Sustainability in the University Curriculum: Teaching Introductory Economics

Chapter

Abstract

Economics is the study of human behavior in relation to a resource-constrained world. The discipline is a behavioral science. From this perspective, economics incorporates the evaluation of both individual and societal behavior within the context of prevailing cultural values to assess resource use, constraints and sustainability relative to anthropomorphic or human-focused resource utilization. However, many cultural values can be described as legacy, defined as an inheritance from a previous generation. Additionally and related, unless there is a continuous assessment and reassessment of and between social actions and societal frameworks, there can be a delay in the needed responsiveness to modify cultural values. The latter statement addresses the need for promoting awareness of the parameters that define sustainable consumption. This paper explores one example of how increasing awareness of the assumptions embedded within supply and demand, as overtly visible in “fair” market prices, can increase awareness of the inherent responsibility of consumption decisions. Using a replicable life cycle cost assessment assignment, the author provides a rationale and outcome for the incorporation of a sustainability project in the teaching of introductory economics.

Keywords

Education Economics Life cycle analysis Sustainability Consumption 

References

  1. Daly, H. E. (1996). Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  2. Daly, H. E. (2014). From uneconomic growth to a steady-state economy. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dietz, R., & O’Neill, D. W. (2013). Enough is enough: Building a sustainable economy in a world of finite resources. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Fischer, J., Dyball, R., Fazey, I., Gross, C., Dovers, S., Ehrlich, P. R., et al. (2012). Human behavior and sustainability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(3), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hards, S. (2011). Social practice and the evolution of personal environmental values. Environ. Values, 20, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knoedler, J. T., & Underwood, D. A. (2003). Teaching the Principles of Economics: A Proposal for a Multi-Paradigmatic Approach. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(3), 697–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nelson, R. H. (1995). Sustainability, Efficiency, and God: Economic Values and the Sustainability Debate. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sen, A. (2010). Adam Smith and the contemporary world. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 3(1), 50–67.Google Scholar
  9. UNESCO Culture Sector. (2000). World culture report. Paris: France.Google Scholar
  10. United States Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). SuperTracker. Retrieved from https://www.supertracker.usda.gov
  11. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/
  12. Venkatesan, M. (2015). Economic principles: A primer, A foundation in sustainable practices. Mathews, NC: Kona Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsBridgewater State UniversityBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations