3D Capture Techniques for BIM Enabled LCM

  • Fodil Fadli
  • Hichem Barki
  • Ahmed Shaat
  • Lamine Mahdjoubi
  • Pawel Boguslawski
  • Vadim Zverovich
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 467)

Abstract

As a special kind of Product Life cyle Management (PLM), Building Life cycle Management (BLM) is a centric activity for facility owners and managers. This fact motivates the adoption of Building Information Modeling (BIM) approaches as a way to achieve smart BLM strategies for cost reduction, facility knowledge management, and project synchronization among the different stakeholders. Unfortunately, the current BIM state of the art is tailored towards the management of new projects, while ongoing and completed AEC projects could hugely benefit from BIM integration for better BLM strategies. In this regards, it is absolutely necessary to acquire knowledge about the dynamic facility aspects (crowd movement, as-is updates, etc.). Up-to-date, 3D capture appears to be the only reliable way to cope with such situation. In this paper, we analyze 3D capture techniques, ranging from photogrammetry to 3D scanning, with an emphasis on helping 3D capture practitioners to make critical decisions about the choice of adequate acquisition technologies for a particular application. We discuss 3D capture techniques by exposing their pros and cons, according to several relevant criteria, and synthesize our analysis by developing a set of recommendations to enhance the life expectancy of buildings via the integration of BIM into Life Cycle Management (LCM) of the built environment and its buildings.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research/publication was made possible by a National Priority Research Program NPRP award [NPRP-06-1208-2-492] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the author(s).

References

  1. 1.
    Laser scanning Europe. Rent a laser scanner at little cost. http://www.laserscanning-europe.com/en/rent-laser-scanner/rent-laser-scanner-little-cost
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    MicroScribe Portable Scanners. http://www.3d-microscribe.com/
  4. 4.
    Agnello, F., Brutto, M.L.: Integrated surveying techniques in cultural heritage documentation. In: ISPRS Archives, vol. 36, 5/W47 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-kheder, S., Al-shawabkeh, Y., Haala, N.: Developing a documentation system for desert palaces in Jordan using 3D laser scanning and digital photogrammetry. J. Archaeol. Sci. 36(2), 537–546 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baltsavias, E.P.: A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 54(2–3), 83–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barki, H., Fadli, F., Boguslawski, P., Mahdjoubi, L., Shaat, A.: BIM models generation from 2D CAD drawings and 3D scans: an analysis of challenges and opportunities for AEC practitioners. In: Proceddings of The International Conference on Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Constructions and Operations (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bell, S., Morse, S.: Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable?. Earthscan, London (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cracknell, A.P.: Introduction to Remote Sensing, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Debevec, P.E., Taylor, C.J., Malik, J.: Modeling and rendering architecture from photographs. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques - SIGGRAPH 1996, pp. 11–20 (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Omari, S., Moselhi, O.: Integrating 3D laser scanning and photogrammetry for progress measurement of construction work. Autom. Constr. 18(1), 1–9 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fadli, F., Barki, H., Boguslawski, P., Mahdjoubi, L.: 3D scene capture: a comprehensive review of techniques and tools for efficient Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Emergency Preparedness (EP) applications. In: Proceddings of the International Conference on Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Constructions and Operations (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fadli, F., Sibley, M.: Measuring sustainability levels of tourist resorts: STAM and the use of radar diagrams. In: The International Conference of the Center for the Study of Architecturein the Arab Region (CSAAR), pp. 1315–1331 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fadli, F., Sobhey, M., Asadi, R., Elsarrag, E.: Environmental impact assessment of new district developments. In: WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, pp. 517–528 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fowler, K., Rauch, E.: Sustainable Building Rating Systems Summary. Technical report Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report 15858 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jaselskis, E.J., Gao, Z., Walters, R.C.: Improving transportation projects using laser scanning. J. Constr. Engin. Manag. 131(3), 377–384 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang, R., Jáuregui, D.V., White, K.R.: Close-range photogrammetry applications in bridge measurement: Literature review. Measurement 41(8), 823–834 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Masson, B.T.: Paul Debevec and the Art of Photogrammetry. pp. 2–4 (2000). www.vfxpro.com
  19. 19.
    Pintér, L., Hardi, P., Martinuzzi, A., Hall, J.: Bellagio stamp: principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecol. Ind. 17, 20–28 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scopigno, R.: Tutorial T1 : 3D data acquisition. In: EUROGRAPHCS 2002 Tutorials (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tse, R.O.C., Gold, C., Kidner, D.: 3D city modelling from LIDAR data. In: van Oosterom, P., Zlatanova, S., Penninga, F., Fendel, E.M. (eds.) Advances in 3D Geoinformation Systems, pp. 161–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wells, M.: Gentle Architecture. McGraw-Hill, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xiao, Y., Zhan, Q., Pang, Q.: 3D data acquisition by terrestrial laser scanning for protection of historical buildings. In: 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, pp. 5966–5969 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yastikli, N.: Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. J. Cult. Herit. 8(4), 423–427 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zender, H., Martínez Mozos, O., Jensfelt, P., Kruijff, G.J., Burgard, W.: Conceptual spatial representations for indoor mobile robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 56(6), 493–502 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fodil Fadli
    • 1
  • Hichem Barki
    • 1
  • Ahmed Shaat
    • 2
  • Lamine Mahdjoubi
    • 3
  • Pawel Boguslawski
    • 3
  • Vadim Zverovich
    • 3
  1. 1.Department Of Architecture and Urban Planning, College of EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar
  2. 2.MZ & Partners Architectural and Engineering ConsultancyDohaQatar
  3. 3.Department of Architecture and the Built EnvironmentUniversity of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations