Many Have It Wrong – Samples Do Contain Personal Data: The Data Protection Regulation as a Superior Framework to Protect Donor Interests in Biobanking and Genomic Research
Genomic research relies on the availability of genomic data. Detached biological samples, stored in facilities known as biobanks, are the source of this data. Donors have interests in these samples. In particular, donors have interests in samples by virtue of the personal data they contain. In relation to this observation, this article puts forward three arguments. First: The current European legislative framework relating to samples is inadequate. This inadequacy results from not understanding samples in terms of the information they contain. Second: European data protection law, in particular as outlined in the forthcoming Data Protection Regulation, might be looked as a source of solutions. However, whether data protection law can apply to samples at all remains a subject of debate. One key argument supports the position that it cannot: Samples are not data, but rather are physical mater, and therefore can only a source of data. Third: The assertion that ‘samples are not data, but rather only physical matter’ is flawed. Samples do contain data – DNA is data. DNA is understood as information both popularly and in the genetic sciences. In fact, even in informatics, DNA can be understood as data.
- Anthony, Sebastian. 2012. Harvard cracks DNA storage, crams 700 terabytes of data into a single gram. Extremetech, August 17. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/134672-harvard-cracks-dna-storage-crams-700-terabytes-of-data-into-a-single-gram. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. 2007. Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data. WP136.Google Scholar
- Australian Law Reform Commission and Australian Health Ethics Committee. 2003. Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia. http://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/ALRC96_vol2.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Beyleveld, Deryck. 2004. An overview of directive 95/46/EC in relation to medical research. In The data protection directive and medical research across Europe, ed. Deryck Beyleveld et al., 8–21. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Beyleveld, Deryck, Andrew Grubb, David Townend, Ryan Morgan, and Jessica Wright. 2004. The UK’s implementation of directive 95/46/EC. In Implementation of the data protection directive in relation to medical research in Europe, ed. Deryck Beyleveld et al., 403–428. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Church, George, Yuan Gao and Sriram Kosuri. 2012. Next generation digital information storage in DNA. Science Express. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.299.5153&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Clinton, William. 2000. Remarks made by the president…on the completion of the first survey of the entire human genome project. The White House Office of the Press Secretary. June 26. https://www.genome.gov/10001356. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Estonian Parliament. 2000. Human Genes Research Act. English translation available at: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/531102013003/consolide. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- European Commission. 1992. Amended proposal for a Council Directive on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. COM (92) 422 final. http://aei.pitt.edu/10375/1/10375.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- European Commission. 2010. A comprehensive approach on personal data protection in the European Union, COM (2010) 609 final. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consulting_public/0006/com_2010_609_en.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- European Commission. 2012. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). COM (2012) 11 final. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/document/review2012/com_2012_11_en.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- European Court of Human Rights. 2008. S. and Marper v United Kingdom, no. 30562/04 and 30566/04.Google Scholar
- European Parliament and European Council. 1995. On the Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Directive 95/46/EC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31995L0046&from=EN. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Government of Australia. 2005. Australian Law Reform Commission and Australian Health Ethics Committee Report essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia: Government response to recommendations. http://apo.org.au/files/Resource/3newfinalresponse6december2005.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Gibbons, Susan. 2012. Mapping the regulatory space. In Governing biobanks: Understanding the interplay between law and practice, ed. Jane Kaye et al., 51–92. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
- Gutwirth, Serge, and Paul De Hert. 2006. Privacy, data protection and law enforcement. Opacity of the individual and transparency of power. In Privacy and the criminal law, ed. E. Claes, A. Duff, and S. Gutwirth, 61–104. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
- Hartl, Daniel, and Maryellen Ruvolo. 2012. Genetics: Analysis of genes and genomes, 8th ed. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett Publishing.Google Scholar
- Human Tissue Authority. 2014a. List of materials considered to be ‘relevant material’ under the Human Tissue Act 2004. https://www.hta.gov.uk/policies/list-materials-considered-be-%E2%80%98relevant-material%E2%80%99-under-human-tissue-act-2004. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Human Tissue Authority. 2014b. Code of practise 9: Research. https://www.hta.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Code_of_practice_9_-_Research.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Illumina. 2015. HiSeq X ten specification sheet. http://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/datasheets/datasheet-hiseq-x-ten.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- International Standards Organisation. 1993. Information technology—Vocabulary—Part 1: Fundamental terms. ISO 2382–1. Revised by ISO/IEC 2382–1, 2015. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=63598. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Kaye, Jane. 2012. Embedding biobanks in a changing context. In Governing biobanks: Understanding the interplay between Law and practice, ed. Kaye Jane et al., 30–51. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
- National Health and Medical Research Council. 2010. Biobanks information paper. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e110_biobanks_information_paper_140520.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Nys, Herman. 2004. Report on the implementation of directive 95/46/EC in Belgian law. In Implementation of the data protection directive in relation to medical research in Europe, ed. Deryck Beyleveld et al., 29–41. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2007. The forensic use of bioinformation: ethical issues. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/The-forensic-use-of-bioinformation-ethical-issues.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Sweeny, Latanya, Akua Abu and Julia Winn. 2013. Identifying participants in the personal genome project by name. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2257732. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- UK Parliament. 2004a. Human Tissue Act 2004. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/pdfs/ukpga_20040030_en.pdf. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- UK Parliament. 2004b. Human Tissue Act 2004 Explanatory Note. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/notes. Last consulted 20.06. Accessed 03 July 2015.
- Willimas, George. 1992. Natural selection: Domains, levels and challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar