Advertisement

Protecting Soil Biodiversity and Soil Functions: Current Status and Future Challenges

  • Sara MendesEmail author
  • Anabela Marisa Azul
  • Paula Castro
  • Jörg Römbke
  • José Paulo Sousa
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Living soils are fundamental for human life as we know it. The top layer of Earth’s crust, essentially composed of minerals, water and air, harbours an immense variety of organisms, from plants to microorganisms, which qualifies it as a living system. Soil biodiversity is the main actor underlying the provision of services that are essential for regulating, providing and supporting human life. The increasing level of human activity has been subjecting soil to multiple pressures, resulting in soil degradation and biodiversity decline, hence deterioration in the system’s capability to render those ecosystem services. Growing concern on this resource’s misuse has led to a series of conventions and strategies targeting its conservation (such as the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection in the European Union (EC) 2006) and advocating for specific protection measures that can ensure a sustainable use of soil. These measures mainly focus on extending our knowledge on how soil functions but also on developing monitoring programmes that can detect trends and changes in soil biodiversity. This demand boosted research on soil ecology over the last decades, with significant increases of scientific knowledge on its structural and functioning complexity. However, there are still some gaps and needs to be addressed in order to design adequate measures for soil protection. In this chapter we review the main advances in soil ecological research and monitoring and further discuss the status of current strategies towards soil protection and sustainability. Moreover, we present here a strategy, consisting of three action lines, for effectively contributing to soil protection. It is based on monitoring and mapping, experimentation and raising awareness towards soil issues, which hopefully can change the way we perceive and use soil, this very dynamic but non-renewable resource at the human life time scale.

Keywords

Ecosystem Service Soil Function Soil Organism Soil Protection Ecosystem Service Provision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arrouays, D., Jolivet, C., Boulonne, L., Bodineau, G., Saby, N., & Grolleau, E. (2002). Une initiative nouvelle en France: La mise en place d’un réseau institutionnel de mesure de la qualité des sols (RMQS). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie d’Agriculture de France, 88(5), 93–103.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, G. H., Thumlert, T. A., Meisel, L. S., Carter, P. J., & Kilpin, G. P. (1997). “Earthworms Downunder”: A survey of the earthworm fauna of urban and agricultural soils in Australia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29(3–4), 589–597. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00184-8
  3. Bandow, C., Ng, E. L., Schmelz, R. M., Sousa, J. P., & Römbke, J. (2016). A TME study with the fungicide pyrimethanil combined with different moisture regimes: Effects on enchytraeids. Ecotoxicology, 25(1), 213–224. doi: 10.1007/s10646-015-1581-y
  4. Banwart, S. (2011). Save our soils. Nature, 474(7350), 151–152. doi: 10.1038/474151a
  5. Bardgett, R. D., & van der Putten, W. H. (2014). Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature, 515(7528), 505–511. doi: 10.1038/nature13855
  6. Beck, L., Römbke, J., Breure, A. M., & Mulder, C. (2005). Considerations for the use of soil ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62(2 SPEC. ISS.), 189–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.024
  7. Bispo, A., Cluzeau, D., Creamer, R., Dombos, M., Graefe, U., Krogh, P., et al. (2009). Indicators for monitoring soil biodiversity. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5(4), 717. doi: 10.1897/IEAM-2009-064.1
  8. Black, H. I., Parekh, N., Chaplow, J., Monson, F., Watkins, J., Creamer, R., et al. (2003). Assessing soil biodiversity across Great Britain: National trends in the occurrence of heterotrophic bacteria and invertebrates in soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 67(3), 255–266. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00178-0
  9. Breure, A. M., & Römbke, J. (2005). The ecological classification and assessment of soils. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62(2), 185–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.022
  10. Brussaard, L. (2012). Ecosystem Services Provided by the Soil Biota. In D. H. Wall, R. D. Bardgett, V. Behan-Pelletier, J. E. Herrick, T. H. Jones, K. Ritz, et al. (Eds.), Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services (pp. 45–58). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burkhardt, U., Russell, D. J., Decker, P., Döhler, M., Höfer, H., Lesch, S., et al. (2014). The Edaphobase project of GBIF-Germany—A new online soil-zoological data warehouse. Applied Soil Ecology, 83, 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.03.021
  12. Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. COM(2006) 232 final. Brussels.Google Scholar
  13. Creamer, R. E., Hannula, S. E., Leeuwen, J. P. V., Stone, D., Rutgers, M., Schmelz, R. M., et al. (2015). Ecological network analysis reveals the inter-connection between soil biodiversity and ecosystem function as affected by land use across Europe. Applied Soil Ecology, 97, 112–124. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.006
  14. de Bello, F., Lavorel, S., Díaz, S., Harrington, R., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Bardgett, R. D., et al. (2010). Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(10), 2873–2893. doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9
  15. Decaëns, T., Jiménez, J. J., Gioia, C., Measey, G. J., & Lavelle, P. (2006). The values of soil animals for conservation biology. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42(suppl. 1), S23–S38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.001
  16. Dominati, E., Patterson, M., & Mackay, A. (2010). A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1858–1868. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002
  17. European Commission. (2006). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. COM(2006)231 final. Brussels.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. COM(2011) 571 final. Brussels.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. (2014). LIFE and soil protection. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2779/64447
  20. European Environment Agency. (2007). Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010: Proposal for a first set of indicators to monitor progress in Europe. EEA Technical Report 11/2007. Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa, http://reports.eea.europa.eu/technical_report_2007_11/en/
  21. Faber, J. H., Creamer, R. E., Mulder, C., Römbke, J., Rutgers, M., Sousa, J. P., et al. (2013). The practicalities and pitfalls of establishing a policy-relevant and cost-effective soil biological monitoring scheme. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 9(2), 276–284. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1398
  22. Gardi, C., Montanarella, L., Arrouays, D., Bispo, A., Lemanceau, P., Jolivet, C., et al. (2009). Soil biodiversity monitoring in Europe: Ongoing activities and challenges. European Journal of Soil Science, 60(5), 807–819. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01177.x
  23. Hartemink, A. E. (2008). Soils are back on the global agenda. Soil Use and Management, 24(4), 327–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00187.x
  24. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2015). Soil quality—vocabulary. ISO 11074:2015. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  25. Jeffery, S., Gardi, C., Jones, A., Montanarella, L., Marmo, L., Miko, L., et al. (2010). European Atlas of Soil Biodiversity. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2788/94222
  26. Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J., Doran, J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F., & Schuman, G. E. (1997). Soil quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation (A Guest Editorial). Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61(1), 4. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010001x
  27. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Morvan, X., Saby, N. P. A., Arrouays, D., Le Bas, C., Jones, R. J. A., Verheijen, F. G. A., et al. (2008). Soil monitoring in Europe: A review of existing systems and requirements for harmonisation. Science of The Total Environment, 391(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.046
  29. Niemelä, J. (2000). Biodiversity monitoring for decision-making. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 37(December), 307–317.Google Scholar
  30. Orgiazzi, A., Panagos, P., Yigini, Y., Dunbar, M. B., Gardi, C., Montanarella, L., et al. (2016). A knowledge-based approach to estimating the magnitude and spatial patterns of potential threats to soil biodiversity. Science of The Total Environment, 545–546, 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.092
  31. Parisi, V., Menta, C., Gardi, C., Jacomini, C., & Mozzanica, E. (2005). Microarthropod communities as a tool to assess soil quality and biodiversity: A new approach in Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 105(1–2), 323–333. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.02.002
  32. Pascual, U., Termansen, M., Hedlund, K., Brussaard, L., Faber, J. H., Foudi, S., et al. (2015). On the value of soil biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 15, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.06.002
  33. Pulleman, M., Creamer, R., Hamer, U., Helder, J., Pelosi, C., Pérès, G., et al. (2012). Soil biodiversity, biological indicators and soil ecosystem services—An overview of European approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(5), 529–538. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.009
  34. Reis, F., Carvalho, F., Martins da Silva, P., Mendes, S., Santos, S. A. P., & Sousa, J. P. (2016). The use of a functional approach as surrogate of Collembola species richness in European perennial crops and forests. Ecological Indicators, 61, 676–682. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.019
  35. Römbke, J., Breure, A. M., Mulder, C., & Rutgers, M. (2005). Legislation and ecological quality assessment of soil: Implementation of ecological indication systems in Europe. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62(2), 201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.023
  36. Römbke, J., Gardi, C., Creamer, R., & Miko, L. (2016). Soil biodiversity data: Actual and potential use in European and national legislation. Applied Soil Ecology, 97, 125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.003
  37. Ruf, A., Beck, L., Dreher, P., Hund-Rinke, K., Römbke, J., & Spelda, J. (2003). A biological classification concept for the assessment of soil quality: “biological soil classification scheme” (BBSK). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 98(1–3), 263–271. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00086-0
  38. Ruiz, N., Jérôme, M., Léonide, C., Christine, R., Hommay, G., Etienne, I., et al. (2011). IBQS: A synthetic index of soil quality based on soil macro-invertebrate communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(10), 2032–2045. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.019
  39. Rutgers, M., Schouten, A. J., Bloem, J., van Eekeren, N., de Goede, R. G. M., Jagersop Akkerhuis, G. A. J. M., et al. (2009). Biological measurements in a nationwide soil monitoring network. European Journal of Soil Science, 60(5), 820–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01163.x
  40. Schaeffer, A., van den Brink, P. J., Heimbach, F., Hoy, S. P., de Jong, F. M. W., Römbke, J., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Guidance from the SETAC Europe Workshop: Semi-field methods for the environmental risk assessment of pesticides in soil (PERAS). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sousa, J. P., da Silva, P. M., Feld, C. K., de Bello, F., Feio, M. J., Grandin, U., et al. (2009). Web report comparing indicator systems targeting deviation from undisturbed areas and disturbance gradients. Retrieved from http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODE_Report_on_Indicators_of_Disturbance.pdf
  42. Stone, D., Blomkvist, P., Hendriksen, N. B., Bonkowski, M., Jørgensen, H. B., Carvalho, F., et al. (2016). A method of establishing a transect for biodiversity and ecosystem function monitoring across Europe. Applied Soil Ecology, 97, 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.017
  43. Stone, D., Ritz, K., Griffiths, B. G., Orgiazzi, A., & Creamer, R. E. (2016). Selection of biological indicators appropriate for European soil monitoring. Applied Soil Ecology, 97, 12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.005
  44. Turbé, A., De Toni, A., Benito, P., Lavelle, P., Lavelle, P., Ruiz, N., et al. (2010). Soil biodiversity: Functions, threats and tools for policy makers. Bio Intelligence Service, IRD, and NIOO, Report for European Commission (DG Environment). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/soil/pdf/biodiversity_report.pdf
  45. United Nations. (1992). Convention on biological diversity. Retrieved from http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
  46. United Nations. (1994). United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa. Retrieved from http://www.unccd.int/Lists/SiteDocumentLibrary/Publications/UNCCD_Convention_ENG.pdf
  47. United Nations. (2014). General Assembly Resolution 68/232. World Soil Day and International Year of Soils, A/RES/68/232 (20 December 2013). Retrieved from undocs.org/A/RES/68/232
  48. Vandewalle, M., de Bello, F., Berg, M. P., Bolger, T., Dolédec, S., Dubs, F., et al. (2010). Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and organisms. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(10), 2921–2947. doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9798-9
  49. Velasquez, E., Lavelle, P., & Andrade, M. (2007). GISQ, a multifunctional indicator of soil quality. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39(12), 3066–3080. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.06.013
  50. Wall, D. H., Nielsen, U. N., & Six, J. (2015). Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature, 1–8. doi: 10.1038/nature15744
  51. Wurst, S., De Deyn, G. B., & Orwin, K. (2012). Soil Biodiversity and Functions. In D. H. Wall, R. D. Bardgett, V. Behan-Pelletier, J. E. Herrick, T. H. Jones, K. Ritz, et al. (Eds.), Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services (pp. 28–44). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Mendes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anabela Marisa Azul
    • 2
  • Paula Castro
    • 1
  • Jörg Römbke
    • 3
  • José Paulo Sousa
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life SciencesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Center for Neuroscience and Cell BiologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbHFlörsheimGermany

Personalised recommendations