An Essential Tool for Continuous Assessment: The Learning Portfolio

Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the rationale for the adoption of the learning portfolio (LP) as a tool for improving instruction, providing a means of continuous assessment, providing structured and systematic feedback to learners, and keeping track of their progress throughout a course. The chapter then describes the implementation stages of the LP at Sabancı University School of Languages (SL) in Turkey and presents an assessment of the current practices and procedures. Finally, future goals are proposed in light of the collected feedback.

Keywords

Learning portfolios Continuous assessment Turkey Learner development Process writing 

References

  1. Bag, M., Dobie, G., Einer, J., Ferris, D., Garinger, D., Mustafa, A., & Yanova, J. M. (2003a). Beyond the boundariesEnglish in an academic environmentLevel One book one. Sabancı University Press. Google Scholar
  2. Bag, M., Dobie, G., Einer, J., Ferris, D., Garinger, D., Mustafa, A., & Yanova, J. M. (2003b). Beyond the boundariesEnglish in an academic environmentLevel One book two. Sabancı University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barootchi, N., & Keshavarz, M. H. (2002). Assessment of achievement through portfolios and teacher-made tests. Educational Research, 44(39), 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  5. Elbow, P. (1994). Will the virtues of portfolios blind us to their potential dangers? In L. Black, D. A. Daiker, J. Sommers, & G. Stygall (Eds.), New directions in portfolio assessment: Reflective practice, critical theory, and largescale scoring (pp. 40–55). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
  6. Fulcher, G. (2010). Practical language testing. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  7. Huot, Brian. (1994). Beyond the classroom: Using portfolios to assess writing. In L. Black, D. A. Daiker, J. Sommers, & G. Stygall (Eds.), New directions in portfolio assessment: Reflective practice, critical theory; and large-scale scoring (pp. 325–334). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
  8. Huot, B. (2002). (Re)-articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Klenowski, V. (2002). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  10. Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60–63.Google Scholar
  11. Trevitt, C., Stocks, C., & Quinlan, K. M. (2011). Advancing assessment practice in continuing professional learning: Toward a richer understanding of teaching portfolios for learning and assessment. International Journal for Academic Development, 17(2), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wolf, D. P., & Reardon, S. F. (1996). Access to excellence through new forms of student assessment. In D. P. Wolf & J. B. Baron (Eds.), Performance-based student assessment: Challenges and possibilities. Ninety-fifth yearbook of the national society for the study of education, part I (pp. 1–31). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sabancı UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations