Genetic Programming Algorithms for Dynamic Environments

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9598)

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms are a family of stochastic search heuristics that include Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Genetic Programming (GP). Both GAs and GPs have been successful in many applications, mainly with static scenarios. However, many real world applications involve dynamic environments (DE). Many work has been made to adapt GAs to DEs, but only a few efforts in adapting GPs for this kind of environments. In this paper we present novel GP algorithms for dynamic environments and study their performance using three dynamic benchmark problems, from the areas of Symbolic Regression, Classification and Path Planning. Furthermore, we apply the best algorithm we found in the navigation of an Erratic Robot through a dynamic Santa Fe Ant Trail and compare its performance to the standard GP algorithm. The results, statistically validated, are very promising.

Keywords

Evolutionary algorithms Genetic programing Dynamic environments 

References

  1. 1.
    Branke, J.: Evolutionary Optimization in Dynamic Environments. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cobb, H.G.: An investigation into the use of hypermutation as an adaptive operator in genetic algorithms having continuous, time-dependent nonstationary environments. Technical report, DTIC Document (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cobb, H.G., Grefenstette, J.J.: Genetic algorithms for tracking changing environments. Technical report, DTIC Document (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doucette, J., Heywood, M.I.: Novelty-based fitness: an evaluation under the Santa Fe Trail. In: Esparcia-Alcázar, A.I., Ekárt, A., Silva, S., Dignum, S., Uyar, A.Ş. (eds.) EuroGP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6021, pp. 50–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fioriti, V., Fratichini, F., Chiesa, S., Moriconi, C.: Lévy foraging in a dynamic environment-extending the Lévy search. Int. J. Adv. Robot Syst. 12(98) (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerkey, B., Vaughan, R.T., Howard, A.: The player/stage project: tools for multi-robot and distributed sensor systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference On Advanced Robotics (ICAR ), pp. 317–323 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg, D.E., Smith, R.E.: Nonstationary function optimization using genetic algorithms with dominance and diploidy. In: ICGA, pp. 59–68 (1987)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koza, J.: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, vol. 1. MIT press, Cambridge (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, C., Liu, H., Yang, J.: A path planning method based on adaptive genetic algorithm for mobile robot. J. Inf. Comput. Sci. 8(5), 808–814 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Macedo, J.: Genetic programming algorithms for dynamic environments. Master’s thesis, University of Coimbra, Portugal, September 2015Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ng, K.P., Wong, K.C.: A new diploid scheme and dominance change mechanism for non-stationary function optimization. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 159–166. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen, T.T., Yang, S., Branke, J.: Evolutionary dynamic optimization: a survey of the state of the art. Swarm Evol. Comput. 6, 1–24 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Neill, M., Nicolau, M., Brabazon, A.: Dynamic environments can speed up evolution with genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 191–192. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quigley, M., Conley, K., Gerkey, B., Faust, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., Wheeler, R., Ng, A.Y.: Ros: an open-source robot operating system. In: ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Riekert, M., Malan, K.M., Engelbrect, A.P.: Adaptive genetic programming for dynamic classification problems. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2009, pp. 674–681. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shengxiang, Y., Yao, X.: Evolutionary Computation for Dynamic Optimization Problems, vol. 1. Springer, Berlin (2013)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simões, A.: Improving memory-based evolutionary algorithms for dynamic environments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Coimbra (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simões, A., Costa, E.: On biologically inspired genetic operators: transformation in the standard genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 584–591 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simões, A., Costa, E.: Using genetic algorithms to deal with dynamic environments: a comparative study of several approaches based on promoting diversity. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference GECCO, vol. 2 (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sugawara, K., Kazama, T., Watanabe, T.: Foraging behavior of interacting robots with virtual pheromone. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (IROS 2004), vol. 3, pp. 3074–3079. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teuscher, C., Sanchez, E., Sipper, M.: Romero’s Odyssey to Santa Fe: from simulation to real life. Robot. Manufact. Syst. Recent Results Res. Dev. Appl. 10, 262–267 (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vanneschi, L., Cuccu, G.: A study of genetic programming variable population size for dynamic optimization problems. In: IJCCI, pp. 119–126 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vavak, F., Fogarty, T.C., Jukes, K.: A genetic algorithm with variable range of local search for tracking changing environments. In: Ebeling, W., Rechenberg, I., Voigt, H.-M., Schwefel, Hans-Paul (eds.) PPSN 1996. LNCS, vol. 1141, pp. 376–385. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wagner, N., Michalewicz, Z., Khouja, M., McGregor, R.R.: Time series forecasting for dynamic environments: the DyFor genetic program model. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(4), 433–452 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    David, R., McDermott, J., Castelli, M., Manzoni, L., Goldman, B.W., Kronberger, G., Jaśkowski, W., O’Reilly, U.-M., Luke, S.: Better GP benchmarks: community survey results and proposals. Genet. Program. Evolvable Mach. 14(1), 3–29 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang, S., Tinós, R.: A hybrid immigrants scheme for genetic algorithms in dynamic environments. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 4(3), 243–254 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yin, Z., Brabazon, A., O’Sullivan, C., O’Neil, M.: Genetic programming for dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology, pp. 437–446 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Systems and RoboticsCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Center of Informatics and Systems of the University of CoimbraUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations