Advertisement

The Paradoxical Art of Designing for Emergence

  • Stephen Mark CollisEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the role of digital technologies in collaborative open space learning programs developed at Northern Beaches Christian School in Sydney, Australia. The chapter begins by recounting the role of an in-house innovation incubator called Sydney Centre for Innovation in Learning in nurturing a school philosophy that values emergent interactivity, and offers justification for this philosophy using Self-Determination Theory. It describes a number of ensuing open space learning designs, making specific reference to the practical use of digital technologies. The chapter concludes by proposing ecological design language that interprets structures in physical, virtual, and cultural space by their ability to facilitate emergent, unscripted interactions between people, their environment, and information. It emphasizes the paradoxical importance of linearity, constraint, and expert teaching in learning designs that set the scene for emergence to occur.

Keywords

Flexible learning environments Emergence Self-determination theory Moodle Learning design Learning space design Flipped learning 

Supplementary material

Video 1

Students in Years 5, 6 and 7 review their experiences of two choice-based learning programs employing a Bloom's/Gardner's Matrix. The video was recorded in 2008. (MP4 8685 kb)

Video 2

In sequence, this timelapse video shows a co-taught Year 7 Visual Arts course, our "Zone" program where all 180 of our Year 5 and 6 students work together in a shared space with 6 teachers, our "Rhythm and Blues" High School Music course, Year 8 French, and finishing with further footage from the Zone. All scenes are typical and representative of the courses portrayed as they typically run. (MP4 29,306 kb)

References

  1. Blair, A. (2003). Reading strategies for coping with information overload ca. 550–1700. Journal of the History of Ideas, 64(1), 11. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/.Google Scholar
  2. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Douch, A. (2012). The best school I’ve seen yet. Douchy’s Blog, Retrieved September 30, 2015, from http://andrewdouch.wordpress.com/2012/12/01/the-best-school-ive-seen-yet/.
  5. Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2013). The analysis of complex learning environments. In Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 49–63). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014a). Framing the analysis of learning network architectures. In The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 48–70). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Goodyear, P., & Carvalho, L. (2014b). The architecture of productive learning networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, S. (2005). Online learning in senior secondary school education: Practice, pedagogy & possibilities. Retrieved from http://scil.com.au/about/research/.
  10. Harris, S. (2006). Common factors influencing success in the online environment, June 2006. Retrieved from http://scil.com.au/about/research/.
  11. Harris, S. (2008). ICT innovation transforming the heart of the classroom. Retrieved from http://scil.com.au/about/research/.
  12. Harris, S. (2010). The SCIL story: Embedding research and innovation into everyday school practice. Retrieved from http://scil.com.au/about/research/.
  13. Harris, S. (2010). The place of virtual, pedagogic and physical space in the 21st century classroom. Retrieved from http://scil.com.au/about/research/.
  14. Ingold, T. (2010). Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials, Realities. ERSC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  15. Linfoot, C. (2006). Online courses for traditional schools and distance education students: A natural convergence and opportunity – One school’s journey. Retrieved from http://scil.com.au/about/research/.
  16. Linfoot, C. (2007). Open all hours – Virtual classrooms that effectively impact learning in and beyond the Physical Classroom. Retrieved from http://scil.com.au/about/research/.
  17. Plato. Phaedrus. trans. Jowett, B. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/phaedrus.html.
  18. Price, D. (2013). Open: How we’ll work, live and learn in the future (p. 168). London: Crux Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Rao, S. (2009). A cross categorical approach to service delivery: Promoting Successful inclusion through teacher education. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 5(1), 25–43.Google Scholar
  20. Thornburg, D. (2007). Campfires in cyberspace: Primordial metaphors for learning in the 21st century. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://tcpd.org/Thornburg/Handouts/Campfires.pdf.
  21. Yeoman, P. J. (2015). Habits and habitats: An ethnography of learning entanglement. Doctoral Thesis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sydney Centre for Innovation in LearningNorthern Beaches Christian SchoolTerrey HillsAustralia

Personalised recommendations