Privatisation and Changing Farm Structure in the Commonwealth of Independent States
The most striking feature of land reform in the post-Soviet space has been the overall shift from collective to individual land tenure in agriculture, generally accompanied by privatisation of legal landownership. Individualisation of farming has been among the main factors that acted to arrest the initial decline in production during the transition and to bring about agricultural recovery in the region. In Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries, the recovery point for agricultural growth is closely linked with the observed watershed dates for individualisation of farming. Furthermore, the rate and the attained level of recovery are higher in countries that pursued decisive individualisation policies (Transcaucasus, Central Asia), while in countries with less sweeping individualisation reforms (European CIS) the recovery has been sluggish. Land reform and individualisation have also led to significant improvements in agricultural productivity due to the higher incentives in family farming. Greater production and higher productivity have contributed to significant poverty reduction since 2000. To ensure continued improvement of rural family incomes and poverty mitigation, policy measures should be implemented that facilitate enlargement of very small family farms and encourage the access of small farms to market channels and services.
KeywordsSmall Farm Individual Farm Land Reform Peasant Farm Collective Farm
- Deininger, K. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. Washington, DC: World Bank Research Report, World Bank.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2010). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests, first draft. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN.Google Scholar
- Lerman, Z. (2010). Agricultural recovery and individual land tenure: Evidence from Central Asia. In I. Ferto, C. Forgacs, & A. Jambor (Eds.), Changing landscape of European agriculture: Essays in honour of Professor Csaba Csaki. Agroinform: Budapest.Google Scholar
- Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2008). The economic effects of land reform in Tajikistan, FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Policy Studies on Rural Transition No 2008–1. Budapest: FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia. http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/aq331e/aq331e.pdf.
- Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2009). Agricultural recovery and individual land tenure: Lessons from Central Asia, FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Policy Studies on Rural Transition No 2009–3. Budapest: FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia. http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/aq335e/aq335e.pdf.
- Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2010). Rural transition in Azerbaijan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2013). Russian agriculture in transition. In M. Alexeev & S. Weber (Eds.), Handbook of Russian economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lerman, Z., & Sedik, D. (2014). Cooperatives in Eurasia, Policy Studies on Rural Transition No 2014–3. Budapest: FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia.Google Scholar
- Lerman, Z., Csaki, C., & Feder, G. (2004). Agriculture in transition: Land policies and evolving farm structures in post-Soviet countries. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Lerman, Z., Sedik, D., Pugachov, N., & Goncharuk, A. (2007). Rethinking agricultural reform in Ukraine (Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Eastern and Central Europe, Vol. 38). Halle, Germany: IAMO.Google Scholar
- Moldova. (2011). Impact assessment of the land re-parceling pilot project in 6 villages: Final report. Chisinau: AGREX.Google Scholar
- Republic of Tajikistan. (2009). Resolution No 406 of the government of the Republic of Tajikistan on implementation of additional measures to support agriculture in the Republic of Tajikistan as per Presidential decree No 663, Dushanbe, 2 July 2009. Action plan annex, items 2 and 4.Google Scholar
- Republic of Kazakhstan. (2003). Land code of the Republic of Kazakhstan 20 June 2003 (as amended 24 November 2011) [in Russian]. http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1040583
- Rosreestr. (2006). The land fund of the Russian Federation as of 1 January 2006. Moscow: Rosreestr [in Russian].Google Scholar
- Rosreestr. (2011). The land fund of the Russian Federation as of 1 January 2011. Moscow: Rosreestr [in Russian].Google Scholar
- Rosreestr. (2013). The land fund of the Russian Federation as of 1 January 2013. Moscow: Rosreestr [in Russian].Google Scholar
- Shagaida, N., & Lerman, Z. (2008). Land reform and development of land markets. In Z. Lerman (Ed.), Russia’s agriculture in transition. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Chapter 5.Google Scholar