Science and Education at the Centre for Invasion Biology

  • Sarah J. Davies
  • G. John Measey
  • Dorette du Plessis
  • David M. Richardson
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)


South Africa has severe problems caused by biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems, and a long history of managing biological invasions. However, appreciation and systematic study of the problems associated with invasive species are relatively recent. In 2004, the Centre for Invasion Biology (CIB) was established as one of the first six national Centres of Excellence funded by the South African government. The aim of the DST-NRF Centres of Excellence is to concentrate existing capacity and resources to enable researchers to collaborate across disciplines on long-term projects that are locally relevant and internationally competitive. Understanding the biological and ecological underpinnings of invasions is crucial, but much emphasis is placed on understanding the ‘human dimensions’ of invasions, and on seeking solutions for current problems, and techniques for preventing new invasions. Education is a critical component of this knowledge-building process, and the CIB infuses education for sustainable development into all of its activities. The Centre conducts education and outreach at the secondary school, under-graduate, post-graduate and post-doctoral levels, and in the workplace to develop capacity at all levels. The Centre’s flagship outreach programme, Iimbovane, aims to increase environmental literacy and inspire secondary school learners to take up scientific careers through facilitating field and laboratory work that is embedded in the life science curriculum; the programme focuses on under-resourced schools. At tertiary level, the under-graduate training course in invasion biology presented at Stellenbosch University provides an introduction to the exciting and important field of invasion science for final-year Bachelor degree students. A distributed network of researchers located in universities and research institutions around South Africa also trains 50–60 post-graduate students, and hosts ten to twelve post-doctoral researchers each year, through whom much of the Centre’s research is conducted. In the working world, members are involved both in citizen science programmes on invasive species and in collaborative work with partner organisations which implement invasive species management programmes, provide employment opportunities for graduates of the Centre, and form a source of working (part-time) graduate students.


Invasive Species Citizen Science Partner Organisation Invasion Biology Citizen Science Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was funded by the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology, and by donations from Rand Merchant Bank Fund and AfriSam. The Western Cape Education Department hosts and supports the work of the Iimbovane Outreach Project in schools. The authors are grateful to Mrs C.M. Momberg, CIB for collating data on the CIB’s performance.


  1. Ballouard, J.-M., Brischoux, F., & Bonnet, X. (2011). Children prioritize virtual exotic biodiversity over local biodiversity. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, M. F., Branch, W. R., Bauer, A. M., Burger, M., Marais, J., Alesander, G. J., et al. (eds.) (2014). Atlas and red list of the reptiles of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Biodiversity Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., et al. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59, 977–984.Google Scholar
  4. Braschler, B. (2009). Successfully implementing a citizen-scientist approach to insect monitoring in a resource-poor country. BioScience, 59, 103–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braschler, B., Mahood, K., Karenyi, N., Gaston, K. J., & Chown, S. L. (2010). Realizing a synergy between research and education: How participation in ant monitoring helps raise biodiversity awareness in a resource-poor country. Journal of Insect Conservation, 14, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cosentino, B. J., Marsh, D. M., Jones, K. S., Apodaca, J. J., Bates, C., Beach, J., et al. (2014). Citizen science reveals widespread negative effects of roads on amphibian distributions. Biological Conservation, 180, 31–38.Google Scholar
  7. Crall, A. W., Gregory, G. J., Jarnevich, C. S., Stohlgren, T. J., Waller, D. M., & Graham, J. (2010). Improving and integrating data on invasive species collected by citizen scientists. Biological Invasions, 12, 3419–3428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Villiers, F. A., de Kock, M., & Measey, G. J. (2015). Controlling the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis to conserve the Cape platanna Xenopus gilli in South Africa. Conservation Evidence, 12.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Science and Technology. (2008). Innovation towards a knowledge-based economy: Ten-year plan for South Africa (2008–2018).Google Scholar
  10. Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J. Güneralp, B., Marcotullio P. J., McDonald, R. I., et al. (2013). Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities, a global assessment (p. 755). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Fogell, D. J., Tolley, K. A., & Measey, G. J. (2013). Mind the gaps: Investigating the cause of the current range disjunction in the Cape Platanna, Xenopus gilli (Anura: Pipidae). PeerJ, 1, e166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Measey, G. J., Annecke, W., Davies, S. J., Dorse, C., Stafford, L., Tolley, K. A., et al. (2014). Cape collaborations for amphibian solutions. FrogLog, 109, 46–47.Google Scholar
  13. Measey, G. J., & Davies, S. J. (2011). Struggling against domestic exotics at the southern end of Africa. FrogLog, 97, 28–30.Google Scholar
  14. Mecenero, S., Ball, J. B., Edge, D. A., Hamer, M. L., Henning, G. A., Krüger, M., et al. (Eds.). (2013). Conservation assessment of butterflies of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland: Red list and atlas. Cape Town: Saftronics, Johannesburg and Animal Demography Unit.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, J. R. (2005). Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 430–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Minter, L. R., Burger, M., Harrison, J. A., Braack, H. H., Bishop, P. J., & Kloepfer, D. (Eds.). (2004). Atlas and red data book of the frogs of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  17. Mouton, J. (2011). Doctoral production in South Africa: Statistics, challenges and responses. Perspectives in Education: The changing face of doctoral education in South Africa (Special Issue 3), 29, 13–29.Google Scholar
  18. Novoa, A., Kaplan, H., Kumschick, S., Wilson, J. R. U., & Richardson, D. M. (2015). Soft touch or heavy hand? Legislative approaches for preventing invasions: Insights from cacti in South Africa. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 8, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D. M. (2010). Invasive species, environmental change and management, and ecosystem health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Richardson, D. M. (2011). Invasion science: The roads travelled and the roads ahead. In D. M. Richardson (Ed.), Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton (pp. 397–407). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., & Carlton, J. T. (2011). A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology. In D. M Richardson (Ed.), Fifty years of invasion ecology. The legacy of Charles Elton (pp. 409–420). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Shackleton, R. T., Le Maitre, D. C., van Wilgen, B. W., & Richardson, D. M. (2015). Use of non-timber forest products from invasive alien Prosopis species (mesquite) and native trees in South Africa: Implications for management. Forest Ecosystems, 2, 16. doi: 10.1186/s40663-015-0040-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silvertown, J., Buesching, C. D., Jacobson, S. K., & Rebelo, T. (2013). Citizen science and nature conservation. Key Topics in Conservation Biology, 2, 124–142.Google Scholar
  25. Silvertown, J., Harvey, M., Greenwood, R., Dodd, M., Rosewell, J., Rebelo, T., et al. (2015). Crowdsourcing the identification of organisms: A case-study of iSpot. ZooKeys, 480, 125–146.Google Scholar
  26. Turner, W. R., Nakamura, T., & Dinetti, M. (2004). Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. BioScience, 54, 585–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Wilgen, B. W., Davies, S. J., & Richardson, D. M. (2014). Invasion science for society: A decade of contributions from the Centre for Invasion Biology. South African Journal of Science, 110(7/8), 12p (Art. #a0074).
  28. Van Wilgen, B. W., & Richardson, D. M. (2012). Three centuries of managing introduced conifers in South Africa: Benefits, impacts, changing perceptions and conflict resolution. Journal of Environmental Management, 106, 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah J. Davies
    • 1
  • G. John Measey
    • 1
  • Dorette du Plessis
    • 1
  • David M. Richardson
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and ZoologyStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations