Working It Out: Balancing Work and Care After the Birth of a First Child

  • Wendy Boyd
  • Prudence M. Millear
  • Karen L. Thorpe
  • Sue Walker


Women in contemporary western economies have more options and more pressures to combine work with family responsibilities in the early years of motherhood. This chapter examines how these options are exercised as women make decisions about re-entry to the workforce following the birth of their first child. We present an analysis of data from a cohort of Australian women. The data were tracked longitudinally from pregnancy until their first child was 18 months old to identify patterns of approach and salient factors of influence as they negotiate the dual challenges of re-entry to the workforce and finding acceptable childcare. Mothers’ work intentions were mapped against actual return behaviour with return assessed at 6, 12 and 18 months after the birth of their child. Early returns were associated with jobs that offered less provision for maternity leave and availability of familiar trustworthy childcare. All mothers had high satisfaction levels with motherhood and their mothering role. However, working and non-working mothers rated the costs and benefits of maternal employment differently. Working mothers were more likely to see maternal employment as increasingly beneficial and less costly across the first 18 months of their child’s life. Each generation of parents faces different challenges in finding the balance between work and care. In this contemporary sample of mothers, the majority returned to work and adapted to the new reality of work options, which were somewhat different from their pre-parenthood ideals.


First-time mothers Attitudes to maternal employment Maternal satisfaction 


  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Australian social trends data: Work. Retrieved from
  2. Baxter, J. (2014). Child care participation and maternal employment trends in Australia. Retrieved from
  3. Biddulph, S. (2005). Raising babies. Should under 3s go to nursery? London: Harper Thorsons.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, W. (2014). Parents’ choices of child care in Australia. NZ Research in Early Childhood Education, 17, 51–69.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, W., Walker, S., & Thorpe, K. (2013). Choosing work and choosing care: Four Australian women negotiating return to paid work in the first year of motherhood. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 14(2), 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, Y. E. (2013). The Relation between mothers’ attitudes toward maternal employment and social competence of 36-month-olds: The roles of maternal psychological well-being and sensitivity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(7), 987–999. doi: 10.1007/s10826-012-9660-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlesworth, S., & Chelmers, J. (2005). Studies in ‘quality’ part-time employment. Labour & Industry, 15(3), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clausen, L. (2006, March 13). Who’s minding the kids? Time Magazine, 13th March, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Coffey, A. (2004). Reconceptualising social policy. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10 item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 150(6), 782–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig, L. (2007). Contemporary motherhood: The impact of children on adult time. Aldershop, UK: Burlington.Google Scholar
  12. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work-family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72, 1344–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeMeis, D. K., Hock, E., & McBride, S. L. (1986). The balance of employment and motherhood: Longitudinal study of mothers’ feelings about separation from their first-born infants. Developmental Psychology, 22(5), 627–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenberger, E., Goldberg, W. A., Crawford, T. J., & Granger, J. (1988). Beliefs about the consequences of maternal employment for children. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 35–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00926.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, N. (2008). Women’s reflections on choosing quality long day care in a regional community. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(3), 42–49.Google Scholar
  16. Hock, E., & DeMeis, D. K. (1990). Depression in mothers of infants: The role of maternal employment. Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmes, E. K., Erickson, J. J., & Hill, E. J. (2012). Doing what she thinks is best: Maternal psychological well-being and attaining desired work situations. Human Relations, 65(4), 501–522. doi: 10.1177/0018726711431351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huerta, M. C, Adema, W., Baxter, J., Corak, M., Deding, M., Gray, M., Han, W., & Waldfogel, J. (2011). Early maternal employment and child development in five OECD countries. Retrieved from
  19. Killien, M. G. (2005). The role of social support in facilitating postpartum women’s return to employment. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 34(5), 639–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krapf, S. (2009). Childcare and family ideology in Sweden. Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.Google Scholar
  21. Manne, A. (2005). Motherhood. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting strong II. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). Babies and bosses. Reconciling work and family life. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  24. Pocock, B. (2005). Work/care regimes: Institutions, culture and behaviour and the Australian case. Gender, Work & Organization, 12(1), 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pungello, E. P., & Kurtz- Costes, B. (2000). Working women’s selection of care for their infants: A prospective study. Family Relations, 49, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thorpe, K., Cloney, D., & Tayler, C. (2010). Rethinking early childhood education and care: Implications for research and evaluation. In Encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy Boyd
    • 1
  • Prudence M. Millear
    • 2
  • Karen L. Thorpe
    • 3
  • Sue Walker
    • 4
  1. 1.School of EducationSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  2. 2.School of Social SciencesUniversity of the Sunshine CoastMaroochydore DCAustralia
  3. 3.School of Psychology and CounsellingQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia
  4. 4.School of Early ChildhoodQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia

Personalised recommendations