Advertisement

Supporting Users in Setting Effective Goals in Activity Tracking

  • Katja Herrmanny
  • Jürgen Ziegler
  • Aysegül Dogangün
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9638)

Abstract

In this paper we present the development of the pedometer app Move My Day which implements goal setting as its main persuasive design principle. Manual goal input as well as two strategies to support users in setting realistic goals, namely reference routes and personal goal recommendation, were implemented. The proposed algorithm for adaptive personal goal recommendation is designed in a way that it recommends short-term goals considering motivational aspects and gradually raises goals in the long term to meet physical activity recommendations. In a 12 week field study, we investigated the potentials of the two support strategies. Results indicate that about half of the users appreciate goal setting support and that especially personal goal recommendation seems to have potential to support users in setting effective physical activity goals.

Keywords

Persuasive technology Behavior change support system Activity tracking Goal setting Personalization Pedometer Physical activity 

References

  1. 1.
    Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 57(9), 705–717 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saini, P., Lacroix, J.: Self-setting of physical activity goals and effects on perceived difficulty, importance and competence. In: 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (Persuasive), pp. 33–39. ACM Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hawkins, R.P., Kreuter, M., Resnicow, K., Fishbein, M., Dijkstra, A.: Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ. Res. 23(3), 454–466 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    King, A.C., Ahn, D.K., Oliveira, B.M., Atienza, A.A., Castro, C.M., Gardner, C.D.: Promoting physical activity through hand-held computer technology. Am. J. Prev. Med. 34(2), 138–142 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    op den Akker, H., Jones, V.M., Hermens, H.J.: Tailoring real-time physical activity coaching systems: a literature survey and model. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 24(5), 351–392 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    op den Akker, H., Klaassen, R., op den Akker, R., Jones, V.M.; Hermens, H.J.: Opportunities for smart & tailored activity coaching. In: 26th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), pp. 546–547. IEEE Press (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., Landay, J.A.: Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 457–466. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, J.J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., Strub, H.B.: Fish’n’Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In: Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006. LNCS, vol. 4206, pp. 261–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Consolvo, S., Klasnja, P., McDonald, D.W., Avrahami, D., Froehlich, J., LeGrand, L., Libby, R., Mosher, K., Landay, J.A.: Flowers or a robot army? In: 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp), pp. 54–63. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bickmore, T.W., Caruso, L., Clough-Gorr, K.: Acceptance and usability of a relational agent interface by urban older adults. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts, pp. 1212–1215. ACM Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burns, P., Lueg, C., Berkovsky, S.: Activmon: Encouraging physical activity through ambient social awareness. In: CHI 2012 Extended Abstracts, pp. 2363–2368. ACM Press, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    King, A.C., Hekler, E.B., Grieco, L.A., Winter, S.J., Sheats, J.L., Buman, M.P., et al.: Harnessing different motivational frames via mobile phones to promote daily physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior in aging adults. PLoS ONE 8(4), e62613 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bielik, P.: Personalized training plan recommendation and activity tracking for a healthier lifestyle. Bull. ACM Slovakia 3(4), 39–40 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buttussi, F., Chittaro, L.: MOPET: A context-aware and user-adaptive wearable system for fitness training. Wearable Comput. Artif. Intell. Healthc. Appl. 42(2), 153–163 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bravata, D.M., Smith-Spangler, C., Sundaram, V., Gienger, A.L., Lin, N., Lewis, R., Stave, C.D., Olkin, I., Sirard, J.R.: Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA 298(19), 2296–2304 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kang, M., Marshall, S.J., Barreira, T.V., Lee, J.O.: Effect of pedometer-based physical activity interventions: A meta-analysis. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 80(3), 648–655 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    World Health Organization: Global recommendations on physical activity for health (2010). http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599979_eng.pdf?ua=1
  18. 18.
    Choi, B.C.K., Pak, A.W.P., Choi, J.C.L.: Daily step goal of 10,000 steps: A literature review. Clin. Invest. Med. 30(3), 6 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tudor-Locke, C., Johnson, W.D., Katzmarzyk, P.T.: Accelerometer-determined steps per day in US adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 41(7), 1384–1391 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katja Herrmanny
    • 1
  • Jürgen Ziegler
    • 1
  • Aysegül Dogangün
    • 1
  1. 1.Personal Analytics, Interactive Systems Research GroupUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations