Advertisement

Adaptive Multi-level Workflow Scheduling with Uncertain Task Estimates

  • Tomasz Dziok
  • Kamil Figiela
  • Maciej MalawskiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9574)

Abstract

Scheduling of scientific workflows in IaaS clouds with pay-per-use pricing model and multiple types of virtual machines is an important challenge. Most static scheduling algorithms assume that the estimates of task runtimes are known in advance, while in reality the actual runtime may vary. To address this problem, we propose an adaptive scheduling algorithm for deadline constrained workflows consisting of multiple levels. The algorithm produces a global approximate plan for the whole workflow in a first phase, and a local detailed schedule for the current level of the workflow. By applying this procedure iteratively after each level completes, the algorithm is able to adjust to the runtime variation. For each phase we propose optimization models that are solved using Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) method. The preliminary simulation results using data from Amazon infrastructure, and both synthetic and Montage workflows, show that the adaptive approach has advantages over a static one.

Keywords

Cloud Workflow Scheduling Optimization Adaptive algorithm 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdelzaher, T., Diao, Y., Hellerstein, J.L., Lu, C., Zhu, X.: Introduction to control theory and its application to computing systems. In: Liu, Z., Xia, C.H. (eds.) Performance Modeling and Engineering, pp. 185–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amazon: AWS pricing (2015). http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
  3. 3.
    Bittencourt, L.F., Madeira, E.R.M.: Hcoc: A cost optimization algorithm for workflow scheduling in hybrid clouds. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 2(3), 207–227 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    den Bossche, R.V., Vanmechelen, K., Broeckhove, J.: Online cost-efficient scheduling of deadline-constrained workloads on hybrid clouds. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(4), 973–985 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chirkin, A.M., Belloum, A.S.Z., Kovalchuk, S.V., Makkes, M.X.: Execution time estimation for workflow scheduling. In: 2014 9th Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, pp. 1–10. IEEE, November 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CloudHarmony: What is ECU? CPU benchmarking in Cloud (2010). http://blog.cloudharmony.com/2010/05/what-is-ecu-cpu-benchmarking-in-cloud.html
  7. 7.
    Deelman, E., et al.: Pegasus, a workflow management system for science automation. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 46, 17–35 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dziok, T.: Repository with optimization models (2015). https://bitbucket.org/tdziok/mgr-cloudplanner
  9. 9.
    Fard, H.M., Prodan, R., Fahringer, T.: A truthful dynamic workflow scheduling mechanism for commercial multicloud environments. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24(6), 1203–1212 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Figiela, K., Malawski, M.: Modeling, optimization and performance evaluation of scientific workflows in clouds. In: 2014 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Big Data and Cloud Computing, p. 280. IEEE, December 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forrest, J.: Cbc (coin-or branch and cut) open-source mixed integer programmingsolver (2012). https://projects.coin-or.org/Cbc
  12. 12.
    Genez, T.A.L., Bittencourt, L.F., Madeira, E.R.M.: Using time discretization to schedule scientific workflows in multiple cloud providers. In: 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Cloud Computing, pp. 123–130. IEEE, June 2013Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Juve, G., Chervenak, A., Deelman, E., Bharathi, S., Mehta, G., Vahi, K.: Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(3), 682–692 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malawski, M., Figiela, K., Bubak, M., Deelman, E., Nabrzyski, J.: Scheduling Multilevel Deadline-Constrained Scientific Workflows on Clouds Based on Cost Optimization. Scientific Programming, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malawski, M., Figiela, K., Nabrzyski, J.: Cost minimization for computational applications on hybrid cloud infrastructures. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1786–1794 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malawski, M., Juve, G., Deelman, E., Nabrzyski, J.: Algorithms for cost and deadline-constrained provisioning for scientific workflow ensembles in IaaS clouds. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 48, 1–18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mao, M., Humphrey, M.: Auto-scaling to minimize cost and meet application deadlines in cloud workflows. In: SC 2011. SC 2011, ACM, Seattle, Washington (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pietri, I., Juve, G., Deelman, E., Sakellariou, R.: A performance model to estimate execution time of scientific workflows on the cloud. In: Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, pp. 11–19. WORKS 2014, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Steglich, M.: CMPL (Coin mathematical programming language) (2015). https://projects.coin-or.org/Cmpl

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations