An Ontology Based Scheme for Formal Care Plan Meta-Description

  • Eleni KaldoudiEmail author
  • George Drosatos
  • Nick Portokallidis
  • Allan Third
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 57)


Contemporary healthcare delivery is based on state-of-the-art scientific best practices captured in systematically developed formal care plans which include guidelines, clinical protocols, integrated care pathways, etc. Research so far has addressed the computerized execution of formal care plans by developing a number of related representation languages, execution engines and integrated platforms to support real time care plan execution. However, much less effort has been put into organizing available formal care plans. In this paper we propose a conceptual model and an ontology for a meta-description of the formal care plan. The proposed conceptual model and ontology allows semantic tagging and enrichment of clinical protocols so that they can be used and reused across platforms and also be linked directly to other relevant scientific information, e.g. published works in Pub-Med or personal health records, and other clinical information systems. It also allows modelling of the provenance and justifications for modifications or alterations to care plans.


Ontology Conceptual model Clinical algorithm Clinical practice guideline Care pathway 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Greenfield S (1978) Clinical algorithms. West J Med 129:230-231Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Field MJ, Lohr KN (Eds.) (1992) Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al. (1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282:1458-1465.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trivedi MH, Kern JK, Marcee A, et al (2002) Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions. Methods Inf Med, 41: 435-442Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Isern D, Moreno A (2008) Computer-based execution of clinical guidelines: a review. International journal of medical informatics, 77(12):787-808Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peleg M (2013) Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review. Journal of biomedical informatics, 46(4):744-763Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peleg M, Boxwala A A, Ogunyemi O et al. (2000) GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, pp 645–649Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Musen M, Tu S, Das A, et al. (1996) EON: a component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3(6):367–388Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shahar Y, Miksch S, Johnson P (1998) The Asgaard project: a task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines. Artificial intelligence in medicine, 14(1):29-51Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quaglini S, Stefanelli M, Lanzola G et al. (2001) Flexible guide-line-based patient careflow systems. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 22:65–80Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sutton D R, Fox J (2003) The syntax and semantics of the PROforma guideline modeling language. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10(5):433–443Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mansour E, Wu B, Dube K et al. (2006) An event-driven approach to computerizing clinical guidelines using XML. Proceedings of the IEEE Services Computing Workshops (SCW2006), Chicago, USA, IEEE Computer Society, pp 13–20Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang D, Shortliffe E H (2002) GLEE--a model-driven execution system for computer-based implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Proceedings of American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium (AMIA 2002), San Antonio, USA, pp 855–859Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tu S W, Campbell J R, Glasgow J (2007) The SAGE guideline model: achievements and overview. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(5):589–598Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shahar Y, Young O, Shalom E et al. (2004) A framework for a distributed, hybrid, multiple-ontology clinical-guideline library and automated guideline-support tools. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 37(5):325–344Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ciccarese P, Caffi E, Quaglini S et al. (2005) Architectures and tools for innovative health information systems: the guide project. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74:553–562Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dube K, Mansour E, Wu B (2005) Supporting collaboration and information sharing in computer-based clinical guideline management. Proceedings of 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer- based Medical Systems (CBMS 2005), Dublin, Ireland, pp 232-237Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sutton D R, Fox J (2003) The Syntax and Semantics of the PROforma Guideline Modeling Language, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10(5), pp 433-443.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    InferMed (2013) Arezzo Technical White Paper, Tech. rep., InferMed Ltd. URL: (Accessed: 12-Jan-2013)
  20. 20.
    Isern D, Moreno A (2004) Agent-based careflow using CPGs. Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, Vol. 113 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press, 2004, pp 11–18Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Isern D, Sánchez D, Moreno A (2007) HeCaSe2: a multi-agent ontology-driven guideline enactment engine. Proceedings of Fifth International Central and Eastern European Conference on Multi-agent Systems (CEEMAS 2007), Vol. 4696 of LNAI, Springer, pp 322–324Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ciccarese P, Caffi E, Boiocchi L et al. (2004) A guideline management system. Proceedings of 11th World Congress of the International Medical Informatics Association (MEDINFO 2004), Vol. 107 of Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, San Francisco, USA, IOS Press, pp 28–32Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK (2015) NICE advice. URL:, (Accessed: 6-Oct-2015)
  24. 24.
    Vanhaecht K, Panella M, Zelm R et al. (2010) An overview of the history and concept of care pathways as complex interventions. Int J Care Pathways 14:117-123GRADE Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal (BMJ), 328:1490-1494Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    GRADE working group (2015) Organizations that have endorsed or that are using GRADE. URL: (Accessed: 6-Oct-2015)
  26. 26.
    Quaglini S (2008) Compliance with clinical practice guidelines. Stud Health Technol Inform, IOS Press, pp 160–179Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Becker G J, Wheeler D C, Zeeuw D D (2012) KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int, 2:337–414Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Motik B, Patel-Schneider P F, Parsia B et al. (2009) OWL 2 web ontology language: Structural specification and functional-style syntax. W3C recommendation, 27(65)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gennari J, Musen M, Fergerson R et al. (2003) The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(1):89–123Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Noy N F, Shah N H, Whetzel P L, et al (2009) BioPortal: ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse. Nucleic Acids Res 1:37, BioPortal can be accessed at
  31. 31.
    International Classification of Diseases v10 (ICD-10) at
  32. 32.
    Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) at
  33. 33.
    Quantity, Unit, Dimension and Type Ontologies (QUDT) at
  34. 34.
    The Ontology of Units of Measurement (UO) at
  35. 35.
    Third A, Kaldoudi E, Gotsis G et al. (2015) Capturing Scientific Knowledge on Medical Risk Factors. K-CAP2015: 8th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, ACM, Palisades, NY, USA (In Press 7-Oct-2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    D’Arcus B, Giasson F (2009) Bibliographic ontology specification. URL: (Accessed: 8-Oct-2015)
  37. 37.
    Sure Y, Bloehdorn S, Haase P et al. (2005) The SWRC ontology-semantic web for research communities. Proceedings of the 12th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 2005), Vol. 3808 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Covilha, Portugal, Springer, pp 218-231Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) at

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleni Kaldoudi
    • 1
    Email author
  • George Drosatos
    • 1
  • Nick Portokallidis
    • 1
  • Allan Third
    • 2
  1. 1.School of MedicineDemocritus University of ThraceAlexandroupoliGreece
  2. 2.Knowledge Media Institute, Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations