Advertisement

ORBIT: Wireless Experimentation

  • Dipankar Raychaudhuri
  • Ivan Seskar
  • Max Ott
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of the ORBIT testbed for wireless experimentation. ORBIT is an NSF supported community testbed for wireless networking which provides a variety of programmable resources for at-scale reproducible experimentation as well as real-world outdoor trials. The centerpiece of the ORBIT testbed is the 400-node “radio grid” deployed at the Rutgers Tech Centre facility in North Brunswick, NJ. The radio grid enables researchers to conduct reproducible experiments with large numbers of wireless nodes over a wide range of radio technologies, densities and network topologies. The ORBIT system architecture is outlined and technical details are given for the radio grid’s key hardware and software components including the radio node platforms, software defined radios, RF measurement system, switching and computing backend and the ORBIT management framework (OMF). Additional ORBIT resources including special purpose sandboxes and the outdoor WiMax campus deployment are also described. The experimental interface and scripting tools for running an experiment on ORBIT are outlined, and examples of a few representative experiments which have been run on the ORBIT testbed are summarized. The chapter concludes with a view of ORBIT’s evolution and future upgrade path along with an explanation of how it links to the overall GENI project.

Keywords

Medium Access Control Medium Access Control Layer Radio Node Good Effort Dynamic Spectrum Access 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    OPNET simulator. http://www.opnet.com/
  3. 3.
    Parulkar, G.: private communication, 2005Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Ertin, E., Arora, A., Ramnath, R., Nesterenko, M., Naik, V., Bapat, S., Kulathumani, V., Sridharan, M., Zhang, H., Cao, H., Kansei: a testbed for sensing at scale. In: Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN/SPOTS track) (2006).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    DETER Testbed. http://www.isi.edu/deter
  10. 10.
    Wisconsin Advanced Internet Laboratory. http://wail.cs.wisc.edu/
  11. 11.
    MIT sensor network testbed. http://mistlab.csail.mit.edu/
  12. 12.
    PlanetLab project. http://www.planet-lab.org/
  13. 13.
    Emulab project. http://www.emulab.net/
  14. 14.
    ORBIT Testbed. http://www.orbit-lab.org
  15. 15.
    Raychaudhuri, D.: ORBIT: Open-Access Research Testbed for Next-Generation Wireless Networks, proposal submitted to NSF Network Research Testbeds Program, NSF award # ANI-0335244, 2003-07, May 2003.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raychaudhuri, D., Seskar, I., Ott, M., Ganu, S., Ramachandran, K., Kremo, H., Siracusa, R., Liu, H., Singh, M.: Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (2005).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ott, M., Seskar, I., Siracusa, R., Singh, M.: ORBIT testbed software architecture: supporting experiments as a service. In: Proceedings of IEEE Tridentcom 2005, Trento, Italy, February 2005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh, M., Ott, M., Seskar, I., Kamat, P.: ORBIT measurements framework and library (OML): motivations, design, implementation, and features. In: Proceedings of IEEE Tridentcom 2005, Trento, Italy, February 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peterson, L.: GENI: Global environment for network investigations. ACM SIGCOMM '05, August 2005.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    AODV—Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing. http://moment.cs.ucsb.edu/AODV/
  21. 21.
    DSR—Dynamic Source Routing Protocol. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dmaltz/dsr.html
  22. 22.
    Bluetooth special interest group. https://www.bluetooth.org/
  23. 23.
    Zigbee alliance. http://www.zigbee.org/
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Lei, J., Yates, R., Greenstein, L., Liu, H.: Wireless link SNR mapping onto an indoor testbed. In: Proceedings of IEEE Tridentcom 2005, Trento, Italy, February 2005.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lei, J., Yates, R., Greenstein, L., Liu, H.: Mapping link SNRs of wireless mesh networks onto an indoor testbed. In: Proceedings of IEEE Tridentcom 2006, Barcelona, Spain, March 1–3, 2006Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP). http://www.ettus.com/downloads/usrp_1.pdf
  28. 28.
    Kaul, S., Gruteser, M., Seskar, I.: Creating wireless multi-hop topologies on space-constrained indoor testbeds through noise injection. In: IEEE Tridentcom, March 2006.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Raychaudhuri, D.: Proof-of-concept Prototyping of Methods for Wireless Virtualization and Wired-Wireless Testbed Integration. supplement to NSF Award ANI-0335244, June 2006.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    IEEE 802.16 Working Group. IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems. IEEE Std 802 (2004).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    LTE Base Station Software. http://bellard.org/lte/
  32. 32.
    Off-The-Shelf 4G Network. http://www.amarisoft.com/
  33. 33.
    Hibler, M., Stoller, L., Lepreau, J., Ricci, R., Barb, C.: Fast scalable disk imaging with Frisbee. In: Proceedings of the 2003 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, June 2003.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    LibMac—A user-level C library. https://www.orbit-lab.org/browser/libmac/trunk
  35. 35.
    Ramachandran, K., Kaul, S., Mathur, S., Gruteser, M., Seskar, I.: Towards large-scale mobility emulation through spatial switching on a wireless grid. In: E-WIND Workshop (held with ACM SIGCOMM) (2005).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ganu, S., Seskar, I., Ott, M., Raychaudhuri, D., Paul, S.: Architecture and framework for supporting open-access multi-user wireless experimentation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Communication System Software and Middleware (COMSWARE 2006), Delhi, India, January 2006.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li, Z., Xu, W., Miller, R., Trappe, W.: Securing wireless systems via lower layer enforcements. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Workshop on Wireless Security (WiSe) (2006).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    In the Matter of Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands: Third Memorandum Opinion and Order, April 2012. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.pdf
  39. 39.
    Extending LTE Advanced to Unlicensed Spectrum-White Paper, Qualcomm Inc., December 2013. https://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/white-paper-extending-lte-advanced-to-unlicensed-spectrum.pdf
  40. 40.
    Jing, X., Raychaudhuri, D.: Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol. In: Proceedings of IEEE DySPAN’05, Baltimore, MD, November 8–11, 2005.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Paul, S., Yates, R., Raychaudhuri, D., Kurose, J.: The cache-and-forward network architecture for efficient mobile content delivery services in the future internet. In: Proceedings of IEEE Innovations in NGN: Future Network and Services (2008).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nelson, S., Bhanage, G., Raychaudhuri, D.: GSTAR: Generalized storage-aware routing for mobilityfirst in the future mobile internet. In: Proceedings of ACM MobiArch 2011.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    MobilityFirst Future Internet Architecture Project. http://mobilityfirst.winlab.rutgers.edu/
  44. 44.
    Vu, T., Baid, A., Zhang, Y., Nguyen, T., Fukuyama, J., Martin, R., Raychaudhuri, D.: DMap: a shared hosting scheme for dynamic identifier to locator mappings in the global internet. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2012).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sharma, A., Tie, X., Uppal, H., Venkataramani, A., Westbrook, D., Yadav, A.: A global name service for a highly mobile internetwork. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (2014)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Siganos, G., Tauro, S., Faloutsos, M.: Jellyfish: a conceptual model for the AS Internet topology. J. Netw. Commun. 8(3), 339–350 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shavitt, Y., Shir, E.: DIMES—Letting the Internet Measure Itself. http://www.netdimes.org/
  48. 48.
    CAIDA: The Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis. http://www.caida.org/
  49. 49.
    Venkatesan, S., Lozano, A., Valenzuela, R.: Network MIMO: overcoming interference in indoor wireless systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (2007)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Raychaudhuri D., Gerla M.: New Architectures and Disruptive Technologies for the Future Internet: The Wireless, Mobile and Sensor Network Perspective, Report of NSF Wireless Mobile Planning Group (WMPG) Workshop, August 2005 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WINLAB, Department of ECERutgers UniversityNorth BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.NICTASydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations