Modeling and Formal Analysis of a Client-Server Application for Cloud Services

  • Paolo Arcaini
  • Roxana-Maria Holom
  • Elvinia Riccobene
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9421)

Abstract

In the context of Cloud computing, a service can be invoked by distinct devices having different HW/SW characteristics; therefore, the content must be adapted to each device profile. A solution consists in having a middleware server that receives requests from the clients, forwards them to the cloud, and adapts the answers coming from the cloud on the base of device profiles. This paper proposes a formalization of this framework using Abstract State Machines (ASMs). The modeling process is based on the ASMs refinement method, and has been guided and supported by several validation and verification activities to guarantee consistency, correctness, and reliability properties.

References

  1. 1.
    Alalfi, M.H., Cordy, J.R., Dean, T.R.: Modelling methods for web application verification and testing: state of the art. Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab. 19(4), 265–296 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arcaini, P., Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E.: AsmetaSMV: a way to link high-level ASM models to low-level NuSMV specifications. In: Frappier, M., Glässer, U., Khurshid, S., Laleau, R., Reeves, S. (eds.) ABZ 2010. LNCS, vol. 5977, pp. 61–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arcaini, P., Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E.: Automatic review of abstract state machines by meta property verification. In: Muñoz, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the Second NASA Formal Methods Symposium (NFM), pp. 4–13. NASA (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arcaini, P., Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P.: A model-driven process for engineering a toolset for a formal method. Softw. Pract. Experience 41, 155–166 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ardagna, D., Di Nitto, E., Mohagheghi, P., Mosser, S., Ballagny, C., D’Andria, F., Casale, G., Matthews, P., Nechifor, C.-S., Petcu, D., Gericke, A., Sheridan, C.: Modaclouds: a model-driven approach for the design and execution of applications on multiple clouds. In: 2012 ICSE Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering (MISE), pp. 50–56, June 2012Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ballis, D., Garca-Viv, J.: A rule-based system for web site verification. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 157(2), 11–17 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Börger, E., Stärk, R.: Abstract State Machines: A Method for High-Level System Design and Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carioni, A., Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P.: A scenario-based validation language for ASMs. In: Börger, E., Butler, M., Bowen, J.P., Boca, P. (eds.) ABZ 2008. LNCS, vol. 5238, pp. 71–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chelemen, R.-M.: Modeling a web application for cloud content adaptation with ASMs. In: 2013 International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data (CloudCom-Asia), pp. 44–51, December 2013Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P.: A metamodel-based language and a simulation engine for abstract state machines. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 14(12), 1949–1983 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gervasi, R.-M., Börger, E., Cisternino, A.: Modeling web applications infrastructure with ASMs. Sci. Comput. Programm. 94, 69–92 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haydar, M., Petrenko, A., Boroday, S., Sahraoui, H.: A formal approach for run-time verification of web applications using scope-extended LTL. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(12), 2191–2208 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heitmeyer, C.L.: On the need for practical formal methods. In: Ravn, A.P., Rischel, H. (eds.) FTRTFT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1486, pp. 18–26. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Homma, K., Izumi, S., Abe, Y., Takahashi, K., Togashi., A: Using the model checker spin for web application design. In: 2010 10th IEEE/IPSJ International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT), pp. 137–140, July 2010Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mao-shan, S., Yi-hai, C., Sheng-bo, C., Mei-Jia: A model checking approach to web application navigation model with session mechanism. In: 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM), vol. 5, pp. V5–398–V5–403, October 2010Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Offutt, J., Wu, Y.: Modeling presentation layers of web applications for testing. Softw. Syst. Model. 9(2), 257–280 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schewe, K.-D., Bósa, K., Lampesberger, H., Ma, H., Vleju, M.B.: The Christian Doppler laboratory for client-centric cloud computing. In: 2nd Workshop on Software Services (WoSS 2011), Timisoara, Romania, June 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Arcaini
    • 1
  • Roxana-Maria Holom
    • 2
  • Elvinia Riccobene
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento di IngegneriaUniversità degli Studi di BergamoBergamoItaly
  2. 2.Christian-Doppler Laboratory for Client-Centric Cloud Computing HagenbergJohannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria
  3. 3.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations