Advertisement

Simulation Data Management and Reuse: Toward a Verification and Validation Approach

  • Anaïs Ottino
  • Thomas Vosgien
  • Julien Le Duigou
  • Nicolas Figay
  • Pascal Lardeur
  • Benoît Eynard
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 467)

Abstract

Nowadays, in various sectors of industry, numerical simulation process becomes more and more time consuming. In this process, the lead time of the pre-processing stage is predominant. Therefore, in order to optimize this process and hence, the design process, the created computational models need to be reused. According to Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) approach in an extended enterprise context, the computational models come from various partners, departments and heterogeneous tools. In order to reuse these computational models, it is necessary to capitalize the simulation data in accordance with a common standardized and structured format. Based on a Simulation Lifecycle Management (SLM) approach and a Verification & Validation methodology, this paper proposes a framework and a process to enable the reuse of computational models.

Keywords

Numerical simulation STEP AP209 Simulation Lifecycle Management Verification & Validation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research work has been carried out under the leadership of the Technological Research Institute SystemX, and therefore granted with public funds within the scope of the French Program “Investissements d’Avenir”.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Nguyen, T., Ferru, F., Guellec, P., Yannou, B.: Engineering data management for extended enterprise - context of the European VIVACE project. In: PLM-SP2, pp. 338–348 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Le Duigou, J., Bernard, A., Perry, N., Delplace, J.C.: Generic PLM system for SMEs: application to an equipment manufacturer. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manage. 6(1), 51–64 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Figay, N., Tchoffa, D., Ghodous, P., Exposito, E., El Mhamedi, A.: Dynamic manufacturing network, PLM hub and business standards testbed. In: Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol. 7, pp. 453–463. Albi, France, 24–28 March 2014Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    CIMdata, Simulation Lifecycle Management - more than data management for simulation, Michigan (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ElMaraghy, H.A.: Changing and evolving products and systems – models and enablers. In: ElMaraghy, H.A. (ed.) Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, pp. 25–45. Springer, London (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lalor, P.: Simulation Lifecycle Management - opens a new window on the future of product design and manufacturing (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mocko, G.M., Fenves, S.J.: A survey of design – analysis integration issues. In: NISTIR 6996 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Figay, N., Ghodous, P., Khalfallah, M., Barhamgi, M.: Interoperability framework for dynamic manufacturing networks. Comput. Ind. 63(8), 749–755 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Charles, S., Ducellier, G., Li, L., Eynard, B.: Improvement of 3D data exchanges in the product lifecycle management. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, pp. 507–516. Lyon, France, 11–13 July 2005Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen Van, T., Maille, B., Yannou, B.: Digital mock-up – capabilities and implementation in the PLM field. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, pp. 165–175. Bangalore, India, 10–12 July 2006Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shephard, M.S., Beall, M.W., Bara, R.M.O., Webster, B.E.: Toward simulation-based design. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 40(12), 1575–1598 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delalondre, F., Smith, C., Shephard, M.S.: Collaborative software infrastructure for adaptive multiple model simulation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199(21–22), 1352–1370 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Assouroko, I., Boutinaud, P., Troussier, N., Eynard, B., Ducellier, G.: Survey on standards for product data exchange and sharing: application in CAD/CAE interoperability. Int. J. Des. Innov. Res. 5(1), 9–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balci, O.: Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the life cycle of a simulation study. In: Simulation Conference Proceedings, pp. 215–220. Orlando, USA, 11–14 December 1994Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sibois, R., Määttä, T., Siuko, M., Mattila, J.: Early design verification of ITER remote handling systems using digital mock-ups within simulation lifecycle environment. In: 25th Symposium on Fusion Engineering (SOFE), pp. 1–6. San Francisco, USA, 10–14 June 2013Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maropoulos, P.G., Ceglarek, D.: Design verification and validation in product lifecycle. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 59(2), 740–759 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thacker, B.H., Doebling, S.W., Hemez, F.M., Anderson, M.C., Pepin, J.E., Rodriguez, E.A.: Concepts of Model Verification and Validation (No. LA-14167). Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schlesinger, S.: Terminology for model credibility. Simulation 32(3), 103–104 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oberkampf, W.L., Trucano, T.G., Hirsch, C.: Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics. Appl. Mech. Rev. 57(5), 345–384 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scigliano, R., Scionti, M., Lardeur, P.: Verification, validation and variability for the vibration study of a car windscreen modeled by finite elements. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 47(1), 17–29 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roache, P.J.: Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa, Albuquerque (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    AIAA, R-101A - AIAA recommended practice for the CFD General Notation System - Standard interface data structures (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    ISO, ISO 10303-209 - Application protocol: multidisciplinary analysis and design (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Calvaire, A., de Koning, H.P., Huau, P.: STEP-TAS-177-AP - Application protocol: thermal analysis for space (1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pratt, M.J.: Introduction to ISO 10303 - the STEP standard for product data exchange. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 1(1), 102–103 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hunten, K.A.: Design and manufacture of composite material product. In: Interoperability for Digital Engineering Systems, FrancoAnge, pp. 61–66 (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ISO, ISO 10303-242 - Application protocol: managed model-based 3D engineering (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    SAE International, Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) 4754A (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    ASME, V V 10 - guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    IEEE SA, 1012 - IEEE standard for system and software verification and validation (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    ASME, V V 20 - Standard for verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ISO, ISO 10303-233 - Part 233: Application protocol: systems engineering (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    The Open Group, ArchiMate 2.0 specification. Van Haren Publishing (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anaïs Ottino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas Vosgien
    • 2
  • Julien Le Duigou
    • 1
  • Nicolas Figay
    • 2
  • Pascal Lardeur
    • 1
  • Benoît Eynard
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire RobervalUniversité de Technologie de Compiègne, Sorbonne UniversitésCompiègneFrance
  2. 2.Institut de Recherche Technologique SystemXUniversité Paris-SaclayPalaiseauFrance

Personalised recommendations