Advertisement

The Common Link Between Policies Conducive to Both the Demographic Dividend and Fertility Transition

  • Anrudh K. JainEmail author
Part of the Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development book series (DTSD, volume 6)

Abstract

A window of opportunity for fast economic growth is created by sustained fertility decline. However, its realization depends upon the quality (education and skills) of the labor force and economic policies. Fertility decline from about 6 to 2.4 births between the 1960s and 2011 in India has raised the prospects of a demographic dividend, although the timing and the pace of fertility decline have not been uniform among the major states. Consequently, the potential for reaping the benefits of a demographic dividend also differs among states. This chapter traces the common link between policies that contribute to fertility transition and create the right kind of environment for reaping the benefit of a demographic dividend. The data used for major states in India suggest this link to be the early investment in social development (education and health). For example, southern states made earlier investments in social development and experienced fertility transition early. They now have a better-educated labor force and hence are reaping the benefit of a demographic dividend by transforming the window of opportunity into faster economic growth. By contrast, northern states did not invest adequately in social development early and are now lagging behind in both fertility transition and the quality of the labor force. They are not ready to reap the benefits of a demographic dividend. These state-level differences have implications for national-level trends.

Keywords

Total Fertility Rate Fertility Decline Family Planning Program Fertility Transition Northern State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adlakha, A., & Kirk, D. (1974). Vital rates in India 1961–71 estimated from 1971 census data.Population Studies, 28(3), 381–400.Google Scholar
  2. Aiyer, S. & Mody A. (2011).The demographic dividend: Evidence from the Indian states (IMF Working Paper 38).http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp1138.pdf.
  3. Bhat, P. N. M., Preston, S. H., & Dyson, T. (1984).Vital rates in India, 1961–81. Committee on population and demography. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Report No. 24.Google Scholar
  4. Bhat, P. N. M. (1998a). Contours of fertility decline in India: An analysis of district-level trends from two recent censes. In M. George, M. Das Gupta, & L. C. Chen (Eds.),Reproductive change in India and Brazil. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bhat, P. N. M. (1998b). Regional differences in Indian fertility. In M. George, M. Das Gupta, & L. C. Chen (Eds.),Reproductive change in India and Brazil. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003).The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
  7. Bongaarts, J., Mauldin, W. P., & Phillips, J. F. (1990). The demographic impact of family planning programs.Studies in Family Planning, 21(6), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bose, A. (1985). Demography beyond decimal points, presidential address delivered at the tenth annual conference of the Indian association of population, Bangalore. In: Bose A. (Ed.), 1988. From population to people. New Delhi: B. R. Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  9. Chandrasekhar, C. P., Ghose, J., & Roychowdhury, A. (2006). The ‘Demographic Dividend’ and young India’s economic future.Economic and Political Weekly, 41(49), 5055–5064.Google Scholar
  10. Cuaresma, J. C., Lutz, W., & Sanderson, W. (2014). Is the demographic dividend an education dividend?Demography, 51, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cutright, P. (1983). The ingredients of recent fertility decline in developing countries.International Family Planning Perspectives, 9(4), 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Debpuur, C., Phillips, J. F., Jackson, E. F., Nazzar, A., Ngom, P., & Binka, F. N. (2002). The impact of the Navrongo Project on contraceptive knowledge and use, reproductive preferences, and fertility.Studies in Family Planning, 33(2), 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drèze, J., & Murthi, M. (2001). Fertility, education, and development: Evidence from India.Population and Development Review, 27(1), 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freedman, R., & Berelson, B. (1976). The record of family planning programs.Studies in Family Planning, 7(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Government of India (GOI). (2014).Report of the expert group to review the methodology for measurement of poverty. New Delhi: Planning Commission.http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/pov_rep0707.pdf. Accessed on 14 July 2014.Google Scholar
  16. Guilmoto, C. Z., & Irudaya Rajan, S. (2001). Spatial patterns of fertility transition in Indian districts.Population and Development Review, 27(4), 713–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (1995).National family health survey 1992–1993. Bombay: IIPS.Google Scholar
  18. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (2000).National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2) 1998–1999. Bombay: IIPS.Google Scholar
  19. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (2005).Facility survey (under reproductive and child health project phase—II, 2003). India: IIPS.Google Scholar
  20. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (2006).District level household survey (DLHS-2), 2002–04. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  21. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (2007).National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) 2005–2006. Bombay: IIPS.Google Scholar
  22. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Population Council. (2009).Youth in India situation and needs study 2006–2007, Bihar. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  23. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (2009a).Youth in India situation and needs study 2006–2007. Jharkhand. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  24. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). (2009b).Youth in India situation and needs study 2006–2007, Tamil Nadu. Mumbai: IIPS.Google Scholar
  25. Jain, A. K. (1985). The impact of development and population policies on fertility in India.Studies in Family Planning, 16(4), 181–198.Google Scholar
  26. Jain, A. K., & Adlakha, A. L. (1982). Preliminary estimates of fertility decline in India during the 1970s.Population and Development Review, 8(3), 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jain, A. K., & Jain, A. (2012). Family planning and fertility in India. In Z. Wasim, H. Masnin, & J. Loftus (Eds.),Family planning in Asia and the pacific: Addressing the challenges. Selangore: International Council on Management of Population Programmes (ICOMP).Google Scholar
  28. Jain, A. K., & Ross, J. (2012). Fertility differences among developing countries: Are they still related to family planning program efforts and social settings?International Perspective on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(1), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. James, K. S. (2008). Glorifying Malthus: Current debate on ‘Demographic Dividend’ in India.Economic and Political Weekly, 43(21), 63–69.Google Scholar
  30. Krishnan, T. N. (1998). Social development and fertility reduction in Kerala. In M. George, M. Das Gupta, & L. C. Chen (Eds.),Reproductive change in India and Brazil. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mason, A. (Ed.). (2001).Population change and economic development in east Asia: Challenges met, opportunities seized. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mauldin, W. P., & Berelson, B. (1978). Conditions of fertility decline in developing countries, 1965–1975.Studies in Family Planning, 9(5), 90–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nag, M. (1984). Fertility differentials in Kerala and west Bengal: Equity fertility hypothesis as explanation.Economic and Political Weekly, XIX(1), 33–41.Google Scholar
  34. Phillips, J. F., Simmons, R., Koenig, M. A., & Chakraborty, J. (1988). Determinants of reproductive change in a traditional society: Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh.Studies in Family Planning, 19(6), 313–334.Google Scholar
  35. Registrar General, India (RGI). (1983).Survey on infant and child mortality 1979. New Delhi: RGI.Google Scholar
  36. Registrar General, India (RGI). (2006).Population projections for India and states 2001–26. Report of the technical group on population projections constituted by the national commission on population. New Delhi: RGI.Google Scholar
  37. Registrar General, India (RGI). (2009).Compendium of India’s fertility and mortality indicators based on the Sample Registration System (SRS): 1971–2007. New Delhi: RGI.Google Scholar
  38. Registrar General, India (RGI). (2013).Sample registration system: Statistical report 2012. New Delhi: RGI.Google Scholar
  39. Rele, J. R. (1987). Fertility levels and trends in India, 1951–1981.Population and Development Review, 13(3), 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Satia, J. K., & Jejeebhoy, S. J. (Eds.). (1991).The demographic challenge: A study of four large Indian states. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Srinivasan, K., Saxena, P. C., Roy, T. K., & Verma, R. K. (1991). Effect of family planning program components on contraceptive acceptance in four Indian states.International Family Planning Perspective, 17(1), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. United Nations. (2009).World population prospects, the 2008 revision (Comprehensive Tables. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, Vol. 1). New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Distinguished ScholarPopulation CouncilNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations