Domestic Robotics

  • Erwin PrasslerEmail author
  • Mario E. Munich
  • Paolo Pirjanian
  • Kazuhiro Kosuge
Part of the Springer Handbooks book series (SHB)


When the first edition of this book was published domestic robots were spoken of as a dream that was slowly becoming reality. At that time, in 2008, we looked back on more than twenty years of research and development in domestic robotics, especially in cleaning robotics. Although everybody expected cleaning to be the killer app for domestic robotics in the first half of these twenty years nothing big really happened. About ten years before the first edition of this book appeared, all of a sudden things started moving. Several small, but also some larger enterprises announced that they would soon launch domestic cleaning robots. The robotics community was anxiously awaiting these first cleaning robots and so were consumers. The big burst, however, was yet to come. The price tag of those cleaning robots was far beyond what people were willing to pay for a vacuum cleaner. It took another four years until, in 2002, a small and inexpensive device, which was not even called a cleaning robot, brought the first breakthrough: Roomba. Sales of the Roomba quickly passed the first million robots and increased rapidly. While for the first years after Roomba’s release, the big players remained on the sidelines, possibly to revise their own designs and, in particular their business models and price tags, some other small players followed quickly and came out with their own products. We reported about theses devices and their creators in the first edition. Since then the momentum in the field of domestics robotics has steadily increased. Nowadays most big appliance manufacturers have domestic cleaning robots in their portfolio. We are not only seeing more and more domestic cleaning robots and lawn mowers on the market, but we are also seeing new types of domestic robots, window cleaners, plant watering robots, tele-presence robots, domestic surveillance robots, and robotic sports devices. Some of these new types of domestic robots are still prototypes or concept studies. Others have already crossed the threshold to becoming commercial products.

For the second edition of this chapter, we have decided to not only enumerate the devices that have emerged and survived in the past five years, but also to take a look back at how it all began, contrasting this retrospection with the burst of progress in the past five years in domestic cleaning robotics. We will not describe and discuss in detail every single cleaning robot that has seen the light of the day, but select those that are representative for the evolution of the technology as well as the market. We will also reserve some space for new types of mobile domestic robots, which will be the success stories or failures for the next edition of this chapter. Further we will look into nonmobile domestic robots, also called smart appliances, and examine their fate. Last but not least, we will look at the recent developments in the area of intelligent homes that surround and, at times, also control the mobile domestic robots and smart appliances described in the preceding sections.


Inertial Measurement Unit Smart Home Docking Station Cleaning Robot Domestic Robot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.







Japan National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology


business to business


bill of material


Consumer Electronics Show


complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor


central processing unit


ceiling vision SLAM


extended Kalman filter


US Food and Drug Association


global positioning system


human–computer interaction


high definition


Internationale Funk Ausstellung


inertial measurement unit


Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation


intellectual property right




light-emitting diode




random access memory


radio frequency identification


root mean square


remote presence virtual + independent telemedicine assistant


room positioning system


sensorized environment for life


simultaneous localization and mapping




  1. 65.1
    P. Ljunggren: Intelligent machines, Personal CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  2. 65.2
    R.D. Schraft, M. Hägele, K. Wegener: Service-Roboter-Visionen (Hanser, Munich 2004)Google Scholar
  3. 65.3
    A. Albert: Robert-Bosch GmbH, Personal CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  4. 65.4
  5. 65.5
    K. Konolige, J. Augenbraun, N. Donaldson, C. Fiebig, P. Shah: A low-cost laser distance sensor, Proc. Int. Conf. Robotics Autom. (ICRA), Pasadena (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 65.6
  7. 65.7
    P. Ridden: Joggobot turns a quadrocopter into a running companion, Gizmag, June 11 (2012)
  8. 65.8
    B. Freedman, A. Shpunt, J. Arieli: Distance-varying illumination and imaging techniques for depth mapping, US Patent 0290698 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 65.9
    A. Shpunt, A. Zlesky: Depth-varying light fields for three dimensional sensing, US Patent 2008/0106746 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 65.10
  11. 65.11
    Apple (Primesense):
  12. 65.12
    J.-S. Gutmann, K. Culp, M. Munich, P. Pirjanian: The social impact of a systematic floor cleaner, ARSO Munich (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 65.13
    J.-S. Gutmann, E. Eade, P. Fong, M. Munich: Vector field SLAM – localization by learning the spatial variation of continuous signals, Trans. Robotics 28(3), 650–667 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 65.14
    W. Jeong, K. Lee: CV-SLAM: A new ceiling vision-based SLAM technique, Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS) (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 65.15
    J.-S. Gutmann, D. Goel, M. Munich: Scaling vector field SLAM to large environments, Proc. IAS, Jeju (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 65.16
    J.-S. Gutmann, P. Fong, M. Munich: Localization in a vector field map, Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS) (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 65.17
    N. Karlsson, E.D. Bernardo, J. Ostrowski, L. Goncalves, P. Pirjanian, M.E. Munich: The vSLAM algorithm for robust localization and mapping, Proc. Int. Conf. Robotics Autom. (ICRA) (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 65.18
    E. Eade, P. Fong, M. Munich: Monocular graph SLAM with complexity reduction, IROS (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 65.19
    M. Cummins, P. Newman: Accelerated appearance-only SLAM, Proc. Int. Conf. Robotics Autom. (ICRA), Pasadena (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 65.20
    E. Eade, T. Drummond: Monocular slam as a graph of coalesced observations, Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV'07), Rio de Janeiro (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 65.21
    E. Eade, T. Drummond: Unified loop closing and recovery for real time monocular slam, Proc. Br. Mach. Vis. Conf. (BMVC'08) Leeds (2008) pp. 53–62Google Scholar
  22. 65.22
    K. Konolige, J. Bowman, J.D. Chen, P. Mihelich, M. Calonder, V. Lepetit, P. Fua: View-based maps, Proc. Robotics Sci. Syst. Seattle (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 65.23
    D.G. Lowe: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints, Proceedings IJCV (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 65.24
    Pmdtechnologies GmbH:
  25. 65.25
    S. Thrun, W. Burgard, D. Fox: Probabilistic Robotics (MIT Press, Cambridge 2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 65.26
    J. Neira, J. D. Tard os: Data association in stochastic mapping using the joint compatibility test, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 17(6), 890–897 (2001) Google Scholar
  27. 65.27
    S. Thrun, D. Fox, W. Burgard: A probabilistic approach to concurrent mapping and localization for mobile robots, Mach. Learn. 31, 29–53 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 65.28
    D. Hähnel, S. Thrun, B. Wegbreit, W. Burgard: Towards lazy data association in SLAM, Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Robotics Res. (ISRR), Sienna (2003) pp. 421–431Google Scholar
  29. 65.29
  30. 65.30
    Robert Bosch GmbH:
  31. 65.31
    E. Prassler, K. Kosuge: Domestic robotics. In: Springer Handbook of Robotics, ed. by B. Siciliano, O. Khatib (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2008) pp. 1253–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 65.32
    D. Gann, J. Barlow, T. Venables: Digital Futures: Making Homes Smarter. Report published by Chartered Institute of Housing (Chartered Institute of Housing, Coventry 1999)Google Scholar
  33. 65.33
    R. Harper: Inside the Smart Home (Springer, London 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 65.34
    Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association:
  35. 65.35
    Gator Tech Smart House:
  36. 65.36
    Aware Home Research Initiative:
  37. 65.37
    T. Hori, Y. Nishida, T. Suehiro, S. Hirai: SELF-Network: Design and implementation of network for distributed embedded sensors, IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. IROS (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erwin Prassler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mario E. Munich
    • 2
  • Paolo Pirjanian
    • 3
  • Kazuhiro Kosuge
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Computer SciencesBonn-Rhein-Sieg Univ. of Applied SciencesSankt AugustinGermany
  2. 2.iRobot Corp.PasadenaUSA
  3. 3.iRobot Corp.BedfordUSA
  4. 4.System Robotics LaboratoryTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations