Assimilation, Race, and Identity Among Latin American Descendants in the US. Social Science Research 40: 1547–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ethier, K.A., and K. Deaux. 1994. Negotiation Social Identity When Contexts Change: Maintaining Identification and Responding to Threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraga, Luis R., J.A. García, R.E. Hero, M. Jones-Correa, V.M. Ebers, and G. Segura. 2010. Latino Lives in América: Making it Home. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gaertner, Samuel L., and John F. Dovidio. 2000. Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press of Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  22. García, John A. 1982. Ethnicity and Chicanos: Explorations into the Measurement of Ethnic Identification, Identity and Consciousness. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 4(3): 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. García, John A. 2003. Latino Politics in America: Community, Culture and Interests. Lahman, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  24. Garcia, John A. 2010. Understanding Multiple Social Identities among Latinos: Social-Cultural Connections to Latino Pan-ethnic Identity. Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association meeting, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  25. García Bedolla, Lisa. 2003. The Identity Paradox: Latino Language, Politics and Selective Dissociation. Latino Studies 1(2): 264–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2005. Fluid Borders: Hispanic Power, Identity and Politics in Los Angeles. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gibson, Troy, and Christopher Hare. 2012. Do Latino Christians and Seculars Fit the Culture War Profile? Latino Religiosity and Political Behavior. Politics and Religion 5: 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gimpel, James G. and Kauffman, K. 2001 Impossible Dream or Distant Reality? Republican Efforts to Attract Latino Voters. Backgrounder, Center for Immigration Studies. Available online at: http://cis.org/RepublicanEffortAttractLatinoVoters
  29. González, Roberto, and Rupert Brown. 2003. Generalization of Positive Attitude as a Function of Subgroup and Superordinate Group Identifications in Intergroup Contact. European Journal of Social Psychology 33: 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Green, Donald P., Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hornsey, Matthew J., and Michael A. Hogg. 2000. Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(2): 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huddy, Leonie. 2001. From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory. Political Psychology 22: 127–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jenkins, Richard. 1994. Rethinking Ethnicity: Identity, Categorization and Power. Ethnic and Racial Studies 17: 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Junn, Jane, Tali Mendelberg, and Erica Czaj. 2012. Race and the Group Bases of Public Opinion. In New Directions in Public Opinion, Ch. 6, ed. Adam Berinsky. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Kelly, Nathan J., and Jana M. Kelly. 2005. Religion and Latino Partisanship in the United States. Political Research Quarterly 58(1): 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klandermans, Bert. 2013. Dual Identity. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Retrieved online. doi: 10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm076.
  37. Klandermans, P.G. 2014. Identity Politics and Politicized Identities: Political Processes and the Dynamics of Protest. Political Psychology 35(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lavariega-Monforti, Jessica, Melissa Michelson, and Annie Franco. 2013. ¿Por Quién Votará? Experimental Evidence About Language, Ethnicity and Vote Choice (Among Republicans). Politics, Groups, and Identities 1(4): 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Layman, Geoffrey C. 1997. Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact of Beliefs, Affiliations, and Commitment from 1980 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly 61(2): 288–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Layman, Geoffrey C 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., William G. Jacoby, Hemult Norpoth, and Herbert F. Weisberg. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lien, Pei-Te. 1994. Ethnicity and Political Participation: A Comparison Between Asian and Mexican-Americans. Political Behavior 16: 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Masuoka, Natalie. 2006. Together they Become One: Examining the Predictors of Panethnic Group Consciousness Among Asian Americans and Latinos. Social Science Quarterly 87: 991–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Masuoka, Natalie, and Jane Junn. 2013. The Politics of Belonging: Race, Public Opinion, and Immigration. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McClain, Paula D., J.D. Johnson Carew, E. Walton Jr., and C.S. Watts. 2009. Group Membership, Group Identity, and Group Consciousness: Measures of Racial Identity in American Politics? Annual Review of Political Science 12: 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McDaniel, Eric L., and Christopher G. Ellison. 2008. God’s Party? Race, Religion, and Partisanship Over Time. Political Research Quarterly 61: 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Michelson, Melissa R., and Lisa Garcia Bedolla. 2014. Mobilization by Different Means: Nativity and GOTV. International Migration Review 48(3): 710–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Min, Tae Eun. 2010. Panethnicity Among Asian Americans and Latinos: Panethnicity as Both a Dependent Variable and Independent Variable. PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, University of Iowa. http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/713.
  49. ———. 2014. The Impact of Panethnicity on Asian American and Latino Political Participation. Ethnicities 14(5): 698–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Monsivais, G.I. 2004. Hispanic Immigrant Identity: Political Allegiance vs. Cultural Preference. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Nicholson, Stephen P., and Gary Segura. 2005. Agenda Change and the Politics of Latino Partisan Identification. In Diversity in Democracy: Minority Representation in the United States, eds. Gary M. Segura and Shaun Bowler. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pérez, Efrén O. 2014. Xenophobic Rhetoric and Its Political Effects on Immigrants and Their Co-Ethnics. American Journal of Political Science, Early View 59(3): 549–564. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Portes, Alejandro, Cristina Escobar, and Renelinda Arana. 2008. Bridging the Gap: Transnational and Ethnic Organizations in the Political Incorporation of Immigrants in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies 31: 1056–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Portes, Alejandro, and M. Zhou. 1993. The New Second Generation: Segmented-Assimilation and Its Variants. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 530: 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reicher, Stephen. 2004. The Context of Social Identity: Domination, Resistance, and Change. Political Psychology 25(6): 921–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roccas, Sonia, and Marilynn B. Brewer. 2002. Social Identity Complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6(2): 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rumbaut, Ruben G. 1994. The Crucible Within: Ethnic Identity, Self-Esteem, and Segmented Assimilation Among Children of Immigrants. International Migration Review 28: 748–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sanchez, Gabriel R. 2006. The Role of Group Consciousness in Latino Public Opinion. Political Research Quarterly 59: 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sanchez, Gabriel R., and Natalie Masuoka. 2010. Brown-Utility Heuristic? The Presence and Contributing Factors of Latino Linked Fate. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 32: 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sanchez, Gabriel R., and Edward D. Vargas. 2016. Taking a Closer Look at Group Identity: The Link between Theory and Measurement of Group Consciousness and Linked Fate. Political Research Quarterly, doi: 10.1177/1065912915624571.
  61. Sen, Maya, and Omar Wasow. 2014. Race as a ‘Bundle of Sticks’: Designs that Estimate Effects of Seemingly Immutable Characteristics. http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/race_causality.pdf?m=1412546675. Accessed 30 Jan 2016.
  62. Silber-Mohamed, Heather. 2013. Can Protests Make Latinos “American”? Identity, Immigration Politics, and the 2006 Marches. American Politics Research 41: 298–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simon, Bernd, and Bert Klandermans. 2001. Politicized Collective Identity: A Social Psychological Analysis. American Psychologist 56: 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stokes, Atiya Kai. 2003. Latino Group Consciousness and Political Participation. American Politics Research 31: 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stokes-Brown, Atiya Kai. 2006. Racial Identity and Latino Vote Choice. American Politics Research 34: 627–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. ———. 2012. The Politics of Race in Latino Communities. Walking the Color Line. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Stoll, David. 1991. Is Latin America Turning Protestant? http://community.middlebury.edu/~dstoll/stoll.html. Accessed 10 May 2014.
  68. ———. 1993. Introduction: Rethinking Protestantism in Latin America. In Rethinking Protestantism in Latin America, eds. Virginia Garrard-Burnett and David Stoll. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Tajfel, Henri. 1970. Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination. Scientific American 223: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. ———. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Tajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner. 1979. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds. William G. Austin and Stephen Worchel, 94–109. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
  72. Taylor, Paul, Mark Hugo Lopez, Jessica Martínez, and Gabriel Velasco. 2012. When Labels Don’t Fit: Hispanics and Their Views of Identity. Pew Research Center: Hispanic Trends. April 4, 2012. http://www.pewhispanic.org/2012/04/04/when-labels-dont-fit-hispanics-and-their-views-of-identity. Accessed 21 Apr 2015.
  73. Tellez, Edward E., and Vilma Ortiz. 2008. Generations of Exclusion, Mexican Americans, Assimilation, and Race. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  74. van Zomeren, Martijn, Colin Wayne Leach, and Russell Spears. 2010. Does Group Efficacy Increase Group Identification? Resolving Their Paradoxical Relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 1055–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wenzel, Michael, Amélie Mummendey, and Steve Waldzus. 2007. Superordinate Identities and Intergroup Conflict: The Ingroup Projection Model. European Review of Social Psychology 18(1): 331–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angel Saavedra Cisneros
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyEdinburgUSA

Personalised recommendations