Privatisation and Changing Farm Structure in the Commonwealth of Independent States

  • Zvi LermanEmail author


The most striking feature of land reform in the post-Soviet space has been the overall shift from collective to individual land tenure in agriculture, generally accompanied by privatisation of legal landownership. Individualisation of farming has been among the main factors that acted to arrest the initial decline in production during the transition and to bring about agricultural recovery in the region. In Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries, the recovery point for agricultural growth is closely linked with the observed watershed dates for individualisation of farming. Furthermore, the rate and the attained level of recovery are higher in countries that pursued decisive individualisation policies (Transcaucasus, Central Asia), while in countries with less sweeping individualisation reforms (European CIS) the recovery has been sluggish. Land reform and individualisation have also led to significant improvements in agricultural productivity due to the higher incentives in family farming. Greater production and higher productivity have contributed to significant poverty reduction since 2000. To ensure continued improvement of rural family incomes and poverty mitigation, policy measures should be implemented that facilitate enlargement of very small family farms and encourage the access of small farms to market channels and services.


Small Farm Individual Farm Land Reform Peasant Farm Collective Farm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alam, A., Murthi, M., Yemtsov, R., Murrugarra, E., Dudwick, N., Hamilton, E., & Tiongson, E. (2005). Growth, poverty, and inequality: Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deininger, K. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. Washington, DC: World Bank Research Report, World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Dudwick, N., Fock, K., & Sedik, D. (2007). Land reform and farm restructuring in transition countries: The experience of Bulgaria, Moldova, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, World Bank Working Paper No 104. Washington, DC: World Bank. Scholar
  4. FAO. (2010). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests, first draft. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN.Google Scholar
  5. Lerman, Z. (2008). Agricultural development in Central Asia: A survey of Uzbekistan, 2007–2008. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 49, 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lerman, Z. (2010). Agricultural recovery and individual land tenure: Evidence from Central Asia. In I. Ferto, C. Forgacs, & A. Jambor (Eds.), Changing landscape of European agriculture: Essays in honour of Professor Csaba Csaki. Agroinform: Budapest.Google Scholar
  7. Lerman, Z., & Cimpoies, D. (2006). Land consolidation as a factor for rural development in Moldova. Europe–Asia Studies, 58, 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lerman, Z., & Schreinemachers, P. (2005). Individual farming as a labor sink: Evidence from Poland and Russia. Comparative Economic Studies, 47, 675–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2008). The economic effects of land reform in Tajikistan, FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Policy Studies on Rural Transition No 2008–1. Budapest: FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia.
  10. Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2009). Agricultural recovery and individual land tenure: Lessons from Central Asia, FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Policy Studies on Rural Transition No 2009–3. Budapest: FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia.
  11. Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2010). Rural transition in Azerbaijan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  12. Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2013). Russian agriculture in transition. In M. Alexeev & S. Weber (Eds.), Handbook of Russian economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2014). Cooperatives in Eurasia, Policy Studies on Rural Transition No 2014–3. Budapest: FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia.Google Scholar
  14. Lerman, Z., Csaki, C., & Feder, G. (2004). Agriculture in transition: Land policies and evolving farm structures in post-Soviet countries. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  15. Lerman, Z., Sedik, D., Pugachov, N., & Goncharuk, A. (2007). Rethinking agricultural reform in Ukraine (Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Eastern and Central Europe, Vol. 38). Halle, Germany: IAMO.Google Scholar
  16. Moldova. (2011). Impact assessment of the land re-parceling pilot project in 6 villages: Final report. Chisinau: AGREX.Google Scholar
  17. Republic of Tajikistan. (2009). Resolution No 406 of the government of the Republic of Tajikistan on implementation of additional measures to support agriculture in the Republic of Tajikistan as per Presidential decree No 663, Dushanbe, 2 July 2009. Action plan annex, items 2 and 4.Google Scholar
  18. Republic of Kazakhstan. (2003). Land code of the Republic of Kazakhstan 20 June 2003 (as amended 24 November 2011) [in Russian].
  19. Rosreestr. (2006). The land fund of the Russian Federation as of 1 January 2006. Moscow: Rosreestr [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. Rosreestr. (2011). The land fund of the Russian Federation as of 1 January 2011. Moscow: Rosreestr [in Russian].Google Scholar
  21. Rosreestr. (2013). The land fund of the Russian Federation as of 1 January 2013. Moscow: Rosreestr [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. Shagaida, N., & Lerman, Z. (2008). Land reform and development of land markets. In Z. Lerman (Ed.), Russia’s agriculture in transition. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Chapter 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and EnvironmentThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations