The Benefits and Risks of Feminist Practice as Early Career Scholars in Social Psychology

Chapter

Abstract

Feminist theory has informed how psychologists and other social scientists think about doing science, in terms of epistemology and methodology. While there are many sources for understanding how feminist theory can inform theory and methods in psychological science, there are few reflections on what it looks like “on the ground” to try to incorporate feminist approaches into one’s professional academic life. This chapter examines the real world implications of feminist practices in the context of conducting research, mentoring, and working on institutional change. Drawing on examples from our own experiences, we discuss practical decisions informed by feminist commitments as well as some of their consequences. We also argue that feminist practices are sometimes (though not always) at odds with professional norms and expectations, particularly for early career scholars, who face enormous pressures to publish quickly and prolifically. Throughout, we offer specific suggestions for individual scholars, as well as the field, in order to make our science both more rigorous and inclusive, and our careers as feminist scholars more successful.

Keywords

Feminism Research methods Mentoring Institutional change Professional development 

References

  1. Abrams, D. (2014). Reality check: Rigor, relevance, and the value of social psychological research. Forward, 1-6.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. (2008). Conference report: International lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender psychology Summer Institute. Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 4(3), 201–204.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Ansara, Y. G., & Hegarty, P. (2011). Cisgenderism in psychology: Pathologizing and misgendering children from 1999 to 2008. Psychology and Sexuality, 3, 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Betz, D. E., Ramsey, L. R., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). Perceiving race relevance in everyday events: Target race matters, perceiver race does not. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16, 699–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird, S., Litt, J. S., & Wang, Y. (2004). Creating status of women reports: Institutional housekeeping as “women’s work”. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 194–206.Google Scholar
  7. Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, L. (1989). New voices/new visions: Toward a lesbian/gay paradigm for psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Case, K. (2009). A workshop just for you: Early career journeys with social policy. Forward, 239, 19–20.Google Scholar
  10. Chhuon, V., & Hudley, C. (2010). Asian American ethnic options: How Cambodian students negotiate ethnic identities in a U.S. Urban School. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(4), 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole, E. R., & Zucker, A. N. (2007). Black and white women’s perspectives on femininity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(1), 1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cortina, L. M., Curtin, N., & Stewart, A. J. (2012). Where is social structure in personality research? A feminist analysis of publication trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(3), 259–273.Google Scholar
  14. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 1241–1299.Google Scholar
  15. Curtin, N., & Eaton, A. A. (2015, May), Gender beyond difference: An interactive discussion on the state of gender research in the psychological sciences. Chairs in an invited symposium conducted at the national conference for the American Psychological Association (APA) in New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. Curtin, N., Hegarty, P., & Stewart, A. J. (2012). Fostering research collaborations in LGBT psychology: An introduction to the special issue. Psychology & Sexuality, 3, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curtin, N., Stewart, A. J., & Ostrove, J. M. (2013). Fostering academic self-concept advisor support and sense of belonging among international and domestic graduate students. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 108–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diamond, L. M., Pardo, S. T., & Butterworth, M. R. (2011). Transgender experience and identity. In Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 629–647). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Espinoza, O. (2007). Solving the equity-equality conceptual dilemma: A new model for analysis of the educational process. Educational Research, 49, 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fine, M. (1999). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Freedman, J. (2014). Reclaiming the feminist vision: Consciousness-raising and small group practice. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  22. Gonzales, R. G., & Chavez, L. R. (2012). “Awakening to a nightmare”: Abjectivity and illegality in the lives of undocumented 1.5-generation Latino Immigrants in the United States. Current Anthropology, 53(3), 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant, A. & Sandberg, S. (2015, February 6). Madam C.E.O., get me a coffee. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.comGoogle Scholar
  24. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan, (Eds.) Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Grice, H.P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan, (Eds.) Syntax and semantics (Vol. 9, pp. 113-127). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Griffin, K. A., Bennett, J. C., & Harris, J. (2013). Marginalizing merit? Gender differences in Black faculty D/discourses on tenure, advancement, and professional success. Review of Higher Education, 36, 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guthrie, R. V. (2002). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  28. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Haupert, M., Murphy, M. C., & Smith, E. R. (2015). A question of trust: how context and wording of gender questions affects perceptions of researcher. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar
  30. Hegarty, P., & Buechel, C. (2006). Androcentric reporting of gender differences in APA Journals: 1965-2004. Review of General Psychology, 10, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.Google Scholar
  33. King, K. R. (2003). Do you see what I see? Effects of group consciousness on African American women’s attributions to prejudice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, S. J. (1994). Behind the model-minority stereotype: Voices of high- and low-achieving Asian American students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 25(4), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lott, B., & Bullock, H. E. (2007). Psychology and economic injustice: Personal, professional, and political intersections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maguire, P. (2001). Uneven ground: Feminisms and action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 60–70). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Meier, S. C., & Labuski, C. M. (2013). The demographics of the transgender population. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 289–331). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5512-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson, G. (2013). Community psychology and transformative policy change in the neo-liberal era. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3-4), 211–223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Newton, N. (2015). The second Institute for Academic Feminist Psychologists. The Feminist Psychologist, 42, 29–30.Google Scholar
  40. Olkin, R., & Pledger, C. (2003). Can disability studies and psychology join hands? American Psychologist, 58(4), 296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ostrove, J. M., Stewart, A. J., & Curtin, N. L. (2011). Social class and belonging: Implications for graduate students’ career aspirations. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(6), 748–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parlee, M. B. (1975). Psychology. Signs, 1(1), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pew Research Center. (August 22, 2012). The lost decade of the middle class. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/08/22/the-lost-decade-of-the-middle-class/
  44. Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5-6), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Quinlan, K. M. (1999). Enhancing mentoring and networking of junior academic women: What, why, and how? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramsey, L. R., & Hoyt, T. (2015). The object of desire: How being objectified creates sexual pressure for women in heterosexual relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ritchie, A., & Barker, M. (2006). ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 584–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roberts, A., Cash, T. F., Feingold, A., & Johnson, B. T. (2006). Are black-white differences in females' body dissatisfaction decreasing? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(6), 1121–1131.Google Scholar
  49. Rushing, S., Levine, M., & Winterrowd, E. (2015, June). Successful interventions with demonstrated impacts. Symposium conducted at the ADVANCE/GSE Program Workshop, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  50. Sabik, N. J., Cole, E. R., & Ward, L. M. (2010). Are all minority women equally buffered from negative body image? Intra‐ethnic moderators of the buffering hypothesis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 139–151.Google Scholar
  51. Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11(5), 621–641.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods and the logic of communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5-6), 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stern, P. C. (2011). Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 303–314. doi:10.1037/a0023235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Suyemoto, K. L. (2002). Redefining “Asian American” identity: Reflections on differentiating ethnic and racial identities for Asian American individuals and communities. In L. Zhan (Ed.), Asian Americans: Vulnerable populations, model interventions, and clarifying agendas (pp. 195–231). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  57. Syed, M. (2010). Disciplinarity and methodology in intersectionality theory and research. American Psychologist, 65(1), 61–62. doi:10.1037/a0017495.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tate, C. C., Ledbetter, J. N., & Youssef, C. P. (2013). A two-question method for assessing gender categories in the social and medical sciences. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 767–776.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tran, L. T., & Walter, P. G. (2010). National unity and ethnic identity in a Vietnamese university. Comparative Education Review, 54(4), 483–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner, C. S. V. (2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 74–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Anders, S. M. (2012). The first feminist sex research reception at the International Academy of Sex Research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(2), 323–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1–37.Google Scholar
  63. Wingfield, A. H. (2010). Are some emotions marked ‘whites only’? Racialized feeling rules in professional workplaces. Social Problems, 57(2), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wong, F., & Halgin, R. (2006). The model minority: Bane or blessing for Asian Americans? Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 34(1), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clark UniversityWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.Bridgewater State UniversityBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations