Coping with or Buffering Against the Negative Impact of Social Exclusion on Basic Needs: A Review of Strategies
In this chapter, we give an overview of research on strategies that help cope with or buffer against the negative psychological consequences of social exclusion. Coping strategies are utilized after the individual has shown reflexive responses to social exclusion (e.g., need threat, negative affect) and should facilitate psychological recovery. Specifically, coping strategies help prevent maladaptive reflective responses to social exclusion such as social withdrawal and aggression by restoring basic needs satisfaction and improving mood. As social withdrawal and aggression are more likely to occur in response to social exclusion when no affiliation opportunity is available or the prospect of social acceptance is low, we focus on coping strategies that can be utilized in such situations, namely reminders of social bonds, social surrogates, and turning to religion. In contrast to coping strategies, buffering strategies are utilized prior to or at the onset of an exclusionary episode and are intended to mitigate or prevent the reflexive responses to social exclusion. Until recently, research findings suggested that reflexive responses to social exclusion are resistant to change. In this chapter, however, we suggest and empirically substantiate the psychological resource hypothesis, according to which strategies that help build up strong psychological resources, such as belonging, self-esteem, control, and meaningfulness, may prove effective as buffers against the reflexive responses to social exclusion. The buffering strategies discussed in this chapter are social companionship during the exclusionary event, belonging to a majority, thinking about money, and visualizing oneself in a powerful position.
KeywordsSocial exclusion Buffering strategies Coping strategies Majority Money Power Psychological resources Reminders of social bonds Religion Social surrogates
- Aydin, N., Krueger, J., Fischer, J., Hahn, D., Frey, D., Kastenmüller, A., & Fischer, P. (2012). A man’s best friend – How the presence of a dog decreases mental distress after social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 446–449.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). The American Time Use Survey. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/atus_06242015.htm.
- DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. J., Carter, E. C., McCullough, M. E., Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., & Nezlek, J. B. (2014). Explaining the relationship between religiousness and substance use: Self-control matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 339–351.Google Scholar
- Eck, J., Schoel, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2016a). All you need is love? Feeling connected results in more negative reactions to ostracism than feeling independent. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
- Eck, J., Schoel, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2016b). Belonging to a majority reduces the immediate need threat from ostracism in individuals with a high need to belong. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
- Galinsky, A. D., Rus, D., & Lammers, J. (2011). Power: A central force governing psychological, social, and organizational life. In D. De Cremer, R. van Dick, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Knowles, M. L. (2005). Social “snacking” and social “shielding”: The satisfaction of belonging needs through the use of social symbols and the social self. In K. Williams, J. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 227–241). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, E. B. (2007). Sensation and perception (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth-Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
- Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and parasocial interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Process, 19, 215–229.Google Scholar
- Knowles, M. L. (2007). The nature of parasocial relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
- Knowles, M. L. (2013). Belonging regulation through the use of (para)social surrogates. In C. N. DeWall (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (pp. 275–285). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kruglanski, A. W., & Mackie, D. M. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 229–261). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
- McCourt, A., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2001). The role of personal characteristics and romantic characteristics in parasocial relationships: A pilot study. Journal of Mundane Behavior. Retrieved from http://mundanebehavior.org/category/issues/issue2-1.
- Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209–239). New York, NY: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Rudert, S. C., & Greifeneder, R. (2016). When it’s okay that I don’t play: Social norms and the situated construal of social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 955–969.Google Scholar
- Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 275–314). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
- WIN/Gallup International. (2015). Losing our religion? Two thirds of people still claim to be religious. Retrieved from http://www.wingia.com/en/news/losing_our_religion_two_thirds_of_people_still_claim_to_be_religious/290/.