Cross-Linkage Between Mapillary Street Level Photos and OSM Edits

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Mapillary is a VGI platform which allows users to contribute crowdsourced street level photographs from all over the world. Due to unique information that can be extracted from street level photographs but not from aerial or satellite imagery, such as the content of road signs, users of other VGI Web 2.0 applications start to utilize Mapillary for collecting and editing data. This study assesses to which extent OpenStreetMap (OSM) feature edits use Mapillary data, based on tag information of added or edited features and changesets. It analyzes how spatial contribution patterns of individual users vary between OSM and Mapillary. A better understanding of cross-linkage patterns between different VGI platforms is important for data quality assessment, since cross-linkage can lead to better quality control of involved data sources.

Keywords

Volunteered geographic information Mapillary Openstreetmap User contributions Cross-linkage 

References

  1. Antoniou V, Morley J, Haklay M (2010) Web 2.0 geotagged photos: assessing the spatial dimension of the phenomenon. Geomatica 64(1):99–110Google Scholar
  2. Budhathoki NR, Haythornthwaite C (2013) Motivation for open collaboration crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. Am Behav Sci 57(5):548–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman DJ, Georgiadou Y, Labonte J (2009) Volunteered geographic information: the nature and motivation of produsers. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 4(1):332–358Google Scholar
  4. Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of web 2.0 (Editorial). Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res (IJSDIR) 2:24–32Google Scholar
  5. Haklay M (2010) How good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environ Plan 37(4):682–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hochmair HH, Zielstra D (2015) Analysing user contribution patterns of drone pictures to the dronestagram photo sharing portal. J Spat Sci 60(1):79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hollenstein L, Purves R (2010) Exploring place through user-generated content: using Flickr tags to describe city cores. J Spat Inf Sci 1:21–48Google Scholar
  8. Juhász L, Hochmair HH (2016) User contribution patterns and completeness evaluation of Mapillary, a crowdsourced street level photo service. Trans GIS. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tgis.12190/full
  9. Li L, Goodchild MF, Xu B (2013) Spatial, temporal, and socioeconomic patterns in the use of Twitter and Flickr. Cartography and Geogr Inf Sci 40(2):61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu J, Ram S (2011) Who does what: collaboration patterns in the wikipedia and their impact on article quality. ACM Manage Inf Syst (TMIS) 2(2):11Google Scholar
  11. Mooney P, Corcoran P (2012). How social is OpenStreetMap. In: Proceedings of the 15th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science. Avignon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  12. Mooney P, Corcoran P (2014) Analysis of interaction and co-editing patterns amongst OpenStreetMap contributors. Trans GIS 18(5):633–659Google Scholar
  13. Mooney P, Rehrl K, Hochmair HH (2013) Action and interaction in volunteered geographic information: a workshop review. J Location Based Serv 7(4):291–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neis P, Zielstra D (2014) Recent developments and future trends in volunteered geographic information research: the case of OpenStreetMap. Future Internet 6(1):76–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neis P, Zielstra D, Zipf A (2013) Comparison of volunteered geographic information data contributions and community development for selected world regions. Future Internet 5(2):282–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peters I, Stock WG (2010) Power tags in information retrieval. Libr Hi Tech 28(1):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Restivo M, van de Rijt A (2014) No praise without effort: experimental evidence on how rewards affect Wikipedia’s contributor community. Inf, Commun and Soc 17(4):451–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stephens M, Poorthuis A (2015). Follow thy neighbor: connecting the social and the spatial networks on Twitter. Comput, Environ Urban Syst 53:87–95Google Scholar
  19. Takhteyev Y, Gruzd A, Wellman B (2012) Geography of Twitter networks. Soc Netw 34(1):73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vandecasteele A, Devillers R (2015) Improving volunteered geographic information quality using a tag recommender system: the case of OpenStreetMap. In: Arjansani JJ, Zipf A, Mooney P, Helbich M (eds) OpenStreetMap in GIScience (Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography). Springer, Berlin, pp 59–80Google Scholar
  21. Zielstra D, Hochmair HH, Neis P (2013) Assessing the effect of data imports on the completeness of OpenStreetMap—a United States case study. Trans GIS 17(3):315–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geomatics ProgramUniversity of FloridaFort LauderdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations