Towards an Agent-Based Model of Passenger Transportation

  • Banafsheh HajinasabEmail author
  • Paul Davidsson
  • Jan A. Persson
  • Johan Holmgren
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9568)


An agent-based simulation model for supporting the decision making in urban transport planning is presented. The model can be used to investigate how different transport infrastructure investments and policy instruments will affect the travel choices of passengers. We identified four main categories of factors influencing the choice of travel: cost, time, convenience, and social norm. However, travelers value these factors differently depending on their individual characteristics, such as age, income, work flexibility and environmental engagement, as well as on external factors, such as the weather. Moreover, instead of modeling the transport system explicitly, online web services are used to generate travel options. The model can support transport planners by providing estimations of modal share, as well as economical and environmental consequences. As a first step towards validation of the model, we have conducted a simple case study of three scenarios where we analyze the effects of changes to the public transport fares on commuters’ travel choices in the Malmö-Lund region in Sweden.


Multi-agent based simulation Traveler behavior modeling Passenger transport Impact assessment Web services 



We wish to thank K2– The Swedish National Knowledge Centre for Public Transport for partially funding this research, and the National ITS Postgraduate.


  1. 1.
    Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F.: Policy implications and analysis of the determinants of travel mode choice: an application of choice experiments to metropolitan Costa Rica. Environ. Dev. Econ. 8(04), 603–619 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    An, S., Cui, J.X., Li, L.Y.: Agent-based approach to model commuter behaviour’s day-to-day dynamics under pre-trip information. IET Intel. Transport Syst. 5(1), 70–79 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balmer, M., Rieser, M., Meister, K., Charypar, D., Lefebvre, N., Nagel, K., Axhausen, K.: MATSim-T: Architecture and simulation times. In: Multi-agent systems for traffic and transportation engineering, pp. 57–78 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Witte, A., Hollevoet, J., Dobruszkes, F., Hubert, M., Macharis, C.: Linking modal choice to motility: a comprehensive review. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 49, 329–341 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.: Simulation for the social scientist. Open University Press (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grimaldo, F., Lozano, M., Barber, F., Guerra-Hernández, A.: Towards a model for urban mobility social simulation. Prog. AI 1(2), 149–156 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hajinasab, B., Davidsson, P., Persson, J.A.: A survey on the use of computational models for Ex ante analysis of urban transport policy instruments. Procedia Comput. Sci. 32, 348–355 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heinen, E., van Wee, B., Maat, K.: Commuting by bicycle: an overview of the literature. Transp. Rev. 30(1), 59–96 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hine, J., Scott, J.: Seamless, accessible travel: users’ views of the public transport journey and interchange. Transp. Policy 7(3), 217–226 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horton, F.E.: Behavioral models in transportation planning. Transp. Eng. J. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 98, 411–419 (1972)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johansson, M.V., Heldt, T., Johansson, P.: The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 40(6), 507–525 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lave, S.C.A.: A behavioral approach to modal split forecasting. Transp. Res. 3(4), 463–480 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McDonnell, S., Zellner, M.: Exploring the effectiveness of bus rapid transit a prototype agent-based model of commuting behaviour. Transp. Policy 18(6), 825–835 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nitta, Y., Do, G.: Transportation mode-change model to special bus incorporating generalized time. In: 8th International Conference on Transport and Mobility for Elderly and Disabled People (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramstedt, L.: Transport policy analysis using multi-agent-based simulation, Doctoral Dissertation Series No. 2008:09, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Takama, T., Preston, J.: Forecasting the effects of road user charge by stochastic agent-based modelling. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 42, 738–749 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teodorovic, D.: Transport modeling by multi-agent systems: a swarm intelligence approach. Transp. Planning Technol. 26(4), 289–312 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-criteria decision making methods a comparative study. Springer, New York (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walle, S.V., Steenberghen, T.: Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 40(2), 151–162 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Banafsheh Hajinasab
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paul Davidsson
    • 1
  • Jan A. Persson
    • 1
  • Johan Holmgren
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceMalmö UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations