Advertisement

Service User Involvement and Perspectives

  • Marta Ferraz
Chapter
Part of the Principles of Specialty Nursing book series (PSN)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the highly important issue of mental health service user involvement in formal mental healthcare services and considers service user perspectives of mental healthcare in Europe. From the 1970s onward, European nations have seen a veritable “wave” of mental health service user groups and organizations as they sought to protect their rights from what they often experienced as a politically oppressive system. In this decade, most European countries have national (and/or local) service user organizations, and federal level mental health policies have been modernized to reflect and make room for service user perspectives. Accordingly, after briefly introducing the issue, this chapter explores the outcomes associated with involving service users in mental health care—such as they are. The five key attributes of service user involvement are explored, followed by identifying and discussing the challenges such developments present. The chapter concludes by linking mental health “recovery” with service user involvement and offers some recommendations for practice and policy.

References

  1. Bee P, Price O, Baker J, Lovell K (2015) Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to user-led care planning. Br J Psychiatry 207(2):104–114.  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.152447 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bental R, HG Publishing (2003) “What was that you said again?” - a new look at psychosis, The Human Givens Institute, Chalvington. Retrieved from: http://www.hgi.org.uk/archive/newlook-psychosis.htm#.VyZqQmODBSU on 20 April 2016
  3. Gosling J (2010) The ethos of involvement as the route to recovery. In: Weinstein J (ed) Mental health, service user involvement and recovery. Jessica Kingsley, Philadelphia, pp 201–215Google Scholar
  4. Kemp P (2010) Introduction to mental health service user involvement. In: Weinstein J (ed) Mental health, service user involvement and recovery. Jessica Kingsley, Philadelphia, pp 15–29Google Scholar
  5. Lewis L (2014) User involvement in mental health services: a case of power over discourse. Sociol Res Online 19(1.) Retrieved from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk.html
  6. Linhorst D (2006) Empowering people with severe mental illness: a practical guide. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  7. Mancini AD (2008) Self-determination theory: a framework for the recovery paradigm. Adv Psychiatr Treat 14(5):358–365.  https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.107.004036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Millar S, Chambers M, Giles M (2016) Service user involvement in mental health care: an evolutionary concept analysis. Health Expect 19(2):209–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Roe D, Davidson L (2005) Destinations and detours of the users’ movement. J Ment Health 14(5):429–433.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08893670500270734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Slade M, Davidson L (2011) Recovery as an integrative paradigm in mental health. In: Thornicroft G, Szmukler G, Mueser KT, Drake RE (eds) Oxford textbook of community mental health. Oxford University Press, London, pp 26–33Google Scholar
  11. Tait L, Lester H (2005) Encouraging user involvement in mental health services. Adv Psychiatr Treat 11(3):168–175.  https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.11.3.168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thornicroft G, Tansella M (2006) Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 14(1):1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. World Health Organization (2013) Mental health action plan 2013–2020. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. World Health Organization (2015) The European mental health action plan 2013–2020. WHO - Regional Office for Europe, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  15. Weinstein J (2010) Conclusion: the way forward for service user involvement and recovery. In: Weinstein J (ed) Mental health, service user involvement and recovery. Jessica Kingsley, Philadelphia, pp 201–215Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Ferraz
    • 1
  1. 1.Coordinator of the Advisory Commission for User and Caregiver Participation, National Mental Health Programme, DGS, Director of the Oeiras Psychosocial Rehabilitation UnitARIAMiraPortugal

Personalised recommendations