Efficient Influence Maximization in Weighted Independent Cascade Model

  • Yaxuan WangEmail author
  • Hongzhi Wang
  • Jianzhong Li
  • Hong Gao
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9643)


Influence maximization (IM) problem which aims to find the most influential seed set in a social network plays an important role in viral marketing. However, previous solutions pay all attention to the structure of network, which causes trouble in real-word applications.

D. Kempe et al. [8] presented that a non-negative weight can be attached to each node to extend the applicability of traditional models. Although this idea is much applicable in practice, there is little research based on this opinion. Thus, we develop substantial study about this issue. We extend the Independent Cascade (IC) model and present Weighted IC (WIC) model. The IM problem in WIC model is NP-hard. To solve this problem, we present a basic greedy algorithm and Weight Reset (WR) algorithm. Moreover, we propose Bounded WR (BWR) algorithm, a Fully Polynomial-Time Approximation Scheme (FPTAS).

Experimentally, WIC model outperforms IC model in nearly \(90\,\%\) in weighted IM problem. Moreover, BWR achieves excellent approximation and efficiency which is faster than greedy algorithm more than four orders of magnitude. Especially, BWR can handle huge networks with millions of nodes in several tens of seconds while keeping high accuracy. This result demonstrates the effectiveness and efficiency of BWR.


Greedy Algorithm Node Selection Giant Component Influence Maximization Independent Cascade 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This paper was supported by NGFR 973 grant 2012CB316200, NSFC grant U1509216,61472099,61133002 and National Sci-Tech Support Plan 2015BAH10F01.


  1. 1.
    Brin, S., Page, L.: Reprint of: the anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput. Netw. 56(18), 3825–3833 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, W., Wang, C., Wang, Y.: Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks. In: KDD, pp. 1029–1038. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, W., Wang, Y., Yang, S.: Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In: ACM SIGKDD, pp. 199–208. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Domingos, P., Richardson, M.: Mining the network value of customers. In: KDD, pp. 57–66. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goyal, A., Lu, W., Lakshmanan, L.V.: Celf++: optimizing the greedy algorithm for influence maximization in social networks. In: WWW, pp. 47–48. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hochba, D.S.: Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems. ACM SIGACT News 28(2), 40–52 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cai, J.L.Z., Yan, M., Li, Y.: Using crowdsourced data in location-based social networks to explore influence maximization. In: The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM 2016) (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: KDD, pp. 137–146. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leskovec, J.: Stanford large network dataset collection.
  10. 10.
    Leskovec, J., Krause, A., Guestrin, C., Faloutsos, C., VanBriesen, J., Glance, N.: Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In: ACM SIGKDD, pp. 420–429. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han, M., Yan, M., Cai, Z., Li, Y.: An exploration of broader influence maximization in timeliness networks with opportunistic selection. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. (2016, in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nail, J.: The consumer advertising backlash, Forrester Research and Intelliseek Market Research Report, 137, May 2004Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nemhauser, G.L., Wolsey, L.A., Fisher, M.L.: An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions–I. Math. Program. 14(1), 265–294 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Newman, M.E.: The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98(2), 404–409 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siegmund-Schultze, R.: Richard von mises (1883–1953): a pioneer of applied mathematics in four countries. Newslett. Eur. Math. Soc. 73, 31–34 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tang, Y., Xiao, X., Shi, Y.: Influence maximization: near-optimal time complexity meets practical efficiency. In: SIGMOD, pp. 75–86. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shi, T., Wan, J., Cheng, S., Cai, Z., Li, Y., Li, J.: Time-bounded positive influence in social networks. In: International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, Y., Cong, G., Song, G., Xie, K.: Community-based greedy algorithm for mining top-k influential nodes in mobile social networks. In: ACM SIGKDD, pp. 1039–1048. ACM (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaxuan Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hongzhi Wang
    • 1
  • Jianzhong Li
    • 1
  • Hong Gao
    • 1
  1. 1.Harbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations