The Micro-Cosmos of German Cities: New Insights into the Supply of and Demand for Urban Amenities

Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


The value of location, arguably the most important determinant of real estate prices, is a composite of a broad range of characteristics such as access to labor markets, natural amenities like parks and waterfronts, urban amenities like restaurants and cultural facilities and the socio-economic characteristics of the resident population. To consumers searching for new living space, the cost of collecting relevant information on neighborhoods they are not familiar with is high. For developers, real estate agents and policy makers, the changing nature of consumer preferences for the various types of amenities are typically hard to observe, creating uncertainty as to where and how to best provide and promote desirable living space. The results are frictions like higher moving costs and reduced mobility, imperfect product differentiation and welfare losses. A new application, POTENTIALSPACES, aims at reducing these frictions by developing (a) micro-geographic indices that capture the endowment with such amenities covering the whole of Germany, (b) a web interface to search for a preferred combination of amenities, and (c) a real-time monitoring system of the demand for amenities. Using POTENTIALSPACES as an example, this article introduces the theoretical underpinnings and practical applications of “big data” in the realm of real estate.


Urban amenities Micro-geographic data Potentialspaces 


  1. Ahlfeldt GM (2011) If Alonso was right: modeling accessibility and explaining the residential land gradient. J Reg Sci 51(2):318–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlfeldt GM, Wendland N (2013) How polycentric is a monocentric city? Centers, spillovers and hysteresis. J Econ Geogr 13(1):53–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahlfeldt GM, Maennig W, Oelschlaeger M (2014) Measuring and quantifying lifestyles and their impact on public choices: the case of professional football in Munich. J Econ Soc Meas 39(1):59–86Google Scholar
  4. Ahlfeldt GM, Redding SJ, Sturm DM, Wolf N (2015) The economics of density: evidence from the Berlin wall. Econometrica 83(6):2127–2189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alonso W (1964) Location and land use: toward a general theory of land rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brueckner JK, Thisse J-F, Zenou Y (1999) Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. Eur Econ Rev 43(1):91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuberes D, Roberts J (2014) Where do the urban poor live? Evidence for the United Kingdom. NARSC conference paperGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujita M, Ogawa H (1982) Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations. Reg Sci Urban Econ 12(2):161–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaeser EL, Kolko J, Saiz A (2001) Consumer city. J Econ Geogr 1(1):27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris CD (1954) The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 44(4):315–348Google Scholar
  11. Lucas RE Jr, Rossi-Hansberg E (2002) On the internal structure of cities. Econometrica 70(4):1445–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mills ES (1967) An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. Am Econ Rev 57(2):197–210Google Scholar
  13. Muth RF (1969) Cities and housing: the spatial pattern of urban residential land use. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Schiff N (2015) Cities and product variety: evidence from restaurants. J Econ Geogr 15(6):1085–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sinus-Sociovision (Producer) (2007) Wo die milieus wohnen—mosaic milieus. Accessed 16 Feb 2009

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.Touro College BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations