Advertisement

Upper Extremity Amputation

  • Nikola Babovic
  • Brian T. Carlsen
Chapter

Abstract

Although significantly less common than vascular insufficiency in the lower extremities, heart, or brain, processes leading to inadequate vascular flow in the upper extremity carry significant morbidity. Our hands are our highly technical and extremely skilled terminal devices and arguably what make us uniquely human. Therefore when faced with situations of hand loss, every attempt should be made to preserve as much length and function as possible. Amputation is a procedure of last resort and is indicated only after limb salvage options have failed. The functional consequence of any particular amputation is the primary. Advances in reconstructive surgery and prosthetic devices hold hope and promise improved function for the upper limb amputee.

Keywords

Hand loss Hand amputation Upper limb loss Partial hand amputation Limb salvage Replantation Prosthetics Targeted reinnervation Targeted muscle reinnervation 

References

  1. 1.
    Fuchs JC. The pathology of upper-extremity arterial disease. Hand Clin. 1993;9(1):1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Gils W et al. Sensibility of the stump in adults with an acquired major upper extremity amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2179–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlsson IK, Dahlin LB. Self-reported cold sensitivity in patients with traumatic hand injuries or hand-arm vibration syndrome: an eight year follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlsson IK, Rosen B, Dahlin LB. Self-reported cold sensitivity in normal subjects and in patients with traumatic hand injuries or hand-arm vibration syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirk NT. Amputations, a monograph volume III, Lewis’ practice of surgery. Hagerstown: W. F. Prior Co., Inc; 1943.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pederson WC. Replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(3):823–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiu HY, Chen MT. Revascularization of digits after thirty-three hours of warm ischemia time: a case report. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9A(1):63–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wei FC et al. Three successful digital replantations in a patient after 84, 86, and 94 hours of cold ischemia time. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82(2):346–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones NF, Gupta R. Postoperative monitoring of pediatric toe-to-hand transfers with differential pulse oximetry. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;26(3):525–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giladi AM et al. Measuring outcomes and determining long-term disability after revision amputation for treatment of traumatic finger and thumb amputation injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(5):746e–55e.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chim H et al. Challenges in replantation of complex amputations. Semin Plast Surg. 2013;27(4):182–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yabe T et al. Treatment of fingertip amputation: comparison of results between microsurgical replantation and pocket principle. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28(4):221–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang K et al. A systematic review of outcomes of revision amputation treatment for fingertip amputations. Hand (N Y). 2013;8(2):139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alper N, Sood A, Granick MS. Composite graft repair for distal fingertip amputation. Eplasty. 2013;13:ic32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moran SL, Berger RA. Biomechanics and hand trauma: what you need. Hand Clin. 2003;19(1):17–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin PY et al. A systematic review of outcomes of toe-to-thumb transfers for isolated traumatic thumb amputation. Hand (N Y). 2011;6(3):235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agarwal JP et al. Selected outcomes of thumb replantation after isolated thumb amputation injury. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2010;35(9):1485–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carroll RE. Transposition of the index finger to replace the middle finger. Clin Orthop. 1959;15:27–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Posner MA. Ray transposition for central digital loss. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1979;4(3):242–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carlsen BT, Prigge P, Peterson J. Upper extremity limb loss: functional restoration from prosthesis and targeted reinnervation to transplantation. J Hand Ther. 2014;27(2):106–13. quiz 114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Louis DS, Hunter LY, Keating TM. Painful neuromas in long below-elbow amputees. Arch Surg. 1980;115(6):742–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pasquina PF et al. Advances in amputee care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(3 Suppl 1):S34–43. quiz S44–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tager G, Nast-Kolb D. Amputation and prosthesis management of the upper extremity. Unfallchirurg. 2000;103(11):977–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cayci C, Carlsen BT, Saint-Cyr M. Optimizing functional and aesthetic outcomes of upper limb soft tissue reconstruction. Hand Clin. 2014;30(2):225–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burger H et al. Validation of the orthotics and prosthetics user survey upper extremity functional status module in people with unilateral upper limb amputation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(5):393–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baumgartner RF. Upper extremity amputation and prosthetics. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(4):7–10.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meier 3rd RH, Melton D. Ideal functional outcomes for amputation levels. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(1):199–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kleeman LT, Shafritz AB. The Krukenberg procedure. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2013;38(1):173–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krukenberg H. Uber plastische umvertung von armamputationsstumpfen. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke; 1917.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(12):977–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dillingham TR et al. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: a long-term outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(8):563–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wright TW, Hagen AD, Wood MB. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;20(4):619–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kuiken TA et al. The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004;28(3):245–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dumanian GA et al. Targeted reinnervation for transhumeral amputees: current surgical technique and update on results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(3):863–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hijjawi JB et al. Improved myoelectric prosthesis control accomplished using multiple nerve transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(7):1573–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Miller LA et al. Improved myoelectric prosthesis control using targeted reinnervation surgery: a case series. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008;16(1):46–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Agnew SP et al. Limb transplantation and targeted reinnervation: a practical comparison. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28(1):63–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikola Babovic
    • 1
  • Brian T. Carlsen
    • 2
  1. 1.Orthopaedic SurgeryAllegheny Health NetworkPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Orthopedic and Plastic SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations